Image

Tyler's And One

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

ewingxmanstarks
Banned User
Posts: 1,585
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Tyler's And One 

Post#1 » by ewingxmanstarks » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:39 pm

Did anyone else think Tyler's break away dunk in the fourth yesterday (when he got fouled from behind) should have been a clear path foul? There was no defender in front of him, and he got fouled from behind...that should have been a And One with the ball on the side IMO.
chube
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,360
And1: 51
Joined: Aug 30, 2010

Re: Tyler's And One 

Post#2 » by chube » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:23 pm

I can never keep the clear path rule straight (and assuming we're talking about the same play), but I thought the clear path rule only came into play if the players/ball hadn't crossed the half-court line yet.

Could very well be wrong though.
ewingxmanstarks
Banned User
Posts: 1,585
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: Tyler's And One 

Post#3 » by ewingxmanstarks » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:30 pm

chube wrote:I can never keep the clear path rule straight (and assuming we're talking about the same play), but I thought the clear path rule only came into play if the players/ball hadn't crossed the half-court line yet.

Could very well be wrong though.


Just looked it up...U R right

Clear Path to the Basket: If a fast break starts in a team’s backcourt and a defender fouls any offensive player when the team is going to score an easy basket, a clear path foul has occurred. When the foul happens, no defender can be ahead of the ball where he could defend against the easy basket

Sorry Never mind.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Tyler's And One 

Post#4 » by Boneman2 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:15 am

Whatever it was, it would have been catastrophic had Boozer not let up at the end.

In my estimation, it was a clear-path situation, Tyler should've been given the and1, and the ball out of bounds. Also, like I was saying earlier, Boozer's contact on that play was borderline flagrant. He made no play on the ball, and committed enough contact that Tyler had to hang on the rim an extra second and twist in midair to avoid slamming to his back.

Whatever it is, David Stern needs to address malicious intentions. Boozer should be fined atleast $20 k.

Also Kurt Thomas is savvy enough to land inadvertent elbows on cue. If it happens again it is not an accident, and he should be suspended if he can't refrain from using his elbows as weapons.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
User avatar
umfan83
RealGM
Posts: 19,699
And1: 3,306
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: Summertime Chi
         

Re: Tyler's And One 

Post#5 » by umfan83 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:56 am

I know I am in enemy territory here so Ill try not to be too biased, but to me Boozers foul looked worse than it did. It was a stupid foul by Boozer but it looked like he was trying to wrap up Hansborough around the waste to disrupt the shot. The problem is that they were both going full speed making the foul look worse than it was. I, too, thought it was a little over aggressive foul until I saw the replay a few times.

Regarding Kurt Thomas, yeah none of those elbows were on accident. He's made a living delivering those elbows for 15 years. I get it but as a Bulls fan, it doesnt make me particularly proud, especially when you see someone almost get concussed from one like Tyler did.
RealGM Bulls Board veteran of the following failed epic battles:
-Kobe (2008)
-Amare (2009)
-Bosh (2010 trade deadline and FA)
-LeBron (2010)
-Wade (2010)
-Melo (2014)
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Tyler's And One 

Post#6 » by FreeRon » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:00 pm

If you're going to call that you have to call the play that happened right after that when Danny fouled Noah...although I think Noah should have been teched for hanging on the rim long after he could have dropped safely.

Return to Indiana Pacers