gipper08 wrote:I wouldn't trade PG for DIpo. I said Dipo, Gordon(and Harkless for salaries) for PG. Big difference.
More wrong? So you think PG is more than 15% better than Dipo? what %??
I don't think it was a "freak" accident. It was a careless accident(that would have happened to MANY players but not all).
I just don't think it is likely that PG can be a franchise player on a championship team. The pacers are better off getting two likely "stars" in exchange for their"superstar". PG has only had "good" playoffs runs. He has never had a "great" playoff run.(with just a two year sample as "the man").
It is likely PG has peaked.(which does not mean he will decline)
Of course you seem to think Ghill can potentially/possibly be the centerpiece that lands DIPO , which is crazy, so I don't think we are going to agree.
IMO, you, you personally, have the same chance of being the centerpiece of a DIPO trade as does George Hill.
I guess in my time of watching basketball I've only seen 2 people break their leg in half like that. So to say that could happen to many that's just dumb. An so U think a 24 year old player is tapped out? Whatever then. Secondly what has dipo done? U think the pacers would've made a deep playoff run without pg? No way . I personally don't see a big difference in the magic since he's been there. A lot of players can be good on a bad team. Now I'm not saying dipo isn't good I just don't see the need to trade what most NBA fans an pacers think is a super star for 2 all stars. No thank you! An are u a pacer or magic fan?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums