JMaster5K wrote:Wizop wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:Almost 1/4 of the way through the season this is the worst Pacers team I've seen since the early days of the NBA. They beat the equally hapless Wizards tonight to earn their 3rd win. Blame it on injuries it doesn't matter they will be lucky to win 20 games. I don't normally say this but just tank it!
I'm for a quick and nasty rebuild. I won't be shocked if there is a major trade involving the Pacers by the deadline.
We're old enough to remember when they put curtains up to hide the empty upper deck at MSA. I can't imagine us making a trade to get worse unless it's a Mathurin deal. Conversely, I definitely don't want to trade to win more this year as I really like what I see at the top of the draft. We won't even need luck in the lottery to get a difference maker.
82-83 = 20 wins; 83-84 = 26 wins; 84-85 = 22 wins; 85-86 = 26 wins,... old enough to remember an exhausted, sweat-drenched Steve Stipanovich barely able to speak in a post game interview when they left everything on the floor, & lost another game by double digits.
The difference,... that team had no hope. They had nothing to look forward to. From all accounts, Tyrese is rehabbing well, and should be back next season healthy. He will need to shake the rust off,... but what made him so good before the injury, should still make him effective when he returns. We, at least, have hope.
(P.S. that hope gets even bigger with a top pick in this years loaded draft.)

This is for you and Wizop. I do remember the games with the curtains. I remember buying a $5 ticket and moving down the empty seats in the lower levels for the 2nd half because MSA was half empty. I also remember Stipo, and Kellogg and Herb Williams. The Pacers had a promising team at one time and injuries wrecked it, Stipo and Kellogg both ended early due to knee injuries. Now modern medical procedures fix things that would end a players playing days. Tyrese will come back and should be pretty close to the player he was before the injury.
But if you guys think all we have to do is get Haliburton back and run the same team out there next season. Without Turner and with some rookie center or one of these guys we have now at center, and we're gonna win games and repeat the 2025 finals run. You need to think again. Other teams in the East are getting better while we stand pat, and add a rookie and or some free agent center. The team must be proactive and look to get better or inertia will pull them backwards. Detroit and Toronto are looking better and Miami, Cleveland, NYK and Atlanta all in the way and don't forget Boston will be back next year with Tatum rehabbing his Achilles.
We're talking about trading Mathurin who has looked really good in a bigger role at 23 because he's gonna want to be paid $25-30 million and we can't go into the tax. We have 2 players making $50 million a year and Siakam is turning 32 in April 2026. I'd say we'd be better off getting a haul from trading Siakam and paying Mathurin. We also have Nembhard at $18 million and Toppin at $14 million with Nesmith and TJ around $10-11 million. IF the current winning or lack of continues they may well get a top 4 pick and that's another $10 million contract.
Can the Pacers stay out of the tax and pay these guys? I'm saying not with 2 $50 million contracts at the top. And the Pacers need to stay out of the tax for a number of reasons, unless they are going to the finals. As I said our East competitors have gotten a lot better. Our deep team, run your legs off style might work against the Knicks or Sixers but can we keep wear out Atlanta or Detroit if they are fully healthy or Boston?
I know this is not a popular idea, but I think if they are going to stay out of the tax they should restructure the payroll and that has to start at the top. They should explore trading Siakam for expiring salary, players in their rookie contracts or signed to team friendly deals and 2-3 #1 picks.
I'll acknowledge that Mathurin presents and line up issue, at his size he should be a SG, but if TH comes back next season and we have Nembhard as a starting guard with Nesmith playing SF it looks like Mathurin would be a 6th man. The team is already looking at a 3 guard starting line up, because at 6'6'' Nesmith looks more like a big guard to me. That makes Mathurin "redundant" so the answer is hard to pin down.
If you trade Siakam for a matching short salary package and future picks, and sign Mathurin to $25 million a year, you create a small ball team with too many guys in the 6'5'' to 6'6'' range and not enough 6'8'' to 6'10'' ish guys.
After much consternation and analysis on this I come to a two step process on this. I'm not for a Philly style multi year tank-a-thon but to get back to the finals they are gonna have to get better not just come back in 2026-27 with the same team and a "Turner replacement."
Step one would be to trade Siakam now while his value is at it's highest, and clear out part of that $50 million salary that's coming up for a 32 yr old. Then sign Mathurin to $25 million. Come back in 2026-27 with a top draft pick and maybe a better center option or rotation. The 2nd step would then be to trade Mathurin after he's on the new contract in the 2027 off season. They would need to play some kind of 3 guard rotation with Haliburton, Nembhard and Mathurin. Admittedly this 2026-27 team may not be great or even make the East conf finals, but 2027 team could be young, deep and good, and under the tax.
I know that is a complex idea with no specific trade idea's for either step. Not knowing what teams who are contenders right now would be willing to give up to get a Pascal Siakam makes it rough to predict. I'm sure some of the contenders don't have the draft picks or young players to get me to pull the trigger. LAL, LAC, Minn, Knicks, Bucks, GSW or Denver don't have the picks or pieces to match salary. And doing a trade in mid season is tough because you have to have the roster spots to make the move. 4 for 1 is really hard to pull off.
I do think something is gonna happen. But they may just slide to the off season and address it then, hopefully with a top 3 draft pick.