Page 1 of 1

Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:29 am
by Miller4ever
https://clutchpoints.com/timberwolves-news-david-kahn-turned-down-paul-george-jonny-flynn-trade-2010/

Thank god because Jonny Flynn could not get you Oladipo and Sabonis :P

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:38 am
by Grang33r
Miller4ever wrote:https://clutchpoints.com/timberwolves-news-david-kahn-turned-down-paul-george-jonny-flynn-trade-2010/

Thank god because Jonny Flynn could not get you Oladipo and Sabonis :P


Wow.

Although so many things wouldv'e changed. Probably no David West coming here. And several top-5 picks along the way.

Crazy though.

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:50 am
by BooomBaby
Good read, thanks.

Is Flynn even still in the league? LOL

Re: RE: Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:22 am
by UcanUwill
BooomBaby wrote:Good read, thanks.

Is Flynn even still in the league? LOL

He hasnt been for like 5 years now

Sent from my SM-A510F using RealGM mobile app

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:30 am
by winter_mute_13
Just to be clear, it was "the draft pick that would have turned to PG" rather than PG outright. Granted, teams probably have a good idea of who was available by then.

To play along with the what-if scenario further, what if Pacers did that deal in 2010, then in 2011 they kept Kawhi at #15 instead of trading him for George Hill since we already had Flynn and there would now be a vacancy at SF? Crazy stuff indeed.

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:15 pm
by SmashMouthRod
If Larry was successful completing this trade, and Granger fell apart on us in the same time frame we wouldve stayed a bad team even longer. Wow.

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:41 pm
by xxSnEaKyPxx
So we would have had a young PG?

Which means, we wouldn't have traded Kawhi for Hill?

...and Kawhi seems more loyal than PG...

DAMMIT! Why did this trade not work out!?!?

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:20 am
by basketballwacko2
Just think of all the high draft picks we missed out on! Anthony Bennett, Derrick Williams, Thomas Robinson and Dante Exum could have all been Pacers.

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:22 am
by basketballwacko2
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:So we would have had a young PG?

Which means, we wouldn't have traded Kawhi for Hill?

...and Kawhi seems more loyal than PG...

DAMMIT! Why did this trade not work out!?!?


Or we could have just drafted Jeff Teague in 2009 instead of Tyler Hansbrough and then not needed to make the deal to get Hill.

Re: Apparently PG for Jonny Flynn was a thing

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:57 am
by boomershadow
basketballwacko2 wrote:Just think of all the high draft picks we missed out on! Anthony Bennett, Derrick Williams, Thomas Robinson and Dante Exum could have all been Pacers.


And Jordan Hill could have bee....oh, wait. Seriously though, this is actually my main reason for being against tanking.