Scoot McGroot wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I love lamp.
I just looooove to sell guns.
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
count55 wrote:I just looooove to sell guns.
MUpacersSIC wrote:I'm not really a big fan a Jordan. He just looks really raw right now. He may be a GOOD player down the road, but I just don't know if he'll ever end up a great player. (not really sure if that'f the best argument considering no one is really a sure thing, even Rose/Beasley)
On Kevin Love though, not sure that he is the best thing for the Pacers. I think he will be a good player in the league and his character seems top notch (plus he can make a full court shot) but the pacers need to draft a point guard. They've passed up on this in the draft the last few years and I think it's about time the Pacers organization makes a commitment to find their floor general. Westbrook or Augustin would both be my pick. I would prefer Augustin because to me he shows some major comparisons to Steve Nash. I'm not saying that's what he'll become, because we all know the Nash is top notch, but anyone who could possibly have a little of Nash in them seems like a good pick to me.
(first post on here so don't bash me too bad)
Indy07 wrote:My main argument for Love lies in the fact that I feel he has little to no bust factor. I think the worst case scenario for Love is that he will be a serviceable 7-8th man. Best case scenario, in my mind, is 19-10-5. When i compare the best case scenario to Augustin's, it just seems more apparent that Love has to be the pick (if available) solely based on BPA. Good players can assimilate to the coach's offense. I know many don't believe that he is good for JOB's offense but then again the length of JOB's tenure is up in the air.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.