End of Regular Season
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:34 am
Just a few thoughts from me in what will be a memorable season, starting from the lockout to a great finish.
As you guys should expect by now, I'm going to focus on the positive.
At the beginning of the season, I was optimistic that we would be over .500 and jockeying for position from 4-6. I thought that we would be relatively unprepared next to the other teams that would experience more continuity coming into the season.
We exceeded all of that. Individually, here's how I thought everyone did.
Danny Granger: Started slow. It really did seem like he was experiencing on-court chemistry imbalance. He was more tentative then I'd ever seen him, and when he went aggressive it wasn't quite channeled right. Just not clicking. Yet here we are at the end of the season and thanks to a monster post all-star break run, he's ended the season with 54% TS, while playing the kind of defense we wanted out of him for the last two seasons. He's actually ended the season being the most productive he's been since his MIP campaign.
Roy Hibbert: The questions about his strength and foul trouble and mental toughness were erased when he became an all-star. He gained strength physically and mentally. I want to focus on two areas of the game where his progress interested me. First, his free throws got worse. Early on, when he was around 65% for the season, I started noticing that he was missing everything long, and I'm sure I pointed that out a few times. He was getting used to his strength. He adjusted and is back at 71% to end the season. The second area where his strength played a major factor was rebounding. Rik Smits is no longer a fair comparison. While Smits still has more offensive firepower than Hibbert (which might not be the case given Hibbert's offseason focus) Hibbert has surpassed his legacy on defense and on the boards. Hibbert is essentially a double-digit rebounder and his feel for rebounding was much more improved this season.
David West: Worst case scenario his knee is shot and he is a corpse. Best case scenario he returns to all-star form. While 31-year-old David West isn't at his prime, he has been worth every penny. How many times have we needed a bucket this season and West drops a jumper or hammers it in for a hook or, failing to score, destroys the bejesus out of somebody, doing that thing where he pushes his jersey up with one hand? Like Granger, he has got himself going post all-star break and despite having lost agility, he fits this team like a glove. I thought he would need some time to get into it, too. Instead he had two double-doubles in the first 3 games.
Paul George: He started the season much stronger than he ended it. But it wasn't about production. For Paul George I only want to point to one game. Against the defending champion Dallas Mavericks, on their home floor, he posted 30 points, 9 rebounds, 5 assists, 5 steals and 1 block for good measure, while not turning it over once. He did this on 7-11 from beyond the arc. It's not like he's going to average these numbers over a season (most likely not...) but it shows the promise in him. If he fills in the small but significant gaps in his game, he can be really special. With that being said, he met expectations for a sophomore, getting picked as a starter for the Rookie-Sophomore challenge and lighting it up (with the lights off) in the dunk contest. The 3rd season jump will be riveting basketball.
Darren Collison: I'm used to watching Pacers point guards and wincing. I'm not gonna lie. There was some wincing this season. However, it was less than I expected. I trusted the coaches in their utilization of Collison and Vogel's willingness to sit him for key stretches. The point guard position in the NBA is hard to master if you don't have the instincts for it. There isn't a player on the Pacers roster with a complete set of those instincts. I expected Collison to be a game manager, and he was just that, getting his shots in opportunistically and having the best turnover ratio of his career (23rd among qualified leaders, 2 below Rose, 13 ABOVE Williams and 16 above Wall). A positive contributor to the team's 7th-best turnover rate.
George Hill: Right at the heels of Collison comes George Hill. An early season comparison for him was Jason Terry, an important scoring PG who, despite being a bench player, would be very important. He's replacing Collison in what I feel (and the coaches describe) is a "you're not bad, he's just better" benching of Collison. Like Granger he was tentative among new teammates, but not knowing him, I learned to love him quickly because I like his fun off-the-court demeanor and how it's all business on the court. I think he's great for this team in any capacity, so it'll be interesting to see the guards situation for the Pacers next season.
Leandro Barbosa: In a short time, he's already become a fan favorite and really hit the ground running. His shooting from inside the arc isn't so good, but he's been sinking timely 3's at a very good rate, so I'm not complaining yet, especially for the price. His passing has been good, and he's been what the bench has needed to become a complete deep threat.
Dahntay Jones: When the season started I thought smashmouth basketball was going to have a place for him. With the development of George and the acquisition of Barbosa, he's become the odd man out. While he's played, though, he's actually been a good threat from the corners, but he commits too many fouls on both ends of the floor. I personally like him, and I feel like he's a positive presence in the locker room and great for the camaraderie of the team.
Tyler Hansbrough: He hasn't really disappointed, nor has he impressed. He gets some points and annoys people a lot. I imagine he's really good in practice and makes everyone else work harder. His hard work and flailing isn't really working out for him on the court, though. The refs don't seem to like him, and his jumper was weaker this season, as he's just had less shots overall and he is a rhythm shooter. He'll need to get other options so that he has something else to go to when he can't get to the line or make jumpers.
Lou Amundson: Louuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu. He's great. Anything he gets is usually just gravy.
Lance Stephenson: Still a lot of potential, but still very raw. His jumper was inconsistent. When he shot it properly it was accurate, but he has a tendency to let old habits creep in. The same is true for his decision-making. He's what I would expect out of a 2nd-round project player.
AJ Price: I felt he took a step back. He has not been as consistent shooting the ball, but that could just be because of sparse minutes. Still, with Hill gone and Collison gone, there were times when he couldn't get the ball near the net.
Jeff Pendergraph: Optimistically, he could be a long-term backup on this team at the PF spot.
Kyrylo Fesenko: Stanko who?
