Page 1 of 1

IND/LAL

Posted: Fri Jul 4, 2008 8:55 pm
by IndyDave02
Could the Lakers still be interested in moving Odom this year. He is in the last year of his contract so if it doesn't work, we would have a lot more cap room. Here is my suggestion:

OUTGOING:

TINSLEY
DUNLEAVY

INCOMING:

ODOM
KARL

The Lakers would have a cast around Kobe and a line up that would look like this:

C- Gasol
PF- Bynum
SF- Dunleavy
SG- Kobe
PG- Tinsley

The Pacers could have Odom as a starting PF:

C- Murphy/Nesterovich/Hibbert
PF- Odom/Foster/Baston
SF- Granger/Williams/Graham
SG- Rush/ Daniels/Karl
PG- TJ Ford/Jack/Denier

I know some will blast losing Dunleavy but the Lakers aren't giving Odom (and his expiring contract) away for nothing. Rush would be able to develop sooner or we move Williams/Daniels into the starting lineup. More importantly, this is a move for next year when Odom and Nesterovich's salary drops off.

Thoughts?


GO PACERS!

Re: IND/LAL

Posted: Fri Jul 4, 2008 8:59 pm
by Bucky O'Hare
I don't think it's totally unrealistic. With Gasol and a healthy Bynum, I do think Dunleavy is a better fit for the Lakers than Odom. Still, the Lakers have a good shooter and defender in Fisher locked up long-term, and have Farmar to groom as his eventual replacement, so I doubt they'd have much interest in adding Tinsley's salary.

Odom + Walton for Dunleavy + Quis is probably more realistic.

Re: IND/LAL

Posted: Sat Jul 5, 2008 3:09 am
by joew8302
No way, Odom didn't seem at al happy at the prospect of being a Pacer when the JO rumors were going on. No point in having guys here who dont wanna be part of the team.

Re: IND/LAL

Posted: Sat Jul 5, 2008 7:35 am
by CableKC
Dunleavy isn't the type of SF that they are looking for. They want a SF that can defend. Also...it's been mentioned before that Tinsley is not a good fit for the Triangle Offense.

Re: IND/LAL

Posted: Sun Jul 6, 2008 4:11 am
by APerna
I'll take that deal, and a side of herpes.

Re: IND/LAL

Posted: Sun Jul 6, 2008 6:56 am
by That Nicka
:rofl: