Image

Bird can land a stud at #11....

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

dwpacer
Rookie
Posts: 1,137
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 11, 2003

Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#1 » by dwpacer » Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:07 pm

Just a real intriguing thought....

Our interest in DJ Augustin could cause a top ten player to fall right to us at the #11 pick.

Here's the top five picks on most mock drafts....

Derrick Rose
Michael Beasley
OJ Mayo
Jerryd Bayless
Kevin Love

Sleeper: Brook Lopez

Lopez has only had workouts with Minnesota and Seattle which makes it intriguing if
he does not get selected in the top five.

Here's picks 6-10 on most mock drafts.....

Eric Gordon
Russell Westbrook
Joe Alexander
Brook Lopez
Danilo Gallinari

Sleeper: DJ Augustin

If Augustin gets selected before the Pacers pick, pretty good odds are one of these guys drops right to the Pacers, any one of these guys could definately help the Pacers.

Pacers are also looking at Koufos and Randolph around that pick as well, but one of the picks they could acquire in trade is Portland's pick at #13.

Any thoughts???
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#2 » by Miller4ever » Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:24 pm

It would be nice, wouldn't it?

Our history at the #11 pick has thus far been amazing.
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#3 » by Bucky O'Hare » Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:23 pm

There will be studs available at #11, there always are. Let's just hope our scouts can separate the studs from the duds. I think we've done solid in the past few drafts, outside of James White.
User avatar
bravesatl
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#4 » by bravesatl » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:12 am

i've said it before, i'll say it now, and i'll keep sayin it.....DJ Augustin has stud written all over him
Image
RIP Coach Hep
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#5 » by Grang33r » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:17 am

I can't believe how torn everybody on this forum is on picks. I have a feeling this forum is going to be a massive war zone on draft night. lol

Seems like everyone likes somebody else and hates most of the rest of the class. haha
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#6 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:27 am

bravesatl wrote:i've said it before, i'll say it now, and i'll keep sayin it.....DJ Augustin has stud written all over him


Stud written all over him? He didn't do good against one decent college PG.

UCLA - 8/15, good shooting game, but he had 4 assists and 6 turnovers.
Kansas - 1/13, this game he actually made Tinsley look like a good shooter.
Kansas - 7/18, not an awful game considering his assists to turnover ration, but still.
Miami - 4/14, for those of you who don't know yet - Jack McClinton.
Memphis - 4/18, not only did he not shoot it well, he had more turnovers than assists.

I fail to see how he has "stud written all over him" when he hasn't even shown he can play against NBA level guards. I'm very happy to know we may draft a guy who can put up 30 points on Patrick Mills, I just have a feeling we won't be seeing a guy like Patrick Mills in the NBA.

Unless there is a PG I am missing, the only 5 games he played against NBA level guards, he struggled.
joew8302
Senior
Posts: 646
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 06, 2008

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#7 » by joew8302 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:33 am

I think Augustine will struggle as a pro period. I mean there are not a lot of 5'10 170 lb guys that excel in the pro game. Jameer Nelson was stronger, and quicker than Augustine in college. He also was a much better player, and he has turned out to be something not so special in the NBA game. If he can't excel I don't see how Augustine will.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#8 » by FreeRon » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:35 am

I've heard over and over about how he didn't play well against any NBA-calibre guards. To be honest, I'm not sold on him either. I'm somewhere in between. While it's true that he didn't play well against good guards, with NBA coaching that could change. He's shown that he can play, though, and I'm not too concerned with shooting from a PG anyways. One thing to always remember is you can't coach speed or natural talent, and he has both. You can't teach size either, though, and that's the biggest thing that concerns me right now.
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#9 » by Grang33r » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:38 am

^^ i couldn't agree more with both of you guys. The more i read about Augustin and see him on videos, the less interested i am. Each time somebody brings up "prove" to not select him i wonder why we are even considering him at #11. I'm not sold at all on him. Honestly, i'd be pretty disappointed if we selected Augustin. I don't think he will have a bright future in the pros and we'll be in the same no-PG problem just a few years down the road.

I hope Bird realizes that he is doing before it's too late.
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
User avatar
LEIF
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,606
And1: 921
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Charleston, SC. Born and raised in The City of North Miami.
Contact:
       

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#10 » by LEIF » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:00 am

could Gordon fall to Indy?

1. CHI - Rose
2. MIA - Beasley
3. MIN - Brook Lopez
4. SEA - Jerryd Bayless
5. MEM - Kevin Love
6. NYK - OJ Mayo
7. LAC - Russell Westbrook
8. MIL - Joe Alexander
9. CHA - Anthony Randolph
10. NJN - Danillo Gallinari
11. IND - ERIC GORDON

what is the least plausible selection from that 11?, they make alot of sense IMO.
Image

Follow me on Twitter @Lefty_Leif
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#11 » by Grang33r » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:03 am

^^ dude come on, don't tease us like that.... haha
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#12 » by Bucky O'Hare » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:18 am

WheywethWordz wrote:could Gordon fall to Indy?

1. CHI - Rose
2. MIA - Beasley
3. MIN - Brook Lopez
4. SEA - Jerryd Bayless
5. MEM - Kevin Love
6. NYK - OJ Mayo
7. LAC - Russell Westbrook
8. MIL - Joe Alexander
9. CHA - Anthony Randolph
10. NJN - Danillo Gallinari
11. IND - ERIC GORDON

what is the least plausible selection from that 11?, they make alot of sense IMO.


Looks very plausible to me, except I'd switch around Mayo and Lopez.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#13 » by PR07 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:55 am

The Pacers can land a stud at #11, but apparently it won't be Russell Westbrook. Not a huge surprise, but it means someone should fall to us.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#14 » by FreeRon » Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:02 pm

I know there's a lot more hype around Alexander and Randolph, but I can't see anyone taking them over Gordon. Also, Gallinari is falling and I couldn't see a lot of teams taking him over Gordon in the first place. If the top 9 go that way, though, I suppose it is possible that NJ takes Gallinari just because they already have Vince and have reportedly been trying to move Jefferson. It's also possible, though, that they take Gordon and move Vince to SF.
User avatar
bravesatl
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#15 » by bravesatl » Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:43 pm

joew8302 wrote:I think Augustine will struggle as a pro period. I mean there are not a lot of 5'10 170 lb guys that excel in the pro game. Jameer Nelson was stronger, and quicker than Augustine in college. He also was a much better player, and he has turned out to be something not so special in the NBA game. If he can't excel I don't see how Augustine will.


everything u said there from his height & weight to the jameer nelson comparison, completely false :roll:....

i'm tired of hearing everybody dogging him because of his size (6' 180 lbs), thats totally ridiculous....so i guess the following list of players similar to dj's size were supposed to struggle as well, and most of these guys if not all put on weight after coming into the NBA:

bob cousy 6'1" 175
isiah thomas 6'1" 182
mark jackson 6'1" 190
john stockton 6'1" 175
allen iverson 6' 165
steve nash 6'3" 178
chris paul 6' 175
tony parker 6'2" 180
mike bibby 6'2" 190
jason terry 6'2" 180
monta ellis 6'3" 177
tj ford 6' 165
derek fisher 6'1" 205
rajon rondo 6'1" 175
could go on and on....

i'm not comparing the players here, cuz obviously comparing augustin to cousy would be way off, i'm comparing the sizes which a lot of people are obsessed about....
Image

RIP Coach Hep
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,952
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#16 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:54 pm

Augustin measured out at 5'10" without shoes, 5'11.5" with shoes on, and 172 pounds. His 6'3.5" wingspan also measured below average for the draft-able candidates at PG in this draft. His wingspan only beats Ty Lawson and equals Jerryd Bayless', but is dwarfed by all the other PG candidates in this draft.
User avatar
bravesatl
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#17 » by bravesatl » Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:56 pm

DGrangeRx33 wrote:Stud written all over him? He didn't do good against one decent college PG.

UCLA - 8/15, good shooting game, but he had 4 assists and 6 turnovers.
Kansas - 1/13, this game he actually made Tinsley look like a good shooter.
Kansas - 7/18, not an awful game considering his assists to turnover ration, but still.
Miami - 4/14, for those of you who don't know yet - Jack McClinton.
Memphis - 4/18, not only did he not shoot it well, he had more turnovers than assists.

I fail to see how he has "stud written all over him" when he hasn't even shown he can play against NBA level guards. I'm very happy to know we may draft a guy who can put up 30 points on Patrick Mills, I just have a feeling we won't be seeing a guy like Patrick Mills in the NBA.

Unless there is a PG I am missing, the only 5 games he played against NBA level guards, he struggled.


so u dont think he'll be great because of 5 games in college, thats weak IMO, i fail to see that logic....

sabastian telfair and monta ellis didnt even play in college and they seem to be doing just fine, telfair averaged 9 pts 6 asst in his 3rd season, ellis 20 pts 5 rebs 4 assts in his 3rd season....

steve nash played at big ole santa clara, did he face NBA ready PGs there? probably not any....jason kidd played at california, i'll guess he played only a handfull....nash didn't average over 6.4 assists in his college career....

dj augustin = poor man's steve nash = very good

am i the only dj augustin fan here?
Image

RIP Coach Hep
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,952
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#18 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:01 pm

bravesatl wrote:
DGrangeRx33 wrote:Stud written all over him? He didn't do good against one decent college PG.

