Image

Knicks & Pacers deal

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

Btrue2life
Freshman
Posts: 69
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 16, 2013

Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#1 » by Btrue2life » Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:13 pm

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... de/6506628
Knicks rec's: Hibbert & Scola. Indy rec's: Bargnani, Calderón, & Dalembert.
I like this deal for both teams
Pacers get Bargnani's expiring contract, Calderón to start with Hill they can switch off offensively & defensively as pg & sg, they get Dalembert to make up for the defense & shot blocking they lose with Hibbert.
Knicks do the deal the get big time rim protector in Hibbert & solid backup pf Scola
Indy starting 5 with George injured would be:
Sf: Copeland or Miles, Pf: West, C: Bargnani, Pg: Calderón, Sg: Hill.
Knicks New starting 5 taking into consideration that a traditional Pg is not needed:
Sf: Melo, Pf: Amare, C: Hibbert, Pg: Shumpert, Sg: JR.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#2 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:05 pm

As was stated on the trade forum, it's clearly a bad deal for Indy it's neither a rebuilding deal, as there are no rebuilding pieces coming to Indy, nor a win now deal as it returns lesser win now pieces for our better win now pieces.

There's just not much of a matchup for a deal between NY and Indy at this point.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#3 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:25 pm

Even if we did like Calderon, we could really only offer up something like Scola + Mahinmi for Calderon/Acy. You could waive Scola and the resulting cap savings would also save another $8-ish million in repeater tax this year.

Then, next offseason you have your backup/spot starter center minutes locked up in Mahinmi and you have an extra $3m in cap space to spend next Summer.

Clearly not a great offer, but it's about all we can do. Maybe a 2nd here or there, but that's about it. Clearly not a great offer for you either, unless you value expirings a ton.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
boomershadow
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 5,981
And1: 7,480
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
Location: Naptown
   

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#4 » by boomershadow » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:30 pm

I just really don't think there's a team out there willing to give us a player anywhere near Hibbert in return for him.
User avatar
SmashMouthRod
Rookie
Posts: 1,137
And1: 232
Joined: May 31, 2012
   

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#5 » by SmashMouthRod » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:12 pm

:crazy: Plenty of reasons why I wouldnt even consider a deal with the knicks; And this deal is just a bad deal for any reason. If Indy wanted to dump salary they could do better than that.
EuroPacer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,983
And1: 785
Joined: Jul 07, 2013
 

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#6 » by EuroPacer » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:17 pm

Btrue2life wrote:http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6506628
Knicks rec's: Hibbert & Scola. Indy rec's: Bargnani, Calderón, & Dalembert.
I like this deal for both teams
Pacers get Bargnani's expiring contract, Calderón to start with Hill they can switch off offensively & defensively as pg & sg, they get Dalembert to make up for the defense & shot blocking they lose with Hibbert.
Knicks do the deal the get big time rim protector in Hibbert & solid backup pf Scola
Indy starting 5 with George injured would be:
Sf: Copeland or Miles, Pf: West, C: Bargnani, Pg: Calderón, Sg: Hill.
Knicks New starting 5 taking into consideration that a traditional Pg is not needed:
Sf: Melo, Pf: Amare, C: Hibbert, Pg: Shumpert, Sg: JR.


Hahaha. Hahahahaha. Muahahahaha. Hihihihihihih.

Oh man. Thanks.
Vogel is Dutch for Bird.
Dunkin Dutchman
Ballboy
Posts: 12
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 16, 2012

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#7 » by Dunkin Dutchman » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:38 pm

I really like this tra.......Oh wait, no it's terrible.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,040
And1: 4,342
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#8 » by basketballwacko2 » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:01 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:Even if we did like Calderon, we could really only offer up something like Scola + Mahinmi for Calderon/Acy. You could waive Scola and the resulting cap savings would also save another $8-ish million in repeater tax this year.

Then, next offseason you have your backup/spot starter center minutes locked up in Mahinmi and you have an extra $3m in cap space to spend next Summer.

Clearly not a great offer, but it's about all we can do. Maybe a 2nd here or there, but that's about it. Clearly not a great offer for you either, unless you value expirings a ton.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


No I wouldn't do that, we need Ian at the back up Center spot. If I'm taking Calderon we could offer CJ Watson, although I don't want to trade any of our CJ's that makes more sense. Scola and CJ for Calderon. The cut Scola and save a ton of money. I'd like to get a #1 in the deal as well if we're saving them $8-9 million. But I know they don't have some of their picks down the road so maybe a 2nd or something. 8-)
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#9 » by Scoot McGroot » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:04 pm

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:Even if we did like Calderon, we could really only offer up something like Scola + Mahinmi for Calderon/Acy. You could waive Scola and the resulting cap savings would also save another $8-ish million in repeater tax this year.

Then, next offseason you have your backup/spot starter center minutes locked up in Mahinmi and you have an extra $3m in cap space to spend next Summer.

