Page 1 of 2

Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:47 pm
by ahartleyvu
Let’s consider 2 things

1- We won’t be able to sign a top FA
2- If a second/third tier star is available, we most likely have to over pay

Parsons + 4 for Bogdanovic + Jefferson + 23... gonna go ahead and assume this wouldn’t be enough for the 4th pick.

Bayless + 10th pick for Jefferson + cash + 23
Bayless + Fultz for Jefferson + Joseph or Bog + 23

I think Philly might consider that first one assuming that gives them leverage to sign Lebron. They cut Jeff, sign Lebron and still could flip Fultz + 23 for an established player.

Deng + Ball/Kuzma for Jefferson + Joseph + 23?

I just think we can capitalize on Jefferson being unguaranteed while these teams fight for Lebron

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:56 pm
by Scoot McGroot
ahartleyvu wrote:Let’s consider 2 things

1- We won’t be able to sign a top FA
2- If a second/third tier star is available, we most likely have to over pay

Parsons + 4 for Bogdanovic + Jefferson + 23... gonna go ahead and assume this wouldn’t be enough for the 4th pick.

Bayless + 10th pick for Jefferson + cash + 23
Bayless + Fultz for Jefferson + Joseph or Bog + 23

I think Philly might consider that first one assuming that gives them leverage to sign Lebron. They cut Jeff, sign Lebron and still could flip Fultz + 23 for an established player.

Deng + Ball/Kuzma for Jefferson + Joseph + 23?

I just think we can capitalize on Jefferson being unguaranteed while these teams fight for Lebron



Jefferson is $4m guaranteed, so doesn’t fit the need for many other teams when here looking to get off money. He wouldn’t save that much from Bayless deal.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:58 pm
by Scoot McGroot
Also, in order to deal Bogs or Collison, we have to fully guarantee their salaries for next year, which would defeat the purpose for the teams looking to dump salary by dealing for them.

If we want to take on salary dumps, look for the Pacers to waive Bogs/Collison to do so.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:04 pm
by Wizop
ahartleyvu wrote:Let’s consider 2 things

1- We won’t be able to sign a top FA
2- If a second/third tier star is available, we most likely have to over pay


I do not accept the premise. why throw in the towel before the fight even starts?

do we even want to take on a max contract? Vic will get one. Turner will get a big contract too. even Sabonis will eventually get paid. I doubt that it is possible to fit three max or near max contracts on one roster without paying luxury tax.

did we overpay for Collison? Bogie? Booker? not many teams have cap room which makes us a destination.

I have no problem taking on a one or two year high dollar contract but I expect to get young players and picks with such a contract and have no interest in giving away real assets for the privilege. we're in position to sign a solid backup now without giving up a thing. next summer we'll be in an even better position.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:14 pm
by pizza guy
Parsons' contract is really bad, but I'd seriously consider a deal for that #4 pick. The top-5 in this draft is really solid and would immediately pay off. Parsons probably won't stay healthy, but if he did, he could play a role off the bench. We don't get many chances at picks that high, so it's something I'd really look at. If a deal can be done without giving up our draft pick or our young core guys, I think it'd be hard to pass up. Given the cost of Parsons' deal, I'd hesitate to include Myles or Domas and probably pass unless we're drafting Bamba.

If you buy into the idea that top-tier free agents will never come to Indy, this is the kind of flexibility we have to take advantage of. Unless Pritchard is just really confident that we'll have another strong season and go into summer '19 with huge cap space, and see what happens there.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:28 pm
by Wizop
ahartleyvu wrote:Bayless + 10th pick for Jefferson + cash + 23
Bayless + Fultz for Jefferson + Joseph or Bog + 23

I think Philly might consider that first one assuming that gives them leverage to sign Lebron. They cut Jeff, sign Lebron and still could flip Fultz + 23 for an established player.


I can't see Philly wanting more picks in this draft. they currently have 10, 26, 38, 39, 56, and 60. they should either be selling picks or looking to trade picks this year for picks in future years.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:16 pm
by Scoot McGroot
Wizop wrote:
ahartleyvu wrote:Bayless + 10th pick for Jefferson + cash + 23
Bayless + Fultz for Jefferson + Joseph or Bog + 23

I think Philly might consider that first one assuming that gives them leverage to sign Lebron. They cut Jeff, sign Lebron and still could flip Fultz + 23 for an established player.


I can't see Philly wanting more picks in this draft. they currently have 10, 26, 38, 39, 56, and 60. they should either be selling picks or looking to trade picks this year for picks in future years.


Yup. They’re most likely to try and attach one of their picks in the 30’s, or the 26 if absolutely necessary, to Bayless to dump him for pure cap space.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:39 pm
by granger05
ESPN article on trades they'd like to see in the draft. We made the cut.

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/underestimated23835835/2018-nba-draft-trades-best-deals-see

Nuggets cut costs
Nuggets get: Al Jefferson and No. 23

Pacers get: Kenneth Faried and No. 14

Bobby Marks: Indiana's cost of moving up nine in this trade is taking back Faried's $13.7 million expiring contract. Because of the uncertainty with Thaddeus Young potentially opting out of his salary for 2018-19, the Pacers could accomplish two goals: acquiring a lottery pick to strengthen the depth in their backcourt -- in Lonnie Walker IV or Zhaire Smith -- while also getting a player in Faried who does not impact cap flexibility in 2019-20. For that season, the Pacers will have only Victor Oladipo, Domantas Sabonis and their 2018 first-round pick under contract. Center Myles Turner will be a restricted free agent.

