Image

Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

ducler
Cold Hard Gameday Facts
Posts: 15,607
And1: 8,991
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: France
 

Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#1 » by ducler » Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:57 pm

Image
Image
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,401
And1: 836
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#2 » by Pacersike » Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:45 pm

Never thought it could be possible for the Pacers to erase all the good things from previous games, but they managed to do it.

At least London and Europe now know what an NBA 2k star player looks like.

Games like these are the best indications that PG will likely always fail to lead his team to any finals.

I say trade him before all GMs get the memo. This has nothing to do with quality and everything with mentality. What a shameful performance.
chube
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,360
And1: 51
Joined: Aug 30, 2010

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#3 » by chube » Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:01 am

Haven't watched the game obviously but looking for a silver lining...still above .500?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#4 » by Grang33r » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:17 am

This was the worst game i have seen them play in a very long time. Even post brawl, they had an excuse of lack of talent on the court but guys like David Harrison atleast showed up each game. This was bad. No effort on defense whatsoever.
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
Pacers_Freak
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 2,817
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#5 » by Pacers_Freak » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:52 pm

Pacersike wrote:Never thought it could be possible for the Pacers to erase all the good things from previous games, but they managed to do it.

At least London and Europe now know what an NBA 2k star player looks like.

Games like these are the best indications that PG will likely always fail to lead his team to any finals.

I say trade him before all GMs get the memo. This has nothing to do with quality and everything with mentality. What a shameful performance.


The trade PG stuff is over played and old. There is no way you get fair market value in a return. Just impossible to get. Silly to insinuate that you could.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,401
And1: 836
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#6 » by Pacersike » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:48 am

Pacers_Freak wrote:
Pacersike wrote:Never thought it could be possible for the Pacers to erase all the good things from previous games, but they managed to do it.

At least London and Europe now know what an NBA 2k star player looks like.

Games like these are the best indications that PG will likely always fail to lead his team to any finals.

I say trade him before all GMs get the memo. This has nothing to do with quality and everything with mentality. What a shameful performance.


The trade PG stuff is over played and old. There is no way you get fair market value in a return. Just impossible to get. Silly to insinuate that you could.

You and me, no we can not. A GM with a better nose for true basketball talent, why not?

Bigger chance you screw up I admit that, but watching him sign a contract for the Lakers, might turn out to be an even bigger mistake. Remember our last big signings were players like Jefferson, Ellis, Stuckey. And that was with the great PG on the team.

If Myles Turner will ever be good enough to lure good free agents on his own, he will also be good enough to build a team around with players you can get for PG.

Depending on what happens in the playoffs, trading PG is an option they have to consider. Myles Turner has that competitive edge that players like Reggie and D West also showcased, but in order to get a new King, one must kill the old King first. Or trade him to Braavos, where the wealth is.
Pacers_Freak
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 2,817
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#7 » by Pacers_Freak » Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:59 pm

Pacersike wrote:
Pacers_Freak wrote:
Pacersike wrote:Never thought it could be possible for the Pacers to erase all the good things from previous games, but they managed to do it.

At least London and Europe now know what an NBA 2k star player looks like.

Games like these are the best indications that PG will likely always fail to lead his team to any finals.

I say trade him before all GMs get the memo. This has nothing to do with quality and everything with mentality. What a shameful performance.


The trade PG stuff is over played and old. There is no way you get fair market value in a return. Just impossible to get. Silly to insinuate that you could.

You and me, no we can not. A GM with a better nose for true basketball talent, why not?

Bigger chance you screw up I admit that, but watching him sign a contract for the Lakers, might turn out to be an even bigger mistake. Remember our last big signings were players like Jefferson, Ellis, Stuckey. And that was with the great PG on the team.

If Myles Turner will ever be good enough to lure good free agents on his own, he will also be good enough to build a team around with players you can get for PG.

Depending on what happens in the playoffs, trading PG is an option they have to consider. Myles Turner has that competitive edge that players like Reggie and D West also showcased, but in order to get a new King, one must kill the old King first. Or trade him to Braavos, where the wealth is.


You just made the point of why you would never trade PG. We are not going to be a big free agent destination so you hang on to the home grown talent. It is a gamble that he leaves on his own. However, financially it makes sense to stay. Unless he says I'm not coming back.... you keep him. No ands, ifs, or buts.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,401
And1: 836
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#8 » by Pacersike » Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:53 am

Pacers_Freak wrote:You just made the point of why you would never trade PG. We are not going to be a big free agent destination so you hang on to the home grown talent. It is a gamble that he leaves on his own. However, financially it makes sense to stay. Unless he says I'm not coming back.... you keep him. No ands, ifs, or buts.

All I'm saying is that if Paul would leave and the Pacers have to start over again by drafting in the lottery again in 2019, for a part they would be wasting some of the good years of Myles Turner. A bit similar how they have not went all-in to give PG a contending team. Myles Turner after all, just isn't ready to contend with the big guys. That wouldn't have been such an issue if Larry Bird had done a better job signing players who can help a team contending.

Some of us want to trade Myles to help Paul George right now, others want to be laughed at when they offer some of our other players in a vain attempt to get out of this mess. I see this mess as a swamp where we can't get out and I prefer to move on and trade PG for some very good youngsters who are about the same age as Myles Turner. Call it impossible as much as you want, but this year's playoffs for a big part will guide GMs, players and us into a certain direction and I just expect an early exit.

Ever since David West has left the team, this team lacks a leader that can motivate others to give effort almost every single night.
Paul is trying to be one, but I have yet to see improvement that stays.