UCLA - 8/15, good shooting game, but he had 4 assists and 6 turnovers.
Kansas - 1/13, this game he actually made Tinsley look like a good shooter.
Kansas - 7/18, not an awful game considering his assists to turnover ration, but still.
Miami - 4/14, for those of you who don't know yet - Jack McClinton.
Memphis - 4/18, not only did he not shoot it well, he had more turnovers than assists.

I fail to see how he has "stud written all over him" when he hasn't even shown he can play against NBA level guards. I'm very happy to know we may draft a guy who can put up 30 points on Patrick Mills, I just have a feeling we won't be seeing a guy like Patrick Mills in the NBA.

Unless there is a PG I am missing, the only 5 games he played against NBA level guards, he struggled.


so u dont think he'll be great because of 5 games in college, thats weak IMO, i fail to see that logic....

sabastian telfair and monta ellis didnt even play in college and they seem to be doing just fine, telfair averaged 9 pts 6 asst in his 3rd season, ellis 20 pts 5 rebs 4 assts in his 3rd season....

steve nash played at big ole santa clara, did he face NBA ready PGs there? probably not any....jason kidd played at california, i'll guess he played only a handfull....

dj augustin = poor man's steve nash = very good

am i the only dj augustin fan here?


I'm ok with Augustin, but I'm trying not to be a huge fan of too many prospects. I think I've become smitten with Russell Westbrook.


However, I do have to disagree with your argument. The original argument was that Augustin matched up poorly in any games where he played against an NBA caliber PG. The fact that Telfair or Monta Ellis didn't play in college doesn't even relate. Basically, the belief is that Augustin dominated lesser competition and was exposed by NBA level talent. Telfair and Ellis didn't play NBA talent in high school, but neither were they exposed by said talent. They were both inflated in playing against lesser talent, and it just turned out that Ellis is a very good pro, whereas Telfair has shown he can compete. We just don't know that about Augustin right now, and it's a very viable fact that we need to keep ourselves aware of.


I don't see how Augustin should automatically receive "poor-man's Steve Nash" level yet. Nash was very average for the early part of his career, turned into an above average PG for many years, and then didn't become elite PG until many years after he was drafted, and at least two changed cities.
User avatar
bravesatl
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#19 » by bravesatl » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:02 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:Augustin measured out at 5'10" without shoes, 5'11.5" with shoes on, and 172 pounds. His 6'3.5" wingspan also measured below average for the draft-able candidates at PG in this draft. His wingspan only beats Ty Lawson and equals Jerryd Bayless', but is dwarfed by all the other PG candidates in this draft.


well the site i looked at was mistaken then, but please explain to me why that matters, especially with the skills augustin has....
Image

RIP Coach Hep
joew8302
Senior
Posts: 646
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 06, 2008

Re: Bird can land a stud at #11.... 

Post#20 » by joew8302 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:04 pm

bravesatl wrote:
joew8302 wrote:I think Augustine will struggle as a pro period. I mean there are not a lot of 5'10 170 lb guys that excel in the pro game. Jameer Nelson was stronger, and quicker than Augustine in college. He also was a much better player, and he has turned out to be something not so special in the NBA game. If he can't excel I don't see how Augustine will.


everything u said there from his height & weight to the jameer nelson comparison, completely false :roll:....

i'm tired of hearing everybody dogging him because of his size (6' 180 lbs), thats totally ridiculous....so i guess the following list of players similar to dj's size were supposed to struggle as well, and most of these guys if not all put on weight after coming into the NBA:

bob cousy 6'1" 175
isiah thomas 6'1" 182
mark jackson 6'1" 190
john stockton 6'1" 175
allen iverson 6' 165
steve nash 6'3" 178
chris paul 6' 175
tony parker 6'2" 180
mike bibby 6'2" 190
jason terry 6'2" 180
monta ellis 6'3" 177
tj ford 6' 165
derek fisher 6'1" 205
rajon rondo 6'1" 175
could go on and on....

i'm not comparing the players here, cuz obviously comparing augustin to cousy would be way off, i'm comparing the sizes which a lot of people are obsessed about....



Ok, are you talking about the exceptions to the rule now, or the rule itself. If I wanted to I could come up with a list 5 times as long as that filled with guys his size that didn't pan out. And I mean look at some of these guys you are comparing him to. T.J. Ford? You really want him on your team? Rajon Rondo? I look at Augustine and he is not overly quick or strong and he won't be able to help us out a whole heck of a lot on defense. He can shoot, but we already have a PG with similar in Diener. I just don't think Augustine is worth the 11th pick.

Return to Indiana Pacers