RealGM

Would anyone consider that?

Portis is much more injury prone than the current RBs the Giants currently have. Haynesworth, I don't think he is worth the money he is being paid. He is the best player at his position when healthy but the guy cant even give 16 games a season.

thatdude wrote:

^This.

no. Haynesworth has an awful contract and is not the type of player needed in the locker room. Portis isn't very enticing either.

Would be a stupid trade on our part....

Would be a stupid trade on the Redskins part too. Why would the Skins want Osi?

It would put us in the Superbowl. Haynesworth is still a dominant player while Osi is coming off the worst season of his career and at his age may never fully recover. Plus we already have Kiwi ready to step in and JPP in the pipeline. Fat Al would make our DL much better than Osi does even though he'll miss a few games a year. He wouldn't be a problem in our locker-room either because Washington would eat all of his guaranteed money so we could cut him at no cost at any time if he's too big of a problem. Haynesworth and Canty would be a a duo to rival the Williams wall and with Joseph and Alford we'd have tremendous depth. Our run D would go from our biggest concern to a dominant strength.

Portis is pretty useless to us so I wouldn't really want him but AH is a monster even at 85%. I general hate guys who are lazy and so under-achieve, but Fat Al is dominant even when he's being lazy. Plus we'd rotate him to keep him fresh, healthy and motivated. This trade would make our D elite to go with our very strong passing game.