Do the Pacers take Cole Aldrich or Gordon Hayward at no.10?

token · Post #1 » by **token** » Wed May 19, 2010 4:10 am

Post #2 » by **PR07** » Wed May 19, 2010 5:10 am

I don't think anyone can definitely say no, I mean it's possible. However, I think there are players who are just as talented and will fill bigger needs, so I'd lean towards no.

kdawg531 · Post #3 » by **kdawg531** » Wed May 19, 2010 6:23 am

token wrote:Do the Pacers take Cole Aldrich or Gordon Hayward at no.10?

I hope you're joking.

laydo · Post #4 » by **laydo** » Wed May 19, 2010 7:08 am

Aldrich isn't likely fall to #10 since Utah may pick him at 9.

Gordon Hayward !? He's good but he's not Larry Bird. It's a waste to pick a SF with #10. pick since we have Danny Granger.

Moooose · Post #5 » by **Moooose** » Wed May 19, 2010 7:27 am

Coming into this year's draft, the Pacers need a good point guard, a good power forward who can start next season after Murphy's stint is over, a back-up defensive center to replace the expiring big men, and maybe an upgrade over Rush at the 2, if there is any.
I don't see the need to draft Aldrich, unless we're moving Hibbert, which is unlikely. The back-up defensive center could be at no. 40 or no.57. At no.10, there would be a nice list of power forwards to choose from. Even if Larry chooses talent over position, i still personally think it's going to be a PF with Monroe, Patterson, Davis, Udoh, Motiejunas, and others that could be available at number 10.

Post #6 » by **Miller4ever** » Wed May 19, 2010 9:51 am

I don't think the OP is serious. I think this is yet another unfunny dig at our team's whiteness.

Kuq_e_Zi91 · Post #7 » by **Kuq_e_Zi91** » Wed May 19, 2010 10:09 am

Miller4ever wrote:I don't think the OP is serious. I think this is yet another unfunny dig at our team's whiteness.

Yeah, I agree. He posted the same topic on the Wiz board too. :nonono:

pacersrule08 · Post #8 » by **pacersrule08** » Wed May 19, 2010 10:33 am

Ekpe Udoh all the way

Post #9 » by **Gremz** » Wed May 19, 2010 11:00 am

How very funny.

I'd take Whiteside above both, and so should Bird.

Donerik · Post #10 » by **Donerik** » Wed May 19, 2010 10:42 pm

neither, not with the 10th pick. Cole can't play with Roy, Gordon would be there if we traded back for the 20th pick and some chips.

Post #11 » by **Grang33r** » Thu May 20, 2010 3:22 am

Of course this kid is not serious. He made a similar thread which was closed earlier in the day.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1012295

basketballwacko2 · Post #12 » by **basketballwacko2** » Thu May 27, 2010 7:31 pm

Miller4ever wrote:I don't think the OP is serious. I think this is yet another unfunny dig at our team's whiteness.

That is exactly what the fool is saying. I'm for Monroe, Patterson or Bledsoe.

jowglenn · Post #13 » by **jowglenn** » Thu May 27, 2010 7:58 pm

Yeah, doesn't help that his name is "token" (as in, token white guy on a team)

Boneman2 · Post #14 » by **Boneman2** » Fri May 28, 2010 5:59 am

Aldrich isn't likely fall to #10 since Utah may pick him at 9.

Passing the buck to Utah again, very good.

fj20 · Post #15 » by **fj20** » Mon May 31, 2010 10:30 pm

simple....neither.....hopefully monroe is still there