The Nuggets falling back nine slots would be purely a financial decision. With the pending $147 million max contract of Nikola Jokic, Denver is headed toward the luxury tax and could lose free agent Will Barton. Jefferson has $4 million of his $10 million contract guaranteed and would be waived prior to his July 2 guarantee date. Once waived, Denver would stretch his contract over three seasons and incur a $1.3 million annual cap hit.

Because Jefferson was signed prior to the most recent collective bargaining agreement, his full salary and not the guaranteed portion would count in a trade.

The trade would save Denver $50 million in salary and luxury tax if Barton is brought back on a $8 million starting salary. Electing not to bring back the guard would see the Nuggets fall beneath the luxury tax threshold.


Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:18 am
by basketballwacko2
Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, in order to deal Bogs or Collison, we have to fully guarantee their salaries for next year, which would defeat the purpose for the teams looking to dump salary by dealing for them.

If we want to take on salary dumps, look for the Pacers to waive Bogs/Collison to do so.


If the pacers waived them could they then resign them after July 1st?

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:41 pm
by xxSnEaKyPxx
Yea, I would gladly take on some bad contracts if it helped get us a decent pick or young prospect that fits our core.

Cap space means absolutely nothing when you're the Indiana Pacers when it comes to FAs. Sure, we can sign a few older role players, but we are a team that needs to add to our future core. We aren't going to find those guys in FA.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:42 pm
by basketballwacko2
Al Jefferson for Ian Mahinmi and #15.

Washington has tax issues coming.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:05 pm
by Wizop
I found it interesting that in the presser online at the Star the Pacer FO guy said something about whether have pick, 11, 19 or 23. 11 is Charlotte and 19 is the middle one of Atlanta's three. did he slip and mention picks that are in play? 11 is a lot better than 14 or 15 which aren't much better than 19 to me.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:46 pm
by Tom White
Wizop wrote:I found it interesting that in the presser online at the Star the Pacer FO guy said something about whether have pick, 11, 19 or 23. 11 is Charlotte and 19 is the middle one of Atlanta's three. did he slip and mention picks that are in play? 11 is a lot better than 14 or 15 which aren't much better than 19 to me.


You mean the interview with Ryan Carr? I think he was just spouting out numbers off the cuff. Didn't read more into it. Would be interesting if there was more to it though.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:47 pm
by MUpacersSIC
Wizop wrote:I found it interesting that in the presser online at the Star the Pacer FO guy said something about whether have pick, 11, 19 or 23. 11 is Charlotte and 19 is the middle one of Atlanta's three. did he slip and mention picks that are in play? 11 is a lot better than 14 or 15 which aren't much better than 19 to me.


Had the same thought.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Re: RE: Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:16 am
by Wizop
Tom White wrote:You mean the interview with Ryan Carr? I think he was just spouting out numbers off the cuff. Didn't read more into it. Would be interesting if there was more to it though.


yes, that interview. could be both. random numbers that came to mind because they'd been studied.

Sent from my phone.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:52 am
by SmashMouthRod
I would entertain the Memphis bad contract scenario or the Charlotte situation. I think either of those can help the team a lot. Most preferably the Grizzlies number 4 pick. But if Kemba could be had attached to Batums bad deal, I would consider it. It would create an interesting starting lineup and overall strong rotation.

Walker/Collison
Oladipo/Stephenson
Batum/ Stephenson
Young/Leaf
Turner/Sabonis

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:41 am
by pizza guy
SmashMouthRod wrote:I would entertain the Memphis bad contract scenario or the Charlotte situation. I think either of those can help the team a lot. Most preferably the Grizzlies number 4 pick. But if Kemba could be had attached to Batums bad deal, I would consider it. It would create an interesting starting lineup and overall strong rotation.

Walker/Collison
Oladipo/Stephenson
Batum/ Stephenson
Young/Leaf
Turner/Sabonis


I'd rather take on Marvin Williams than Batum, I think. But either way, I'd be thrilled if we end up with Kemba. I think he and Dipo could do work together, and I think Kemba's a great fit in the locker room and would re-sign here (plus we'd have his Bird rights, making it a little easier to re-sign him).

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:24 pm
by SmashMouthRod
pizza guy wrote:
SmashMouthRod wrote:I would entertain the Memphis bad contract scenario or the Charlotte situation. I think either of those can help the team a lot. Most preferably the Grizzlies number 4 pick. But if Kemba could be had attached to Batums bad deal, I would consider it. It would create an interesting starting lineup and overall strong rotation.

Walker/Collison
Oladipo/Stephenson
Batum/ Stephenson
Young/Leaf
Turner/Sabonis


I'd rather take on Marvin Williams than Batum, I think. But either way, I'd be thrilled if we end up with Kemba. I think he and Dipo could do work together, and I think Kemba's a great fit in the locker room and would re-sign here (plus we'd have his Bird rights, making it a little easier to re-sign him).


Mr inconsistent Marvin? Over Batum? Im sure Charlotte would prefer that too.

Watch on YouTube

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:20 pm
by Wizop
wiretap has Bucks offering Dellavedova. trade checker says we have cap room to absorb the contract (I put in Betts to have something). strangely including Joe Young didn't work. anyway, I'd take him to trade up from 23 to 17.

Re: Trade for bad contracts?

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:40 pm
by Scoot McGroot
Wizop wrote:wiretap has Bucks offering Dellavedova. trade checker says we have cap room to absorb the contract (I put in Betts to have something). strangely including Joe Young didn't work. anyway, I'd take him to trade up from 23 to 17.


Joe Young is a "pending free agent" and untradeable until his team option is exercised one way or the other.

As for Dellavedova? He's got 2 more years fully guaranteed at $9.6m. I'd want a lot more than just trading up from 23 to 17 for his contract.