Page 3 of 15

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:39 am
by asitter
Boneman2 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Boneman2 wrote:
I like it although I'd like to add more protection to our 2019 1st or remove it altogether. Keep in mind Jackson has negative trade value so it would detract from Drummond's declining value not too mention the Pacers take on a bit more annual salary. That's not the problem but what could be problematic is that they would take on in excess of $100 million in overall salary. If our 2019 pick lands outside the lottery then I'd be cool with it.


Are you thinking to play Turner more at the 4 than the 5?


As Asitter mentioned Turner and Drummond have varying strengths and weaknesses that seem to match up well. Myles played primarily at PF his rookie season and based off his production it is conceivable he could play the 4 again. With this package the obvious hope would be for Jax and Andre to revert back to 2015-16 form. Furthermore PG & Jax are friends so it is possible that a move like this could entice PG to stay the course.


My thoughts exactly. I see Turner as the 4, but still the primary rim defender on D. A lineup of:

Jackson
Robinson
George
Turner
Drummond

would be an improvement over 2017, assuming Jackson and Drummond return to 2016 form.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:51 am
by Global Game
Acquiring Alexis Ajinca, Will Barton, Wilson Chandler, and draft picks

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:14 am
by Wizop
Woj says Celts

Sent from my 831C using RealGM mobile app

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:09 am
by boomershadow
The Vertical podcast is saying that Boston/Indiana talks have stalled for the moment. I'm not terribly surprised. I was really hoping to see something happen, but if they weren't willing to do better than Minnesota's offer for Butler then I doubt they had an offer for George that would've blown us away.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:43 am
by pacers33granger
The poor value the Bulls got for Butler hurts us even more with a PG trade. He told everyone he wanted to stay and he gets an injured Lavine on the last year of his rookie deal, a disappointing older sophomore in Dunn, and 9 spots in the draft. Boston won't offer 3 for him. Not good.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:27 am
by SBM
I disagree that Bulls got poor value. They got 3 recent lottery picks. If the Pacers can get that they should be more than happy.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:08 pm
by Logan18
Hi!
What kind of offer would it take for the Nuggets to get George. We have plenty of assets, probably too many, and need to consolidate. Some of our young tradable players include: Mudiay, Trey Lyles, Tyler Lydon, and Hernangomez.

We also have vets we could trade, including Wilson Chandler, Will Barton, Kenneth Faried, and Jameer Nelson.

What kind of players/picks are the pacers looking for?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:24 pm
by Wizop
Logan18 wrote:Hi!
What kind of offer would it take for the Nuggets to get George.


we drafted a 4 so we need a 2/3 to play PG's minutes and a 1 if we don't resign Teague. Harris is a local kid and Juancho looks like a fit but you'd need to make the salary's match by adding higher paid players unless you have cap room.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:17 pm
by Green_teamer
Celtics fan here...if the rumors are true and we have a deal for George contigent on Heyward signing here Bradley and Crowder have to be apart of any deal. Bradley Crowder and either Smart or Jackson or Rozier.

let's say the offer ends up being Bradley Crowder Rozier LA 2018 if not phi/sac swap and either mephis 19 or bos 18 and clipper pick how do you guys feel about that? Obviousily if George hadn't of ruined his value this wouldn't be enough but in relation to offers the Lakers are offering now (Randle 27 and 28) I feel like this might be as good as it could get. Just trying to think of what it could be...and considering Ainge took The Brooklyn picks off the table for Butler even though he wasn't a flight risk it makes me skeptical he would offer them for George.

Keep in mind I don't know how much George allegedly agreeing to a 3 year extension would increase his value because just because he'd agree to resign here doesn't mean other places..Either way I'm sure you guys just want to get it over with

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:59 pm
by SBM
Bradley,Crowder,Tatum and 2 lottery picks is enough

Teague
Bradley
Tatum/Crowder
Thad
Myles Turner

Playoff team but not going anywhere, you would need those 2 lottery picks for major improvement.

Smart instead of Teague and you may not make playoffs but Smart is still going to want starting PG pay.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:29 pm
by Green_teamer
SBM wrote:Bradley,Crowder,Tatum and 2 lottery picks is enough

Teague
Bradley
Tatum/Crowder
Thad
Myles Turner

Playoff team but not going anywhere, you would need those 2 lottery picks for major improvement.

Smart instead of Teague and you may not make playoffs but Smart is still going to want starting PG pay.


That might be how much PG cost if he hadn't publicly stated he was leaving

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:59 pm
by Jake0890
People reporting this is the potential offer from Boston if they sign Hayward:

LAL/SAC
a non-BKN first round pick (MEM, LAC)
Jae Crowder
salary to match PG

Honestly, this is the best offer we've heard come through the pipeline. I'd take that offer in a heartbeat, 2 firsts is as good as we could possibly hope for. LAL/SAC will be a top 10 pick most likely and LAC could be as well if Griffin and Paul leave. Hopefully this happens.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:04 pm
by pacers33granger
SBM wrote:I disagree that Bulls got poor value. They got 3 recent lottery picks. If the Pacers can get that they should be more than happy.


