IND-Sonics or MIA-INDY- SONICs

n_s_s31 · Post #1 » by **n_s_s31** » Wed Jul 2, 2008 5:15 pm

I posted these in the trade checker thread and they havent recieved any comments so i figured i would post them in their own thread (if thats not allowed then feel free to lock or delete)

Indy incoming
Wilcox
Adrian Griffin

Sonics Incoming
Daniels
Williams

We get an athletic PF that we need, and Sonics get two players that can play multiple positions. Williams could be a Sixth man backing up both Durant and Green. They could move Green into the starting lineup at PF without taking Durant out of his natural position(SF). And Daniels is servicable at PG, SG, or Sf

Second idea
Indy Gets
Wilcox

Seattle Gets
Haslem

MIA
Tinsley
maybe a future second rounder (or a top 10 protected first to entice them to take JT)

Pacers again get the Athletic banger they need
FOrd- Jack
Dunleavy-RUsh
Granger- Williams
Wilcox-Murphy- Foster
Rasho- Foster- hibbert

Sonics gets a guy that is a great leader (apparently voted captain of Miami) and he can mentor the young team.
Westbrook-Ridnour
Wilkins-Griffin
Durant- Green
Haslem- Green
Collison-Petro-Swift

MIA gets a PG that would fit right alongside D-Wade and distribute the ball better than most PGs that are available (8.4 apg) he would be able to get the ball to wade and beasley and marion consistently and Riley has a tendency to take on other teams problems

Tinsley-Williams(if resigned)- quinn
Wade-Cook
Marion-Davis-Wright
Beasley-Marion
Mourning-Blount

Post #2 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Wed Jul 2, 2008 6:22 pm

I can't see Miami taking Tinsley back for Udonis Haslem in any way, shape, or form.

FreeRon · Post #3 » by **FreeRon** » Wed Jul 2, 2008 8:11 pm

i don't like the idea of sending out a first round pick to get rid of Tinsley unless it's at least lottery protected for the next 10 years. I'm still a little sore about the Harrington trade when we gave up the 11th pick in a year that it was top-10 protected.

joew8302 · Post #4 » by **joew8302** » Wed Jul 2, 2008 11:22 pm

I don't particularly like either deal. They both seem like lateral moves to me. In the Seattle deal we get older and the Miami deal we get Wilcox, which is nothing to get excited about.

Post #5 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Thu Jul 3, 2008 7:16 pm

Wilcox and Haslem are both very exciting, especially if we're sending out Daniels or Tinsley in the deal. If we're sending out Shawne williams, it gets a little less exciting, though, I will admit.

HicksvsKnicks08 · Post #6 » by **HicksvsKnicks08** » Thu Jul 3, 2008 9:23 pm

Indy incoming
Wilcox
Adrian Griffin

Sonics Incoming
Daniels
Williams

actually thats not bad. Except I would be worried about giving up Daniels expiring contract.

Post #7 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Thu Jul 3, 2008 9:29 pm

HicksvsKnicks08 wrote:Indy incoming
Wilcox
Adrian Griffin

Sonics Incoming
Daniels
Williams

actually thats not bad. Except I would be worried about giving up Daniels expiring contract.

Wilcox is expiring as well.

fdefore · Post #8 » by **fdefore** » Thu Jul 3, 2008 9:41 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:I can't see Miami taking Tinsley back for Udonis Haslem in any way, shape, or form.

I could...

... if Kevin Pritchard was the Pacers' GM...

... and Kevin McHale rocked the Heat's front office