RealGM

February 17th, you type in Troy Murphy and you get quite a few bucks articles, some of it fan chatter, but some of it turning serious.

Some articles in question:

http://www.fanfeedr.com/nba/2010/02/17/ ... ays-this-m

http://milwaukee-bucks.nbaannouncer.com ... um=twitter

http://www.yardbarker.com/nba/article_e ... um=twitter

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/b ... rade.blog/

good find. To tell you the truth i wouldnt mind doing Thomas, Ridnour, Ilyasova and Bell for Murphy and Rush but it doesnt work on trade checker. Maybe instead of rush we could put dunleavy. and you never know we could get their first also

Murphy is playing tonight against the Spurs.
This reduces the likelihood of any trade happening

no not really^^^^

glasket wrote:Murphy is playing tonight against the Spurs.
This reduces the likelihood of any trade happening

Only if Murphy's playing time is reduced in the 2nd half by a significant margin.

tyrus thomas is playing for the bulls and he is prob going to get traded

according to bucks fans they just got salmons gor elson and kurt thomas which leaves them a big hole at pf. is troy the next to milwakee?

^^

Only if we include Travis and Luther for Luke, Charlie and Hakim or Joe. Keeps the money about square and doesn't force anyone to cut players to make room.

Why not get the T-Mac Deal. Ford, Murphy,Dunleavy for T-Mac, Carl Landry and Brian Cook. Can dump 29M next year.

As far as Milwaukee; Not much to manuver with, may Luke and Warrick for Murphy and McRoberts. Gets us 9.5M expiring next year and a young inside PF. Only shoots 17% 3PT, ouch for O'Briens open system.

Okay buck fan here, I don't see the bucks trading Ersan just to get rid of bell, but here's an idea

Well the links not loading on my comp, so i'll give it a run through

Bucks out-Warrick,Alexander,Ridnour,Elson,bell and second
Bucks in-Pargo, Salmons, and Murphy

Chi out-Pargo and Salmons
Chi in-Warrick, Alexander, Elson

Indi in-Ridnour and Banks, 2 seconds
Indi out-Murphy

Tor in Bell
Tor out-Banks

Ind gets a lot of cap space and holds a small expiring for next year at 4 mil a year. You could also attempt to flip Ridnour for something if you choose.

Banks? 2nds? Yeah, we get the cap relief, but in this case, I'd rather keep Murphy. He is our starter.

Ford, Diener, Price, Ridnour, Banks....am I missing anyone? Too many PG's, 2 worthless picks, and not nearly what we could get for him as a huge expiring deal next year.

Miller4ever wrote:Banks? 2nds? Yeah, we get the cap relief, but in this case, I'd rather keep Murphy. He is our starter.

So if we could find a place for bell, would you take any type of 010 salary. maybe 2-3 million?

blueandgold wrote:Why not get the T-Mac Deal. Ford, Murphy,Dunleavy for T-Mac, Carl Landry and Brian Cook. Can dump 29M next year.

As far as Milwaukee; Not much to manuver with, may Luke and Warrick for Murphy and McRoberts. Gets us 9.5M expiring next year and a young inside PF. Only shoots 17% 3PT, ouch for O'Briens open system.

The Rocks are getting much better offers for TMac and Cook. You never get Landry in a deal like that. They have no use for TJ. But at the last min if we offered them Murph and Dun for TMac they might bite on it. 2 reasons, 1. they need a big, and 2. they cut $3 million in salary this season which gets them under the Luxury tax level. That means $6 million plus the rebate about $10 million if I'm not mistaken. We have just enough room to eat $3 million in salary and stay under the Tax level of $69.92 million.