Image

Thoughts On Paul George

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

TDotRep
Banned User
Posts: 1,528
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2010

Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#1 » by TDotRep » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:44 am

As a Toronto fan I was hoping my team would have been able to land him, I really thought he could be something special. Based on interviews summer league, and the general impression you get from this kid, how good do you think he will become and how good could he possibly become?
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#2 » by Indy2thaWindy » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:03 am

At the worst JR Smith.
Indy4Life
Sophomore
Posts: 167
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 05, 2008

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#3 » by Indy4Life » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:28 am

solid defender, nice range, sweet stroke, great freethrwo shooter...poor ballhandler.

Just my first impression
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#4 » by Boneman2 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:51 am

superb elevation. long arms. seemed to grow more confident as the week in Orlando progressed.

his handles reminded me of Granger's earlier bad habits.. holding the ball too low, dribbling into traffic, and just basically not being aware of his surroundings. As he matures and the game slows down, his ability to handle the ball will improve. He didn't seem clumsy or indecisive, he just made some poor decisions and got careless w/ the ball.

Otherwise, I totally see the T-Mac comparisons, they share a lot of similarities.

Of course he has such a long way to go to get to that level, but the potential to get there is clearly evident.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
aquatic92
Banned User
Posts: 146
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#5 » by aquatic92 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:08 am

Agreed with boneman. When I saw him in Summer League, he didnt seem to really have the awareness of when and where the double teams would come and thats when he lost the ball when I was watching.

He has a good shooting stroke so I think with time his shot will improve, hell John Wall shot worse than George did in the SL. His athleticism is amazing, his hops remind me of when Fred Jones was with the Pacers. He will definitely benefit from playing with Danny and Roy. He definitely has the potential to be better the Granger because of his shooting stroke and athleticism but for now if he can just grow into a role beside Granger, I'd be more than satisfied with that. George and Danny would be the 2nd coming of the Reggie and Jalen duo that the Pacers had in the late 90's/early 2000's.

all of that said, we'll have to wait and see, but im excited for him, as well as Lance, but thats another story.
jowglenn
General Manager
Posts: 8,134
And1: 3,268
Joined: May 16, 2006
 

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#6 » by jowglenn » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:03 am

aquatic92 wrote:George and Danny would be the 2nd coming of the Reggie and Jalen duo that the Pacers had in the late 90's/early 2000's.



I guarantee that's exactly what Bird was thinking when he drafted George.
Jackson Jiggle
Freshman
Posts: 70
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2010
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#7 » by Jackson Jiggle » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:41 pm

T-Mac comparisons are actually pretty decent. He will never get to what T-Mac once was. But yes I think that he can dominate a game if he needs too. Not this year, but by year three probably.
ardthomp
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2009

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#8 » by ardthomp » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:37 pm

Boneman2 wrote:superb elevation. long arms. seemed to grow more confident as the week in Orlando progressed.

his handles reminded me of Granger's earlier bad habits.. holding the ball too low, dribbling into traffic, and just basically not being aware of his surroundings. As he matures and the game slows down, his ability to handle the ball will improve. He didn't seem clumsy or indecisive, he just made some poor decisions and got careless w/ the ball.

Otherwise, I totally see the T-Mac comparisons, they share a lot of similarities.

Of course he has such a long way to go to get to that level, but the potential to get there is clearly evident.


When you say "holding the ball too low" I'm curious as to what you mean there. I've never heard that before with a perimeter player. Care to elaborate on that for me?
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#9 » by Boneman2 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:06 pm

When you're 6'9" you should keep the ball up high so all these quick athletic guards cannot swipe it away from you. This is vitally important in the post where double and triple teams converge. The higher the ball the more likely a foul will be called. If you're not dribbling the ball, almost everybody knows to keep it high.

If Paul George wants to be more than a 6'9" sg, than he needs to develop the ability to penetrate and post. And if holding the ball a little higher eliminates pesky 1or 2-guards from swiping at the ball, than so be it.
ardthomp
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2009

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#10 » by ardthomp » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:41 pm

Boneman2 wrote:When you're 6'9" you should keep the ball up high so all these quick athletic guards cannot swipe it away from you. This is vitally important in the post where double and triple teams converge. The higher the ball the more likely a foul will be called. If you're not dribbling the ball, almost everybody knows to keep it high.

If Paul George wants to be more than a 6'9" sg, than he needs to develop the ability to penetrate and post. And if holding the ball a little higher eliminates pesky 1or 2-guards from swiping at the ball, than so be it.


I see what you are saying. I understand post players keeping the ball high, but how many times do our wings go into the post?

If he wants to be more than a 6'9 SG, he can't stand out on the perimeter with the ball over his head. That actually allows defenders to take away even more space. That is what the triple threat position is for. It allows you to be ready to penetrate and it keeps defenders from getting to the ball as easy.

Now, I didn't get to see much of the Orlando games for the Summer League, so I can't really reference what you are, so if he was being carless and holding the ball out there for the defender, then yes, I would agree with you, keeping it higher will help him keep it more secure, or at least give him that thought to be more secure.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#11 » by Miller4ever » Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:42 pm

Granger, when playing the 3, goes into the post quite a bit with Troy Murphy popping out.
ardthomp
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2009

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#12 » by ardthomp » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:10 pm

Miller4ever wrote:Granger, when playing the 3, goes into the post quite a bit with Troy Murphy popping out.


The post is on the block...not 16 feet out...and settling for a Detlef Schrempf turn around/fade away
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Thoughts On Paul George 

Post#13 » by Miller4ever » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:04 am

I know what the post is.

He sets up 2 feet away from the basket. He gets that shot at least twice a game. I'm just saying that it's not unheard of for our wings to go into the post.

Return to Indiana Pacers