Image

Vancouver?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
Crossova21
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 11
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Vancouver? 

Post#1 » by Crossova21 » Tue May 12, 2009 10:12 pm

Rumors are starting to spread that Francesco Aquilini, owner of the NHL’s Vancouver Canucks, is reportedly expressing interest in purchasing the Indiana Pacers and moving the team to Vancouver, B.C. (Bleacher Report). Pacers co-owner Herb Simon are working as hard as they can to work out a new arena deal with the Indianapolis Capital Improvement Board and says he doesn’t want to see Indy without an NBA team.

http://www.howeypolitics.com/2009/05/12/may-12-2009-hpi-daily-wire/

Is there any truth to this story? I would really hate to see it happen and would imagine that Indiana would sell the Fever before we moved the Pacers
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#2 » by PR07 » Tue May 12, 2009 10:33 pm

Can't really see the NBA giving Vancouver another team when there are more attractive destinations, and this is IF the Pacers can't resolve their issues with the city, which I think they will.
chatard5
Analyst
Posts: 3,187
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#3 » by chatard5 » Tue May 12, 2009 11:57 pm

We just need to add a good casino downtown. It's win-win! I think we will find a resolution before the Pacers were to be sold.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,757
And1: 14,016
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#4 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed May 13, 2009 4:57 am

The Pacers already worked out their contract with the CIB and are legally obligated to be tenants in Conseco Fieldhouse for something like another 15 years or so.


No truth to this report.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#5 » by Boneman2 » Wed May 13, 2009 5:03 am

scare tactics 101...
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
User avatar
freeman
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 1
Joined: May 16, 2007

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#6 » by freeman » Wed May 13, 2009 5:09 am

oh man, guess i'll re-consider migrating to Canada.
Image

F R E E M A N
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#7 » by Miller4ever » Wed May 13, 2009 5:20 am

I'd root for the Vancouver Pacers until Granger and Rush leave.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#8 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed May 13, 2009 7:24 am

Since I have no connections to Indiana, doesn't really matter where they play...I'll be a Pacers fan. I'd like to see them stay in Indiana, and theres less than a 1% chance that they move anyway, so its nothing to worry about.
User avatar
freeman
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 1
Joined: May 16, 2007

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#9 » by freeman » Wed May 13, 2009 9:59 am

DGrangeRx33 wrote:Since I have no connections to Indiana, doesn't really matter where they play...I'll be a Pacers fan. I'd like to see them stay in Indiana, and theres less than a 1% chance that they move anyway, so its nothing to worry about.


ditto.
Image

F R E E M A N
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#10 » by cdash » Wed May 13, 2009 12:34 pm

Stern said in a podcast with Bill Simmons that since the NBA was such a colossal failure in Vancouver the first time around that he can't see the NBA going back there in the foreseeable future. Go fish.
Image
raptorsam
Banned User
Posts: 1,854
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 07, 2006
Contact:

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#11 » by raptorsam » Wed May 13, 2009 5:16 pm

^^

Stern said it was the nba fault not the city or the fans. The grizzlies were one of the worst run teams in the history of sports. Terrible coaching, players and the worst GM ever to step foot in the nba, Stu Jackson. Vancouver supported its team fine, considering how bad they were. They drew way more people even in there last year than memphis ever has. Vancouver is a world class city of around 4 million, has tons of money, strong international influence, its just a matter of time i feel before they get a team back
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#12 » by PR07 » Wed May 13, 2009 5:56 pm

They had Mike Bibby, Shareef Abdur Rahim, and Big Country Reeves; so there was some talent there.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#13 » by cdash » Wed May 13, 2009 11:37 pm

raptorsam wrote:^^

Stern said it was the nba fault not the city or the fans. The grizzlies were one of the worst run teams in the history of sports. Terrible coaching, players and the worst GM ever to step foot in the nba, Stu Jackson. Vancouver supported its team fine, considering how bad they were. They drew way more people even in there last year than memphis ever has. Vancouver is a world class city of around 4 million, has tons of money, strong international influence, its just a matter of time i feel before they get a team back


It will be a long, long time before the NBA goes back to Vancouver. I'm not arguing it's not a world-class city (by all accounts, it is), I'm just saying the NBA didn't fare so well there.
Image
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,757
And1: 14,016
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#14 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu May 14, 2009 1:10 am

You'd have to think that there would be a lot of other cities that would get a shot with a franchise before Vancouver would get a 2nd shot.

St. Louis and a 2nd go round in Seattle immediately come to mind. Even Las Vegas.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#15 » by cdash » Thu May 14, 2009 1:14 am

Off the top of my head: St. Louis, Seattle, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Anaheim, San Jose, Tampa, and San Diego would all get a look before Vancouver would. Just my opinion.
Image
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#16 » by Boneman2 » Thu May 14, 2009 4:18 am

conseco is any owners dream, especially considering it's in the most basketball crazed state on this planet. anyone who questions if this state can support a pro franchise only needs to go back to pre-brawl support. yeah, stern is right the nba screwed up when they villified our superior team. anyone who could care less if this team isn't in indy is only a fan of players, like my cousin who roots for a different nfl team every few years because he likes T.O. what a joke, and a poor excuse for a fan.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
chatard5
Analyst
Posts: 3,187
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#17 » by chatard5 » Thu May 14, 2009 4:36 am

Woo, St. Louis! I don't think they would really embrace a basketball team, to be honest. It is a big city and they could get fans. They love the Cardinals and then the Blues. They liked the Rams, but only cause they won a super bowl, at least from what I have seen.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#18 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Thu May 14, 2009 4:43 am

Boneman2 wrote:conseco is any owners dream, especially considering it's in the most basketball crazed state on this planet. anyone who questions if this state can support a pro franchise only needs to go back to pre-brawl support. yeah, stern is right the nba screwed up when they villified our superior team. anyone who could care less if this team isn't in indy is only a fan of players, like my cousin who roots for a different nfl team every few years because he likes T.O. what a joke, and a poor excuse for a fan.

I don't know about that, NC may be the most basketball crazed state. UNC/Duke is considered by many to be a bigger rivalry than Yankees/Red Sox.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#19 » by Miller4ever » Thu May 14, 2009 5:54 am

Indiana has IU, at the very least. The basketball culture is more deeply ingrained, though I would say the basketball culture is close. The whole state of Indiana is basketball-crazy, whereas NC definitely centers around Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill.
chatard5
Analyst
Posts: 3,187
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: Vancouver? 

Post#20 » by chatard5 » Thu May 14, 2009 6:10 am

UNC vs. Duke is different. It's a great rivalry, but just because 2 schools are both very good at basketball and are close and hate each other doesn't make the state bigger than Indiana. Do you think the biggest baseball state is New York? Although they have had mannnnyyyy HOFers from the Yanks (and Mets), it doesn't mean they're a baseball town.

Heck, Indiana probably has 10 high school gyms that are bigger than Dukes. We start young here.

Return to Indiana Pacers