Image

Pacers Draft Board. #3 on board.

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

Who should be #3 on the Pacers draft board?

O.J. Mayo
14
47%
Jerryd Bayless
9
30%
Brook Lopez
3
10%
Eric Gordon
2
7%
DeAndre Jordan
0
No votes
Anthony Randolph
1
3%
Danilo Gallinari
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
 
Total votes: 30

xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Pacers Draft Board. #3 on board. 

Post#1 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed May 14, 2008 5:05 pm

Heres where it gets interesting. Rose and Beasley blew out the first two. Lets see who we think should be 3rd on the Pacers draft board.

Pacers Draft Board:
1. Derrick Rose
2. Michael Beasley
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#2 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed May 14, 2008 5:06 pm

Once again, I made a post for "Other" but it didn't come through. If you think someone else should be #3 on our draft board, let me know and I will count it.

I think Jerryd Bayless should be 3rd on our board. He fills a need and has good size for the PG position.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#3 » by FreeRon » Wed May 14, 2008 5:20 pm

Sorry, but I had to go with Lopez. I like Bayless, but I think even with Tinsley injured so often we have a better situation at PG. I think a large part of my vote was also towards getting a C who would take minutes from Murphy so he'd think a little more about jacking up crazy shots.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

 

Post#4 » by PR07 » Wed May 14, 2008 5:29 pm

Now's where it gets interesting. I think it's Jerryd Bayless. PG is probably our biggest need, and I think he's going to be a really good if not great one.
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#5 » by count55 » Wed May 14, 2008 6:15 pm

DGrangeRx33 wrote:Once again, I made a post for "Other" but it didn't come through. If you think someone else should be #3 on our draft board, let me know and I will count it.

I think Jerryd Bayless should be 3rd on our board. He fills a need and has good size for the PG position.


I added the "Other" option...now, I'm about to pick it...If we're in third, I'd put it on the market, looking for hopefully a pick later in the top-10 or 15 plus a player, or a veteran player.

If I couldn't find a deal to my liking, I'd probably put Bayless and Mayo (ugh) in a hat and draw out their names....maybe Gordon, as well.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.
User avatar
mizzoupacers
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,120
And1: 12
Joined: May 27, 2004

 

Post#6 » by mizzoupacers » Wed May 14, 2008 6:44 pm

At #3 I'd play Russian roulette and go with Mayo. IMO, there are three top-notch talents in this draft, and Mayo is the third of them. Maybe I am underestimating Bayless, but I think that Mayo clearly has more talent and has a much better chance of becoming an NBA superstar.

If he doesn't turn out to be a complete headcase.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#7 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed May 14, 2008 6:54 pm

count55 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I added the "Other" option...now, I'm about to pick it...If we're in third, I'd put it on the market, looking for hopefully a pick later in the top-10 or 15 plus a player, or a veteran player.

If I couldn't find a deal to my liking, I'd probably put Bayless and Mayo (ugh) in a hat and draw out their names....maybe Gordon, as well.


Thanks for putting the other option.

But by draft board I mean if everyone was available who would we take. It has nothing to do with us picking 3rd. Otherwise we would go fro 1-3 then 11, then thats it.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#8 » by FreeRon » Wed May 14, 2008 8:24 pm

Gordon's not a true point and turns the ball over too much, and Mayo would only be worth the risk to us if he realized his fullest potential. Too many problems in the past with his type, so people would be out for Bird's head if he failed. There are too many low risk/high reward players out there to go with an inevitable risk/high reward player IMO.
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

 

Post#9 » by a-rod » Wed May 14, 2008 9:39 pm

FreeRon wrote:Gordon's not a true point and turns the ball over too much, and Mayo would only be worth the risk to us if he realized his fullest potential. Too many problems in the past with his type, so people would be out for Bird's head if he failed. There are too many low risk/high reward players out there to go with an inevitable risk/high reward player IMO.