Jeff Foster: Great guy. Retired always being a positive to the team no matter how bad his game or body was. No mean feat.
As you guys should expect by now, I'm going to focus on the positive.
At the beginning of the season, I was optimistic that we would be over .500 and jockeying for position from 4-6. I thought that we would be relatively unprepared next to the other teams that would experience more continuity coming into the season.
We exceeded all of that. Individually, here's how I thought everyone did.
Danny Granger: Started slow. It really did seem like he was experiencing on-court chemistry imbalance. He was more tentative then I'd ever seen him, and when he went aggressive it wasn't quite channeled right. Just not clicking. Yet here we are at the end of the season and thanks to a monster post all-star break run, he's ended the season with 54% TS, while playing the kind of defense we wanted out of him for the last two seasons. He's actually ended the season being the most productive he's been since his MIP campaign.
Roy Hibbert: The questions about his strength and foul trouble and mental toughness were erased when he became an all-star. He gained strength physically and mentally. I want to focus on two areas of the game where his progress interested me. First, his free throws got worse. Early on, when he was around 65% for the season, I started noticing that he was missing everything long, and I'm sure I pointed that out a few times. He was getting used to his strength. He adjusted and is back at 71% to end the season. The second area where his strength played a major factor was rebounding. Rik Smits is no longer a fair comparison. While Smits still has more offensive firepower than Hibbert (which might not be the case given Hibbert's offseason focus) Hibbert has surpassed his legacy on defense and on the boards. Hibbert is essentially a double-digit rebounder and his feel for rebounding was much more improved this season.
David West: Worst case scenario his knee is shot and he is a corpse. Best case scenario he returns to all-star form. While 31-year-old David West isn't at his prime, he has been worth every penny. How many times have we needed a bucket this season and West drops a jumper or hammers it in for a hook or, failing to score, destroys the bejesus out of somebody, doing that thing where he pushes his jersey up with one hand? Like Granger, he has got himself going post all-star break and despite having lost agility, he fits this team like a glove. I thought he would need some time to get into it, too. Instead he had two double-doubles in the first 3 games.
Paul George: He started the season much stronger than he ended it. But it wasn't about production. For Paul George I only want to point to one game. Against the defending champion Dallas Mavericks, on their home floor, he posted 30 points, 9 rebounds, 5 assists, 5 steals and 1 block for good measure, while not turning it over once. He did this on 7-11 from beyond the arc. It's not like he's going to average these numbers over a season (most likely not...) but it shows the promise in him. If he fills in the small but significant gaps in his game, he can be really special. With that being said, he met expectations for a sophomore, getting picked as a starter for the Rookie-Sophomore challenge and lighting it up (with the lights off) in the dunk contest. The 3rd season jump will be riveting basketball.
Darren Collison: I'm used to watching Pacers point guards and wincing. I'm not gonna lie. There was some wincing this season. However, it was less than I expected. I trusted the coaches in their utilization of Collison and Vogel's willingness to sit him for key stretches. The point guard position in the NBA is hard to master if you don't have the instincts for it. There isn't a player on the Pacers roster with a complete set of those instincts. I expected Collison to be a game manager, and he was just that, getting his shots in opportunistically and having the best turnover ratio of his career (23rd among qualified leaders, 2 below Rose, 13 ABOVE Williams and 16 above Wall). A positive contributor to the team's 7th-best turnover rate.
George Hill: Right at the heels of Collison comes George Hill. An early season comparison for him was Jason Terry, an important scoring PG who, despite being a bench player, would be very important. He's replacing Collison in what I feel (and the coaches describe) is a "you're not bad, he's just better" benching of Collison. Like Granger he was tentative among new teammates, but not knowing him, I learned to love him quickly because I like his fun off-the-court demeanor and how it's all business on the court. I think he's great for this team in any capacity, so it'll be interesting to see the guards situation for the Pacers next season.
Leandro Barbosa: In a short time, he's already become a fan favorite and really hit the ground running. His shooting from inside the arc isn't so good, but he's been sinking timely 3's at a very good rate, so I'm not complaining yet, especially for the price. His passing has been good, and he's been what the bench has needed to become a complete deep threat.
Dahntay Jones: When the season started I thought smashmouth basketball was going to have a place for him. With the development of George and the acquisition of Barbosa, he's become the odd man out. While he's played, though, he's actually been a good threat from the corners, but he commits too many fouls on both ends of the floor. I personally like him, and I feel like he's a positive presence in the locker room and great for the camaraderie of the team.
Tyler Hansbrough: He hasn't really disappointed, nor has he impressed. He gets some points and annoys people a lot. I imagine he's really good in practice and makes everyone else work harder. His hard work and flailing isn't really working out for him on the court, though. The refs don't seem to like him, and his jumper was weaker this season, as he's just had less shots overall and he is a rhythm shooter. He'll need to get other options so that he has something else to go to when he can't get to the line or make jumpers.
Lou Amundson: Louuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu. He's great. Anything he gets is usually just gravy.
Lance Stephenson: Still a lot of potential, but still very raw. His jumper was inconsistent. When he shot it properly it was accurate, but he has a tendency to let old habits creep in. The same is true for his decision-making. He's what I would expect out of a 2nd-round project player.
AJ Price: I felt he took a step back. He has not been as consistent shooting the ball, but that could just be because of sparse minutes. Still, with Hill gone and Collison gone, there were times when he couldn't get the ball near the net.
Jeff Pendergraph: Optimistically, he could be a long-term backup on this team at the PF spot.
Kyrylo Fesenko: Stanko who?
Jeff Foster: Great guy. Retired always being a positive to the team no matter how bad his game or body was. No mean feat.