Page 1 of 1

T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 5:11 am
by mugzi
I know all the baggage that comes w/ T.O. but the guy can fill Plax role and we can make an incentive based contract, if he acts up he's gone.

If it were my choice I would, but Id make it a 1yr deal heavily incentive based.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 5:40 am
by I_Love_NYK
NOOO for sooo many reasons.

1. We all know he is a locker room headache, and even though Coughlin is a disciplinarian I don't think even Coughlin can get him in check.

2. He is 35.

3. He has been dropping soo many passes the past couple of years. Easy ones.

4. Jeremy Shockey yelling at Eli messed Eli up.

Harrison, will find a team before TO. There will be a clause in his contract.

I don't want him. Bring in Kenny Britt or Darrius Heyward-Bey.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 5:41 am
by krustytheclown
noooooooooooo way joseeeeeeeeeee the guy is a loser and a selfish player

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 6:39 am
by mjhp911
Nay. Just draft a speedster on day one. If Plax's legal situation worsens, then use one of our defensive linemen to trade for Boldin or Edwards.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 12:29 pm
by Jitpal
I'd rather bring in Harrison or trade for Holt than put TO on this team. -Jitpal

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 2:57 pm
by I_Love_NYK
I would rather go after Torry Holt if they are gonna go after a veteran Receiver. He runs good routes and has good hands. Woulda had better numbers if St. Louis had a better offensive attack. But the WR in this Draft is very good, and that's why Reese passed up on TJ.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 5:09 pm
by mugzi
mjhp911 wrote:Nay. Just draft a speedster on day one. If Plax's legal situation worsens, then use one of our defensive linemen to trade for Boldin or Edwards.



Thats probably the best idea Ive seen on the receiver subject. Id rather have Boldin than Edwards, even though neither are as good as Plax imo.

To the guy that suggested Holt, he's 32 and lost a step, plus I dont think at this point he's anything more than a #2 or 3 receiver.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:51 pm
by VinnyTheMick
No way in hell.

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 7:21 am
by blueNorange
:laugh: :nonono: :blank:

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 7:40 am
by mjhp911
Chris Mortensen was reporting on ESPN that almost ALL the teams have said they weren't interested, in some form or another. All 'cept the Raydahs...

Re: T.O. Yes or No?

Posted: Mon Mar 9, 2009 5:35 am
by mjhp911
Wowzers, the Bills, way out in left field...