Harry Palmer wrote:In terms of our off-season, specifically Deebo, yeah he had regressed or was hurt so much it amounted to the same thing, and yeah he was the teacher’s pet who was held to a lower standard re: blocking and effort, and yeah, he was too easily locked up. All that is true and I have felt that way for quite a while.
BUT…
Opposing players/teams/coaches feared him, a lot. He was like having a wildcard, he could just go off and make good defense look incidental, when healthy. His usage confused teams, especially with CMC on the same field. We might not be much worse without him, but I think we are a lot more vanilla/standard too.
Sure. I don't want to diminish the impact of Deebo's loss. As said, he's a unique player, and with the ball in his hands and some room to run, he's still about as dangerous as they come. But he's not nearly what he used to be, and the consistency just wasn't there at all. For all the big plays, his poor play could also undermine drives. Given where Purdy excels (vision, anticipation, rhythm), I think some of the other receivers on the roster are a better fit. But we'll see. Unlikely any of them put up a season that can match Deebo's best.