Page 1 of 1
IND-MIL
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:20 pm
by greenway84
TINSLEY to MIL
SHAWNE to MIL
2ND to MIL
------------
RIDNOUR to MIA
ELSON to MIA
------------
HASLEM to IND
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 6:37 pm
by bballpacen
We do have a trade proposal thread... Pretty sure that this should go there, instead of a separate thread of its own...
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:26 pm
by greenway84
nope its the offseason its fine right here. that is unless you have a ton other threads you need to post. its been dead around here just trying to stir up some talk. maybe you like seeing the same 3 threads everyday. i dont. so until you become a mod why dont you back up. thanks
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:03 pm
by xxSnEaKyPxx
Calm down greenway, wow.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:55 pm
by HicksvsKnicks08
Check'em Greenway ! lol
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:21 am
by Gremz
Wow, this thread just got interesting. We're supposed to be igniting the passion guys, not each other.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:53 pm
by Scoot McGroot
Calm down guys. Not worth it.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:53 pm
by MillerTime101
Why would Milwaukee trade a guy that they just traded for? I dont know if your aware that Scott Skilles is now the coach in Milwaukee, he is pretty much the last guy in the league that would want Tinsley.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:02 pm
by greenway84
We just traded for rasho, baston, mcbob. and yet you see plenty of trade rumors, ideas about those guys. all i kept hearing around our board that we were probably just waiting till sept so we could include one of the players we traded for with tinsley. so is that not the same thing.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:03 pm
by APerna
Yeah, I don't see this happening even though it's a decent match under the CBA.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:36 pm
by Boneman2
Charlie V would do it for me.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:03 pm
by Oomph
The only player the Bucks might give up for Tinsley is Gadzuric but yeah the Bucks don“t really need Jamaal

Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:01 pm
by greenway84
Gadz for Tinsley Straight up? I'm in. Hell he has to be better than Baston and McRoberts, and he sure as hell is better than Tinsley sitting at home or us paying him to play somewhere else.(which i will despise) Not that I think we would.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:10 pm
by Scoot McGroot
He's definitely not better than Baston. Maybe McRoberts.
However, I'd gladly trade Tinsley straight up for Gadzuric.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:26 pm
by greenway84
Baston
PPG 2.7
RPG 1.7
APG 0.2
SPG 0.1
BPG 0.3
FG% 0.680
FT% 0.700
3P% 0.000
Gadzuric
PPG 3.2
RPG 2.8
APG 0.2
SPG 0.4
BPG 0.5
FG% 0.416
FT% 0.524
3P% 0.000
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:27 pm
by Scoot McGroot
Check the minutes per game. Gadzuric is barely a rotational player, if he even is one. Baston, you may have forgotten, is a useful player and is solid as a 2nd or 3rd big off the bench. Also, if you're just quoting stats, you're likely not going to get far with me. Stats don't tell the whole story.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:54 pm
by greenway84
oh i agree. you can run through my posts and thats honestly probably the 2nd maybe 1st time i qouted stats. but if you want to just argue each others opinion than my opinion is gadz is better. and baston is a rotational player at best. IMO. Gadz size and age alone is better than baston. then throw in stats and gadz look better on paper too.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:24 pm
by Scoot McGroot
But the stats actually show Baston as the better player. Factor in the amount of minutes play, and Baston actually produces more on a per-minute basis.
Gadzuric is only 18 months younger, and about an inch and a half taller. I simply see Baston as a better player on a better contract. I think if we traded Tinsley for Gadzuric, that we'd then let Gadzuric battle Hibbert for the 3rd center minutes while we use Rasho as trade bait to get a different player.
Re: IND-MIL
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:12 am
by MillerTime101
greenway84 wrote:We just traded for rasho, baston, mcbob. and yet you see plenty of trade rumors, ideas about those guys. all i kept hearing around our board that we were probably just waiting till sept so we could include one of the players we traded for with tinsley. so is that not the same thing.
There is a big difference though, those players were more filler in the deal, the main reasons we did the deal was for TJ Ford and the draft pick. Milwaukee did that deal to get Ridnour and Ridnour alone there is no way they would ship him out at this point in time.