Veteran leadership
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2025 5:08 pm
Looking back on the Pacers' last team with legitimate championship aspirations, the PG/Hibbert/West crew certainly seemed to have a great chance to bring an NBA title to Indiana. But it all seemed to combust during the 2013-14 season. From a shaky finish to the regular season, to a frustrating 7 game series against the 8th seeded Hawks, to a 6 game loss to the Heat, the wheels seemed to fall off around this time.
There were certainly some elements of that Pacers roster that looked vulnerable, which may have made such a downfall inevitable. But a lot of blame has been placed on some seemingly minor roster moves, such as signing Andrew Bynum and trading Danny Granger for Evan Turner. The Pacers added some guys who didn't seem to work well in the locker room. But they also removed a veteran presence in Granger. That subtraction has been blamed for that Pacers crew's downfall, as well as the additions.
That make me wonder, as the current Pacers team continues to inspire with a miraculous Game 1 win against the Thunder, how much influence a player like James Johnson might be having. The team as a whole seems to have such poise and toughness against any odds. Johnson has certainly been the subject of some discontent among fans, being a guy who basically never plays. Why not stash a younger prospect at the end of the bench? Shouldn't it be up to the coaches to provide the sort of value that Johnson does?
I contend that maybe a veteran bench player is able to provide a different sort of influence than they would as a coach. Being a player who goes through practices with all the other guys, and being even just theoretically able to step onto the floor during a game, might give him a sort of credibility that he wouldn't have as a coach. The team seems to have internalized his best attributes, and is thriving because of it.
How much credit do you think Johnson deserves as part of this crazy run?
There were certainly some elements of that Pacers roster that looked vulnerable, which may have made such a downfall inevitable. But a lot of blame has been placed on some seemingly minor roster moves, such as signing Andrew Bynum and trading Danny Granger for Evan Turner. The Pacers added some guys who didn't seem to work well in the locker room. But they also removed a veteran presence in Granger. That subtraction has been blamed for that Pacers crew's downfall, as well as the additions.
That make me wonder, as the current Pacers team continues to inspire with a miraculous Game 1 win against the Thunder, how much influence a player like James Johnson might be having. The team as a whole seems to have such poise and toughness against any odds. Johnson has certainly been the subject of some discontent among fans, being a guy who basically never plays. Why not stash a younger prospect at the end of the bench? Shouldn't it be up to the coaches to provide the sort of value that Johnson does?
I contend that maybe a veteran bench player is able to provide a different sort of influence than they would as a coach. Being a player who goes through practices with all the other guys, and being even just theoretically able to step onto the floor during a game, might give him a sort of credibility that he wouldn't have as a coach. The team seems to have internalized his best attributes, and is thriving because of it.
How much credit do you think Johnson deserves as part of this crazy run?