Lavine is not a recent lottery pick and is coming off a major injury and nearly off his rookie contract. They got a lottery pick this year, but gave up 16 in a swap. And Dunn had a bad rookie season while being an older rookie. Pacers would be happy with that return, but it's a totally different situation where Butler wanted to stay in Chicago.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:08 pm
by pacers33granger
Jake0890 wrote:People reporting this is the potential offer from Boston if they sign Hayward:

LAL/SAC
a non-BKN first round pick (MEM, LAC)
Jae Crowder
salary to match PG

Honestly, this is the best offer we've heard come through the pipeline. I'd take that offer in a heartbeat, 2 firsts is as good as we could possibly hope for. LAL/SAC will be a top 10 pick most likely and LAC could be as well if Griffin and Paul leave. Hopefully this happens.


It's top 14 protected until 2020 when it becomes a 2nd in 2022. It's not a great pick. We would actually hope they keep Paul and Griffin so we'd get a 1st and not a further off 2nd. If they leave it's almost assuredly a 2nd as it's only for two years until it becomes a 2nd.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:37 pm
by Jake0890
pacers33granger wrote:
Jake0890 wrote:People reporting this is the potential offer from Boston if they sign Hayward:

LAL/SAC
a non-BKN first round pick (MEM, LAC)
Jae Crowder
salary to match PG

Honestly, this is the best offer we've heard come through the pipeline. I'd take that offer in a heartbeat, 2 firsts is as good as we could possibly hope for. LAL/SAC will be a top 10 pick most likely and LAC could be as well if Griffin and Paul leave. Hopefully this happens.


It's top 14 protected until 2020 when it becomes a 2nd in 2022. It's not a great pick. We would actually hope they keep Paul and Griffin so we'd get a 1st and not a further off 2nd. If they leave it's almost assuredly a 2nd as it's only for two years until it becomes a 2nd.


I was unaware that it defaulted to a second round pick. Perhaps Memphis would be the better pick as their guys get older, who knows.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:14 pm
by Green_teamer
Jake0890 wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
Jake0890 wrote:People reporting this is the potential offer from Boston if they sign Hayward:

LAL/SAC
a non-BKN first round pick (MEM, LAC)
Jae Crowder
salary to match PG

Honestly, this is the best offer we've heard come through the pipeline. I'd take that offer in a heartbeat, 2 firsts is as good as we could possibly hope for. LAL/SAC will be a top 10 pick most likely and LAC could be as well if Griffin and Paul leave. Hopefully this happens.


It's top 14 protected until 2020 when it becomes a 2nd in 2022. It's not a great pick. We would actually hope they keep Paul and Griffin so we'd get a 1st and not a further off 2nd. If they leave it's almost assuredly a 2nd as it's only for two years until it becomes a 2nd.


I was unaware that it defaulted to a second round pick. Perhaps Memphis would be the better pick as their guys get older, who knows.


The clipper pick is top 14 protected in 2019 and 2020. If still not conveyed it becomes a second rounder.

That Mephis pick is far better. Top 8 protected in 2019 top 6 protected in 2020 and unprotected in 2021.

And to match salaries the other player has to be Bradley..

So the offer would be

Bradley
Crowder
LAL 2018 protected[1 and 6-30] or better of Sacramento Phillidelphia 2019 pick [unless 1 than other one]
Clipper 2019 pick

Probably all conditioned on Heyward signing here. And if we whiff on free agency than we'd keep Bradley.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:16 pm
by pacers33granger
Green_teamer wrote:
Jake0890 wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:

The clipper pick is top 14 protected in 2019 and 2020. If still not conveyed it becomes 2 second rounders



RealGM says it only becomes a single second rounder:

2019 first round draft pick from L.A. Clippers
L.A. Clippers' 1st round pick to Boston (via Memphis) protected for selections 1-14 in 2019 and 1-14 in 2020; if the L.A. Clippers have not conveyed a 1st round pick to Boston by 2020, then the L.A. Clippers will instead convey their 2022 2nd round pick to Boston [L.A. Clippers-Memphis, 2/18/2016; Boston-Memphis, 6/23/2016]

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:31 pm
by Green_teamer
pacers33granger wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:
Jake0890 wrote:


RealGM says it only becomes a single second rounder:

2019 first round draft pick from L.A. Clippers
L.A. Clippers' 1st round pick to Boston (via Memphis) protected for selections 1-14 in 2019 and 1-14 in 2020; if the L.A. Clippers have not conveyed a 1st round pick to Boston by 2020, then the L.A. Clippers will instead convey their 2022 2nd round pick to Boston [L.A. Clippers-Memphis, 2/18/2016; Boston-Memphis, 6/23/2016]


Yeah just looked it up and your right my bad. I could of sworn it was 2 2nd rounders

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:50 pm
by pacers33granger
Green_teamer wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:


RealGM says it only becomes a single second rounder:

2019 first round draft pick from L.A. Clippers
L.A. Clippers' 1st round pick to Boston (via Memphis) protected for selections 1-14 in 2019 and 1-14 in 2020; if the L.A. Clippers have not conveyed a 1st round pick to Boston by 2020, then the L.A. Clippers will instead convey their 2022 2nd round pick to Boston [L.A. Clippers-Memphis, 2/18/2016; Boston-Memphis, 6/23/2016]


Yeah just looked it up and your right my bad. I could of sworn it was 2 2nd rounders


First one I've ever seen that is only a single 2nd. I had to re-read it a couple of times when I first noticed it.

Re: 2017 Offseason Trade Discussions

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:42 am
by Dupp
We're probably just a pawn in all of this but if cavs did get in on a 3 way that sent PG our way what kind of value does Thad have do you think?

Basically if we get George I'd like Thad as well but dunno if that's possible.