Clearly not a great offer, but it's about all we can do. Maybe a 2nd here or there, but that's about it. Clearly not a great offer for you either, unless you value expirings a ton.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


No I wouldn't do that, we need Ian at the back up Center spot. If I'm taking Calderon we could offer CJ Watson, although I don't want to trade any of our CJ's that makes more sense. Scola and CJ for Calderon. The cut Scola and save a ton of money. I'd like to get a #1 in the deal as well if we're saving them $8-9 million. But I know they don't have some of their picks down the road so maybe a 2nd or something. 8-)


Theoretically, yeah, we'd like to keep Mahinmi, but moving his future salary helps offset the cost of Calderon's future salary, and we take a chance on Allen and Whittington to play some backup 5 minutes.

Otherwise, I was thinking to keep Watson, and start Calderon and Hill together, now that Lance is gone. Watson would still chew up backup PG minutes.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,040
And1: 4,342
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#10 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:45 am

Scoot McGroot wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:Even if we did like Calderon, we could really only offer up something like Scola + Mahinmi for Calderon/Acy. You could waive Scola and the resulting cap savings would also save another $8-ish million in repeater tax this year.

Then, next offseason you have your backup/spot starter center minutes locked up in Mahinmi and you have an extra $3m in cap space to spend next Summer.

Clearly not a great offer, but it's about all we can do. Maybe a 2nd here or there, but that's about it. Clearly not a great offer for you either, unless you value expirings a ton.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


No I wouldn't do that, we need Ian at the back up Center spot. If I'm taking Calderon we could offer CJ Watson, although I don't want to trade any of our CJ's that makes more sense. Scola and CJ for Calderon. The cut Scola and save a ton of money. I'd like to get a #1 in the deal as well if we're saving them $8-9 million. But I know they don't have some of their picks down the road so maybe a 2nd or something. 8-)


Theoretically, yeah, we'd like to keep Mahinmi, but moving his future salary helps offset the cost of Calderon's future salary, and we take a chance on Allen and Whittington to play some backup 5 minutes.

Otherwise, I was thinking to keep Watson, and start Calderon and Hill together, now that Lance is gone. Watson would still chew up backup PG minutes.



Yeah I kinda ran that around in my head, I don't like losing CJ but my idea was to start Calderon and Stuckey and bring George Hill off the bench as the primary back up at both guard spots. The 3 guard rotation would take the pressue of Hill and give a boost to the 2nd unit. I'd rather send Copeland in the deal and use Allen more at PF again keeping Ian and CJ if the Knicks would do that. Again if they are saving $8 million or more I'd think we could get a 2nd or even 2 considering they have no #1's to give.

IDK I'm ok with going into the season as we are I'm happy to have gotten CJ Fair hope he makes the team, I'd say the weak link is Whittington, park him in the DLeague and hope we can get him back next season.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#11 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:36 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:
No I wouldn't do that, we need Ian at the back up Center spot. If I'm taking Calderon we could offer CJ Watson, although I don't want to trade any of our CJ's that makes more sense. Scola and CJ for Calderon. The cut Scola and save a ton of money. I'd like to get a #1 in the deal as well if we're saving them $8-9 million. But I know they don't have some of their picks down the road so maybe a 2nd or something. 8-)


Theoretically, yeah, we'd like to keep Mahinmi, but moving his future salary helps offset the cost of Calderon's future salary, and we take a chance on Allen and Whittington to play some backup 5 minutes.

Otherwise, I was thinking to keep Watson, and start Calderon and Hill together, now that Lance is gone. Watson would still chew up backup PG minutes.


Again if they are saving $8 million or more I'd think we could get a 2nd or even 2 considering they have no #1's to give.


Possibly, but I was just of the assumption that since Calderon still has value as a player, and his new contract isn't horrendous anymore, he'd be worth something useful like Mahinmi or Scola and some expiring, without having to pay 2nds to dump.

basketballwacko2 wrote:IDK I'm ok with going into the season as we are I'm happy to have gotten CJ Fair hope he makes the team, I'd say the weak link is Whittington, park him in the DLeague and hope we can get him back next season.


Yup. I think that Whittington is not guaranteed to make the roster, and that the $25k guarantee was merely meant to garner goodwill and maybe some sense of loyalty, and get him parked in Ft. Wayne after he's cut in training camp.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#12 » by 8305 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:37 pm

I get the sense the Knicks value Calderon more than expiring contracts but, I suppose that could change if they determine that they aren't competitive sometime before the trade deadline. I'd be fine with a Calderon/Hill backcourt and if it took Mahamni to get him that would be fine too.
User avatar
Starkiller
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 269
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
     

Re: Knicks & Pacers deal 

Post#13 » by Starkiller » Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:35 pm

I've seen some bad trade ideas presented to us, but this one.........whew.
This ^

Return to Indiana Pacers