Page 1 of 1
Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:14 pm
by Miller4ever
Congrats to Dunthreevy for having faith in the Pacers.
Next, up, the Sacramento Kings, who we haven't played yet, and who suck worse than we do in many ways. Hopefully we'll be able to use the momentum from the last game to really dominate in an away game, because a road win is overdue and necessary.
Pacers by 5.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:22 pm
by Granger da OG
What the heck, Pacers +25, yeah i said it +25
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 8:36 pm
by cdash
Pacers by 4.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 8:39 pm
by Kuq_e_Zi91
We played the Kings in January. Kevin Martin was only a couple games back from an injury and he still dropped 45 on us. Danny had 35 of his own and we came out with the win.
We really need this game. Hopefully we're still riding high after that win vs Denver.
Pacers +15
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:21 pm
by APerna
Indy by +10
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:51 pm
by chatard5
Wow, I didn't know the Kings were 13-48... But we are 7-25 on the road, which is bad, too. Pacers +3
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:57 pm
by chatard5
M4E, in the Tracking Thread it still says a minimum of 10 games, but I think you wanted to change it to 20 or something. If I win I am definitely getting the song, and you better not rhyme chatard with (Please Use More Appropriate Word).
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 12:01 am
by Miller4ever
It is 20. I'm even considering 25, but that's bad to change the rules that much. People are going to start getting disqualified because they don't have enough games.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:14 am
by khensley308
Pacers by 8
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:21 am
by Dunthreevy
Pacers +8
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 4:13 pm
by RikSmits1
Pacers +15
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:37 pm
by JarrettJackSG
It's a game we should win.
Kings by 4
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 7:17 pm
by Miller4ever
Nice, JJSG. Glad to see you playing our petty little games again. You're just in time to continue just when I removed you from the standings because you hadn't posted here in a month...
How do you feel about starting over?
EDIT*: I just remembered that when I took you out, you were in the bottom half. Sstarting over's a good idea.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 7:38 pm
by cdash
You know, he's probably right. It's a game we should win, so we probably won't.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 9:42 pm
by pacersrule08
Pacers by 9
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:05 pm
by xxSnEaKyPxx
Kings by 5...I was originally going to put 4, but JJSG took it. 0_0
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:47 pm
by Miller4ever
I'ma repeat myself again: doesn't matter who came first, because it all averages out in the end, unless you continuously guess the exact same as somebody else (unlikely).
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:56 pm
by xxSnEaKyPxx
Meh...I'll stick with 5 anyway.
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Wed Mar 4, 2009 12:44 am
by bballpacen
Pacers +11
Re: Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09
Posted: Wed Mar 4, 2009 1:32 am
by JarrettJackSG
Miller4ever wrote:Nice, JJSG. Glad to see you playing our petty little games again. You're just in time to continue just when I removed you from the standings because you hadn't posted here in a month...
How do you feel about starting over?
EDIT*: I just remembered that when I took you out, you were in the bottom half. Sstarting over's a good idea.
haha i don't mind..i think a month's break was fair don't you? given all the tension we had? all is well now.