Image

So who is inactive?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

So who is inactive? 

Post#1 » by Wizop » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Okay, now that we're down to 15, who are the active 12? It's a little easier for the first five as we know Rush sits but let's try both ways.

Point: at least two must be active although three is better. Collison and Price play for sure. I suspect TJ plays if healthy and Stevenson sits unless we are playing a team with a big point guard in which case may TJ sits.

Bigs: you'd like 5 who can play the post. not sure we have that option. Hibbert, McRoberts, Foster, S Jones, and Hansbrough are all we have. you probably have to play them all unless you think both Granger and Posey can fill in at 4 and JMc can be a third 5 in which case you can sit Solo.

Wings: you'd like to have 5 with one of them able to be the third point guard. Stevenson is the only option for that. Dunleavy, Granger, George, and Posey play. Rush sits for now. D Jones is on the bubble.

I think I'd try to sit Solo, Dahntay, and Rush letting Stevenson get a glimpse of what game speed is like while Rush is out, but he'd be on a short leash and if it didn't work in game one, I'd have to activate Dahntay.

when Rush returns, Stevenson would sit unless TJ had managed to play himself to the bench that quickly. injuries will occur to get Stevenson PT. it's also possible that Posey isn't an 80 game player at his age which would open up additional options.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#2 » by Miller4ever » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:42 pm

Rush and TJ automatically sit.

Stephenson sits as well, I think. I think Obie's going to look at it and decide he needs more big bodies because of foul trouble. I would rather Solo sit, though.
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#3 » by Indy2thaWindy » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:49 pm

Is it too early too bring back the "Start Lance at point guard today." sig, or should I pull out the "Start Lance at shooting guard today." sig?
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#4 » by Wizop » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:27 am

Lance isn't going to start at either guard spot but since he is the only guy on the roster who can play both positions that does give him an edge at being the third choice rather than the fourth.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#5 » by Indy2thaWindy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:11 am

AJ can play the 1 and 2.
User avatar
Gremz
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,278
And1: 6,143
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: I am a Norwegian Fisherman
Contact:
         

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#6 » by Gremz » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:59 am

Indy2thaWindy wrote:Is it too early too bring back the "Start Lance at point guard today." sig, or should I pull out the "Start Lance at shooting guard today." sig?


You should get a "Jeff Foster Ate A Hamburger" sig.
Image
User avatar
HookShotHibbert
Sophomore
Posts: 191
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Location: Training the Pacer's next hook shot artist

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#7 » by HookShotHibbert » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:06 am

Based on last season, Obie seems to like TJ for some reason and dislike AJ. I would look for AJ to be inactive before TJ.

Also Obie seems to dislike young players, I think he'll leave Stephenson inactive.

Lastly, he seems to not like D.Jones.

So by no means do I agree with the choices, but I'd say once Rush becomes available, if there are no other injuries, our inactives will be AJ, Lance and Dahntay.
Do the 'Hibbie Hibbie Shake'!!
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#8 » by Miller4ever » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:00 am

TJ actually wouldn't be terrible in a sparkplug role instead of a consistent minutes guy. I say let him play, but cap him at 15 minutes.

His injury looks like it's going to keep him out of Wednesday's game, though.
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#9 » by Indy2thaWindy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:05 am

TJ usually plays good against the Spurs when coming off the bench. I think he'll be activated.
User avatar
glasket
Rookie
Posts: 1,197
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
Location: Sydney

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#10 » by glasket » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:25 am

My picks (once Rush returns)
Solo, Lance, and Dahntay.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#11 » by Wizop » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:31 am

the star seems to think Obie will play Posey ahead of Hansbrough at 4. Obie's talking a 9 man rotation which Mike Wells thinks means Collison/Price, Dunleavey/Granger/George, Hibbert/Foster, McRoberts/Posey.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#12 » by 8305 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:02 pm

First five games it will be Rush, Stephenson and D. Jones.

After that it probably depends on how things go. I'm inclined to think Foster gets first look for backup center minutes. If the small team with Posey at the 4 clicks there could be a need for a 5th wing. That would be Rush after 5 games. If a 5th wing is deemed necessary before then its D. Jones.

If TJ's not sound then Lance dresses.

My best guess is that Lance and Danthay will spend a lot of time in street clothes this year.
chube
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,360
And1: 51
Joined: Aug 30, 2010

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#13 » by chube » Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:29 pm

^^^ Which, to me, is too bad. I really think Dahntay can get that defensive mentality he had in Denver back for Indy. If he could tack that onto the career offensive year he had last season, he could be a big plus. I actually prefer him over Rush at this point. Rush is tough to rely on - when he's on, he's fine, but when he's off, he's invisible sometimes. They both could be used as trade bait eventually though. If that's the case, Rush might be better to showcase to tell other teams that he's worth taking on despite some past mistakes.

I just really hate to see DJ sit because I think he could be a nice piece for us.
User avatar
glasket
Rookie
Posts: 1,197
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
Location: Sydney

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#14 » by glasket » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:17 pm

to me Dahtay is a (slightly) better on-ball defender than Rush
Rush is a better help side defender.

I actually don;t think there is too much difference between them defensively and Rush has a better offensive game so I'd prefer Rush
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#15 » by Miller4ever » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:20 am

Dahntay is more aggressive with his offensive game. If only Rush got that aggression and boldness in his offensive game, he'd be a keeper.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#16 » by Wizop » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:14 pm

chube wrote:I actually prefer him over Rush at this point. Rush is tough to rely on - when he's on, he's fine, but when he's off, he's invisible sometimes.


I blame O'B a bit here. Rush is much better when he is playing the 3 in Granger's spot. Why? Because the offense is setup to run plays for Danny. I think they need to call plays for Rush to keep his head in the game.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
User avatar
IrishLuck31
Sophomore
Posts: 104
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2009
Location: currently DC
Contact:

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#17 » by IrishLuck31 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:43 pm

D. Jones, AJ Price, and Lance Stephenson are inactive for tongiht according to Mike Wells.

so does Rush have to be active for his suspension to function I guess? and TJ must be healthy enough to play over AJ...
"One of the greatest clutch playoff performers of his generation has apparently done it again" -Bob Costas on Reggie's game-winning 3 over MJ in the 1998 ECF.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#18 » by Miller4ever » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:06 pm

I guess it depends on the suspension. Post brawl, those guys didn't have to be part of the active roster, but it was kind of an exception.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#19 » by Boneman2 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:25 pm

Honestly we need to see if Solo has what it takes to b/u Hibbert. I'd actually like to see a bit more of him, and less of Foster. Although Foster is the play in his hometown against TD.

I don't see how Tyler gets knocked down to third on the depth chart when he is neck-n-neck with McBob. Guess you have to jack up threes. My guess is McRoberts will get exposed somewhat because he is not a starting PF in this league. If he was than why didn't Obi develop him more last season (playing time). If Posey surpasses Tyler on the depth chart than he might as well surpass McBob too.

Don't get me wrong, Josh will do some good at times, but I guarantee he can't sustain that type of energy banging with players that are bigger and stronger. For all we know the PF minutes could get split up amongst 4-5 players. Approximate split ( Josh 40% - Tyler 30% - Posey 20%- Granger 10%).

Posey will pick up some of Grangers scraps at SF too.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: So who is inactive? 

Post#20 » by Indy2thaWindy » Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:29 pm

Boneman2 wrote:My guess is McRoberts will get exposed somewhat because he is not a starting PF in this league. If he was than why didn't Obi develop him more last season (playing time).


There's your answer.

Return to Indiana Pacers