If a player like Kevin Durant could leave a team like the Thunder, why wouldn't it be possible that Paul leaves? And I don't know about you, but I'm not impressed by Russell Westbrook his stats. I'm actually concerned that he has to do so much right now and I feel like it takes even less as usual to get him annoyed. For the sake of the Thunder, I hope they can add another star player soon, because not a single one of us humans wants to find himself in a worse situation than before, no matter how many triple double he can gather.

I also know that I was one of the few on this board that predicted Durant would leave the Thunder, although I predicted for New York :P Right now I predict that the Pacers won't advance 2 rounds and that Paul George, just like Durant, will realize that he could use some better help to contend again, perhaps even a better player, to play as his Robin next to Batman. Thing is, on the same team, it rarely happens that a player as good as PG would take a backseat to give another player the crown.

Bottomline is, I just don't feel like PG is good enough to contend with him as our first option. Sure, his stats look great, but he hasn't been able to get consistent production out of his teammates, let alone making them better. His assist/turnover ratio is among the league's worst of qualified players (82 out of 85). And thanks to London, he can add another one to his list of moments when he looked a bit lost when the spotlight was mostly on him. He is a great player to have on team USA or in the Allstar game or even in regular season clutch games. Whenever the pressure on his shoulders rises though, he starts to struggle (all star 3 point shooting contest, London, last year playoffs game 7 at Toronto, 7! turnovers, 1 assist. It might come with time, but when your GM has his own flaws and can hardly be called a top 5 GM, one of them, GM or player, might pull the plug out of it. A contract extension will only make PG's trade value go up, so both parties can still cancel the marriage.

Big chance our GM takes another chance at improving the team though. That's just what happens most of the time.
Doesn't make the Thunder situation any less explosive though. Which player is going to sign there when even Durant thought they were not good enough? They can trade Westbrook if they have to and push reset, but the Pacers have Turner and will do him no justice if they have to start adding draft pieces in 2019 to play with him in 2020, when he will be much more ready to contend.

But I don't mind to be wrong again and playoffs could turn out better than I expect, so I better sush now :)
Pacers_Freak
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 2,817
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: Game 39: Indiana Pacers (20-18) @ Denver Nuggets (14-23) - 3:00 PM ET 

Post#9 » by Pacers_Freak » Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:15 pm

Pacersike wrote:
Pacers_Freak wrote:You just made the point of why you would never trade PG. We are not going to be a big free agent destination so you hang on to the home grown talent. It is a gamble that he leaves on his own. However, financially it makes sense to stay. Unless he says I'm not coming back.... you keep him. No ands, ifs, or buts.

All I'm saying is that if Paul would leave and the Pacers have to start over again by drafting in the lottery again in 2019, for a part they would be wasting some of the good years of Myles Turner. A bit similar how they have not went all-in to give PG a contending team. Myles Turner after all, just isn't ready to contend with the big guys. That wouldn't have been such an issue if Larry Bird had done a better job signing players who can help a team contending.

Some of us want to trade Myles to help Paul George right now, others want to be laughed at when they offer some of our other players in a vain attempt to get out of this mess. I see this mess as a swamp where we can't get out and I prefer to move on and trade PG for some very good youngsters who are about the same age as Myles Turner. Call it impossible as much as you want, but this year's playoffs for a big part will guide GMs, players and us into a certain direction and I just expect an early exit.

Ever since David West has left the team, this team lacks a leader that can motivate others to give effort almost every single night.
Paul is trying to be one, but I have yet to see improvement that stays.

If a player like Kevin Durant could leave a team like the Thunder, why wouldn't it be possible that Paul leaves? And I don't know about you, but I'm not impressed by Russell Westbrook his stats. I'm actually concerned that he has to do so much right now and I feel like it takes even less as usual to get him annoyed. For the sake of the Thunder, I hope they can add another star player soon, because not a single one of us humans wants to find himself in a worse situation than before, no matter how many triple double he can gather.

I also know that I was one of the few on this board that predicted Durant would leave the Thunder, although I predicted for New York :P Right now I predict that the Pacers won't advance 2 rounds and that Paul George, just like Durant, will realize that he could use some better help to contend again, perhaps even a better player, to play as his Robin next to Batman. Thing is, on the same team, it rarely happens that a player as good as PG would take a backseat to give another player the crown.

Bottomline is, I just don't feel like PG is good enough to contend with him as our first option. Sure, his stats look great, but he hasn't been able to get consistent production out of his teammates, let alone making them better. His assist/turnover ratio is among the league's worst of qualified players (82 out of 85). And thanks to London, he can add another one to his list of moments when he looked a bit lost when the spotlight was mostly on him. He is a great player to have on team USA or in the Allstar game or even in regular season clutch games. Whenever the pressure on his shoulders rises though, he starts to struggle (all star 3 point shooting contest, London, last year playoffs game 7 at Toronto, 7! turnovers, 1 assist. It might come with time, but when your GM has his own flaws and can hardly be called a top 5 GM, one of them, GM or player, might pull the plug out of it. A contract extension will only make PG's trade value go up, so both parties can still cancel the marriage.

Big chance our GM takes another chance at improving the team though. That's just what happens most of the time.
Doesn't make the Thunder situation any less explosive though. Which player is going to sign there when even Durant thought they were not good enough? They can trade Westbrook if they have to and push reset, but the Pacers have Turner and will do him no justice if they have to start adding draft pieces in 2019 to play with him in 2020, when he will be much more ready to contend.

But I don't mind to be wrong again and playoffs could turn out better than I expect, so I better sush now :)


Sheesh

Return to Indiana Pacers