Agreed, my vote goes to O.J. Mayo....
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
User avatar
JarrettJackSG
Rookie
Posts: 1,190
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 01, 2007

 

Post#10 » by JarrettJackSG » Wed May 14, 2008 9:42 pm

Shocking or not, I acutally have beasly as a 4 for our team, and have it being rose/bayless/mayo for us, based on need.

Mayo fits us so well.
Rest in Peace, Pacerfan
Will eat crow if Brandon Rush turns out good.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#11 » by cdash » Wed May 14, 2008 9:47 pm

mizzoupacers wrote:At #3 I'd play Russian roulette and go with Mayo. IMO, there are three top-notch talents in this draft, and Mayo is the third of them. Maybe I am underestimating Bayless, but I think that Mayo clearly has more talent and has a much better chance of becoming an NBA superstar.

If he doesn't turn out to be a complete headcase.


I second this post.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#12 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed May 14, 2008 9:51 pm

Nice to see we got a little competition with this one. Keep posting, now that we have a close race I'll keep this one going longer.
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

 

Post#13 » by Grang33r » Wed May 14, 2008 10:08 pm

Out of those, i selected Anthony Randolph. The kid is an amazing athlete. Reminds me alot of Chris Bosh. I think he may even be slightly better then Bosh from all i have read experts say. Randolph is a game changer, like an Amare i believe. A player we can build our franchise around with. I think he may be the sleeper of this draft...
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
User avatar
bravesatl
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

 

Post#14 » by bravesatl » Wed May 14, 2008 11:22 pm

staying as far away from mayo as we possibly can would be a very good thing for this franchise....

i picked bayless....
Image
RIP Coach Hep
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#15 » by FreeRon » Thu May 15, 2008 12:29 am

On a side note, who else thinks it's funny that the mock draft has us taking two shooting guards named Gordon? Anybody wanna bet me on this one? We MAY take Gordon at #11, but to add another SG in the second round would be kind of silly considering we have 18 players who can play there already. I assume we go for a big man somewhere in the draft unless we're planning on keeping JO and him staying healthy the entire year...
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#16 » by cdash » Thu May 15, 2008 3:15 am

That mock draft sucks. Why the hell would the Nets take Augustin when they just traded for Devin Harris? DeAndre Jordan is worth the gamble for them I feel like. Speights at 6 overall? Really? I mean...really? Those are just two of my many, many beefs with that mock.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#17 » by FreeRon » Thu May 15, 2008 3:28 am

To be honest with you I think they should take off the mock draft title and make it overall rankings. There would still be a few that I would disagree with, but it appears that whoever made the mock didn't factor in team needs.
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

 

Post#18 » by Grang33r » Thu May 15, 2008 4:45 am

I can't believe Ron Artest Jr is about to win this one. The kid has ALWAYS been in trouble, all his life. He goes to college and says he's going to be clean, so he picks #32 for his favorite athlete.... OJ SIMPSON, ok, the guy is only a murderer, but that's ok. To his credit, he does stay out of trouble, but now he's all over the press for taking money.

All these other athletes do it the right way, why can't he? I just don't understand. Is he that desperate to get the wealth that he just couldn't wait?

Mark my words guys, once Mayo makes the big buck in the NBA, he will be the next JR Rider. He won't have any clue how to handle the money.
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

 

Post#19 » by Grang33r » Thu May 15, 2008 4:51 am

FreeRon wrote:On a side note, who else thinks it's funny that the mock draft has us taking two shooting guards named Gordon? Anybody wanna bet me on this one? We MAY take Gordon at #11, but to add another SG in the second round would be kind of silly considering we have 18 players who can play there already. I assume we go for a big man somewhere in the draft unless we're planning on keeping JO and him staying healthy the entire year...


What mock draft?

DraftExpress- 11. Russell Westbrook, 41. Wayne Ellington
NBAdraft.net- 11. Kevin Lowe, 41. DeVon Hardin
RealGM- 11. Eric Gordon, 41. Bill Walker

What site do you go to for mocks?
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#20 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Thu May 15, 2008 4:57 am

Express has us getting Wayne Ellington? Wow that would be a HUGE steal in the second round. Don't know why we would take a combo guard and a shooting guard though.

Return to Indiana Pacers