RealGM

Curry shot 45 percent on 111 three-point attempts in 15.7 minutes per game over 44 appearances. If he is 1/2 as good as his brother I'd love to have him on our team. Offer Seth 4 yrs $29 million.

I don't see any harm in doing so. He played enough towards the end of last season to prove he can play the 1 pretty darn effectively. I'd offer him 3/18m with the 3rd season being a p/o. Bare minimum he would strengthen our effectiveness from deep.

I had the same idea but at no where near that price. Wasn't the QO much lower?

Sent from my SM-T237P using RealGM mobile app

Wizop wrote:I had the same idea but at no where near that price. Wasn't the QO much lower?

Sent from my SM-T237P using RealGM mobile app

Solo's QO was 2.3m and we saw what he got. I'm thinking Curry will get at least 6 per but no less than 5, based solely on current market conditions where role players are securing northward of 10m +.

Nope. I would rather give the minutes to Joe Young if were going to play a young guard. The team already has several small guards, meaning their will be plenty of small back court tandems. Indy needs a solid 6'5 or bigger guard that can defend the 2 or 3.

Teague/Young
Ellis/Stuckey

If we moved Stuckey for someone like a SF or a PF (think Gay, McRoberts, or Hawes), I would absolutely go after Curry. Otherwise, though, I'd rather have Young compete for minutes if we keep both Stuckey and Monta. Weird, I know, but makes sense to me.

If only GRob could shoot like a Curry.

Sent from my SM-T237P using RealGM mobile app

Committed to Dallas for 2 years/$6m.

Scoot McGroot wrote:Committed to Dallas for 2 years/$6m.

Thats peanuts, we should have signed him.

Clutch31 wrote:

Scoot McGroot wrote:Committed to Dallas for 2 years/$6m.

Thats peanuts, we should have signed him.

Meh. Maybe. I just can't feel strongly either way about it. Plus, that $3m this year could go a long way toward a Teague extension, or possibly signing someone else, like a Lance.

Scoot McGroot wrote:

Clutch31 wrote:

Scoot McGroot wrote:Committed to Dallas for 2 years/$6m.

Thats peanuts, we should have signed him.

Meh. Maybe. I just can't feel strongly either way about it. Plus, that $3m this year could go a long way toward a Teague extension, or possibly signing someone else, like a Lance.

I agree with you in the money part. I feel we should get rid of Stuckey and his contract.

Clutch31 wrote:I feel we should get rid of Stuckey and his contract.

His contract is pretty reasonable for a backup at this point. Now if we can get a better shooting guard, that's different, but if he's the first guard off the bench, his contract is no problem for me.

Clutch31 wrote:

Scoot McGroot wrote:

Clutch31 wrote:
Thats peanuts, we should have signed him.

Meh. Maybe. I just can't feel strongly either way about it. Plus, that $3m this year could go a long way toward a Teague extension, or possibly signing someone else, like a Lance.

I agree with you in the money part. I feel we should get rid of Stuckey and his contract.

I don't know about that. The bulk of free agency is over, and if we trade Stuckey and his contract, we would then need to overspend the $17m on another SG to try and replace Stuckey. There's just no one out there. And after seeing the contracts this offseason, I'm ok with Stuckey at 2 years and $7m per. He's good value on that deal.