Image

Tinsley SUSPENDED Wed night

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

jking
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 27, 2007

Tinsley SUSPENDED Wed night 

Post#1 » by jking » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:34 pm

Apparently it actually wasn't an injury, they just made that up, he was suspended..........

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a ... 2/SPORTS04
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#2 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:57 pm

Nice catch...thanks.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
jking
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 27, 2007

 

Post#3 » by jking » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:12 pm

I'm wondering what he did? And if it's gonna be more than 1 game......
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

 

Post#4 » by Liqourish » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:14 pm

I really like the changes the Pacers have made to the team. Tinsley seems to be one of the last malcontents on the team.

Nice win over Golden State!!
PacerGuy
Analyst
Posts: 3,126
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Location: Indy

 

Post#5 » by PacerGuy » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:40 pm

Film session altercation....hmmmm.... Did someone throw in the end of the PHX game by chance? :dontknow:
Larry Bird, You are now on the Clock! ( 3/24/08 )
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:57 pm

I have a feeling we'll be shopping him over the next month.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#7 » by FreeRon » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:24 pm

If it was an incident during a film session I don't see it being more than one game. Harrison only got 5 for substance abuse. It was probably just to send a message. I do think we'll be shopping him, though, and that we'll get back less talent if we trade him.
User avatar
notque
Veteran
Posts: 2,857
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Location: Tempe AZ

 

Post#8 » by notque » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:25 pm

We won't get back less talent if we send him to New York...
Image
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#9 » by FreeRon » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:58 pm

You don't think so? I don't think New York has anyone with MORE talent now ;)
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#10 » by jeremy1215 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:58 pm

Straight up for Ridnour. Seattle is looking to trade Rid for a point guard and we are looking to trade Tinsley for a point guard. Its a perfect trade.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:03 pm

Not to start up a trade thread here, but I love Jamal Crawford. The way Isiah thinks, I'm almost certain he'd swap them...and it'll work through the CBA.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
mizzoupacers
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,120
And1: 12
Joined: May 27, 2004

 

Post#12 » by mizzoupacers » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:04 pm

Geez, but having Tinsley on our team is depressing.

The Pacers need to cut ties with him. But since we have no other legit point guard, and because he is so deeply into "our problem for your problem" trade territory, it's almost hopeless.

We can trade him for a better talent who is even more of a disruptive presence. Or a less disruptive guy who is also less talented. Or someone whose talent/disruption quotients cancel each other out to roughly the same extent that Tinsley's do.

I'm back to thinking the Pacers' #1 priority in next summer's draft is a pg who rids the team of its dependence on Tinsley. :pray: Tinsley is just never going to take us anywhere we want to go.
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#13 » by jeremy1215 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:11 pm

If we trade him for Ridnour our point guard situation stays the same, plus I'm in belief that Luke just needs a change of scenery before he proves to be a legit point guard.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#14 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:14 pm

I don't know about Ridnour.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
PacerGuy
Analyst
Posts: 3,126
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Location: Indy

 

Post#15 » by PacerGuy » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:37 pm

Not sure Seattle wants Tin's contract either.
Luke would not be bad, but not sure he is the answer.
I am not against the Crawford deal - maybe add Harrison for R. Morris?
JC would give us a true SG & a scorer - I question his "team" forsight though, as he tends to be a bit of a "flick". His contract is worrysome too, so not sure how we could add to help us out there either...
Larry Bird, You are now on the Clock! ( 3/24/08 )
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#16 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:38 pm

PacerGuy wrote:I am not against the Crawford deal - maybe add Harrison for R. Morris?


I'm a fan of Hulk, but not sure we could rid ourselves of our latest disciplinary problems in one deal.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#17 » by count55 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:49 pm

My big problem with Jamal Crawford is that he's basically lost everywhere he's been, and he's owed over $8 million more than Tinsley over the same four year period. This year's salary alone would vault us over the tax threshhold.

As nice as it would be to be rid of the problems surrounding Tinsley, the truth is that an incident like this makes it harder for us to move him.

This is like the fifth or sixth time that Tinsley's done something that was seemingly sure to end his tenure here. The guy clearly has 9 lives in Indy.

I don't see TPTB just dumping him, and I don't see them going over the tax threshhold to move him. Right, wrong, or indifferent, they are not going to intentionally go into the tank this season.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#18 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:56 pm

You're probably right on all accounts Count (hey that kinda rhymed), but I see New York as the most likely destination for Jamal because Isiah would probably have a "solid body part" for acquiring new talent and his old "boy" in Jamaal. From what I've heard, Knicks' fans would go nuts for J.T. as well.

I used to think that ridding ourselves of Jamaal without a true PG in return would end us, but lately I'm learning that's not the case. We played in one of the most inspiring games of the season last night against Golden State, without J.T. and because without Jermaine (and Hulk and Ike to boot).
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
notque
Veteran
Posts: 2,857
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Location: Tempe AZ

 

Post#19 » by notque » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:29 pm

I do not want Crawford at all.

Tinsley for someone that doesn't seem like a headcase.
Image
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#20 » by jeremy1215 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:11 pm

If we did the Crawford deal, look at our rotation. As I would see it anyway.

Diener/Daniels
Crawford/Rush
Granger/Daniels
Dunleavy/Diogu
O'Neal/Murphy

Return to Indiana Pacers