Raptors or Indiana
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 1:50 pm
I'm a raptors fan, butI would like to hear your honest opinion of whether your team is better than ours and why... and dw I won't be offended
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1401397
Wizop wrote:If we are a couple of years away, we shouldn't have signed Ellis. He's not as close to the edge as Gore and Johnson (the guys the Colts signed should any of you not be American football fans), but he's close enough that the front office must think we are in win now mode. Now Turner could be a couple of years away and DWest certainly agrees that this won't be our year. If the standard is getting past a healthy Cleveland, I'm not sure either team is up for that. Assuming they do change the playoff seeding to a straight 1-8, I think we'll both be shooting for the 2 or 3 so we don't hit Cleveland before the ECF.
Jermainevent wrote:Wizop wrote:If we are a couple of years away, we shouldn't have signed Ellis. He's not as close to the edge as Gore and Johnson (the guys the Colts signed should any of you not be American football fans), but he's close enough that the front office must think we are in win now mode. Now Turner could be a couple of years away and DWest certainly agrees that this won't be our year. If the standard is getting past a healthy Cleveland, I'm not sure either team is up for that. Assuming they do change the playoff seeding to a straight 1-8, I think we'll both be shooting for the 2 or 3 so we don't hit Cleveland before the ECF.
I don't really understand the logic of not signing Ellis if we are a couple are years away from competing for a Eastern Conference Title, he's still going to help keep us relevant. I see us winning around 45 games pushing for a 5th of 6th seed where I could see Toronto winning closer to 50 wins and a top three seed. I guess I should have specified that I feel like Toronto is a greater threat to Cleveland than we are, currently.
jarryd3107 wrote:Jermainevent wrote:Wizop wrote:If we are a couple of years away, we shouldn't have signed Ellis. He's not as close to the edge as Gore and Johnson (the guys the Colts signed should any of you not be American football fans), but he's close enough that the front office must think we are in win now mode. Now Turner could be a couple of years away and DWest certainly agrees that this won't be our year. If the standard is getting past a healthy Cleveland, I'm not sure either team is up for that. Assuming they do change the playoff seeding to a straight 1-8, I think we'll both be shooting for the 2 or 3 so we don't hit Cleveland before the ECF.
I don't really understand the logic of not signing Ellis if we are a couple are years away from competing for a Eastern Conference Title, he's still going to help keep us relevant. I see us winning around 45 games pushing for a 5th of 6th seed where I could see Toronto winning closer to 50 wins and a top three seed. I guess I should have specified that I feel like Toronto is a greater threat to Cleveland than we are, currently.
Agreed. As Bobby Marks has been saying this off season, it's not enough for teams to just have cap space to attract free agents any more. Teams need to be winning games or showing a plan. That's why Monroe picked Milwaukee over NY and LA.
So I like the Ellis signing for that reason, help us win 45 games and hopefully the next A-grade free agent we like will see himself as the missing piece.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
jarryd3107 wrote:Jermainevent wrote:Wizop wrote:If we are a couple of years away, we shouldn't have signed Ellis. He's not as close to the edge as Gore and Johnson (the guys the Colts signed should any of you not be American football fans), but he's close enough that the front office must think we are in win now mode. Now Turner could be a couple of years away and DWest certainly agrees that this won't be our year. If the standard is getting past a healthy Cleveland, I'm not sure either team is up for that. Assuming they do change the playoff seeding to a straight 1-8, I think we'll both be shooting for the 2 or 3 so we don't hit Cleveland before the ECF.
I don't really understand the logic of not signing Ellis if we are a couple are years away from competing for a Eastern Conference Title, he's still going to help keep us relevant. I see us winning around 45 games pushing for a 5th of 6th seed where I could see Toronto winning closer to 50 wins and a top three seed. I guess I should have specified that I feel like Toronto is a greater threat to Cleveland than we are, currently.
Agreed. As Bobby Marks has been saying this off season, it's not enough for teams to just have cap space to attract free agents any more. Teams need to be winning games or showing a plan. That's why Monroe picked Milwaukee over NY and LA.
So I like the Ellis signing for that reason, help us win 45 games and hopefully the next A-grade free agent we like will see himself as the missing piece.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Wizop wrote:If you can't be optimistic in July and August, you aren't a fan. This time of year we're all in love with our teams. Okay, maybe not Philly fans, but even they can believe there is a plan this time of year.
Pacer fans are going to like their team more. Reasons? Paul George and Frank Vogel. My internet friend from Toronto isn't sold on your coaching. I'll shoot him an email to try and coax him into joining this thread.
I have to admit that you gave our old big lineup fits, and our new lineup may take some time to gel. Power forward has been your weakness and now it may be ours unless PG really gets big minutes there or Turner manages to avoid being hazed by the refs for being a rookie.
EuroPacer wrote:
What I will say though is that we (Pistons)
Wizop wrote:My internet friend from Toronto isn't sold on your coaching. I'll shoot him an email to try and coax him into joining this thread.
Scoot McGroot wrote:EuroPacer wrote:
What I will say though is that we (Pistons)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL US?!?!?
Jermainevent wrote:Bump