RealGM

Theres an ESPN Insider article titled No takers for Tinsley. If anyone could let us know whats up with it i would appreciate it

Link:
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors?&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnba%2ffeatures%2frumors

Nothing really that we didn't already know...

"No Takers for Tinsley
Jamaal Tinsley
The Indianapolis Star reports the Pacers would like to trade Jamaal Tinsley, but they can't find a deal.

"Every day we talk about it, we contact teams," Larry Bird said. "We're always putting feelers out there to see if we can get anything done."

thanks, but booooooo

I feel bad for the guy. Remember the good ole days...

...the turnovers...

...lack of interest in the games...

...disgustingly awful decisions...

I take that back. SWEEP HIS LEG

artichokes wrote:I feel bad for the guy. Remember the good ole days...

...the turnovers...

...lack of interest in the games...

...disgustingly awful decisions...

I take that back. SWEEP HIS LEG

Hit him with a MEAN leg sweep! I like it!

After a year off, I'm ready for us to start playing him to increase his value enough to trade him. what would it hurt, we aren't winning the championship anyway, and if we trade TJ we'll need another Point Guard to play early.

It's been a good break, let's play him. He's really skilled

What the **** were the pacers expecting when you let a guy sit out an entire year? They should of traded him last summer or just bought him out.

We should have traded him to the bobcats for Nazr Mohammad or the Bucks for Gadz as rotten as those deals are it's better than having a guy sitting at home taking up a roster spot and costing us $7 million.

Tinsley is going to sit for another year then next off-season will be a good expiring for S&T

IndieRuso420 wrote:Tinsley is going to sit for another year then next off-season will be a good expiring for S&T

I get the feeling this will happen too.

i could see us buy him out if we sign Jack back and draft a PG