ImageImageImageImageImage

Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach

Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82

Dodub
General Manager
Posts: 9,857
And1: 628
Joined: Aug 19, 2014
 

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#981 » by Dodub » Mon Feb 16, 2015 6:36 am

wco81 wrote:I'm guessing they requested Harbaugh to retain Tomsula as DL coach, rather than hire someone else that Harbaugh and his staff were familiar with.

Now if they had insisted that Harbaugh make Tomsula the DC 4 years ago, Harbaugh would have signed with Miami or someone else.

Makes you wonder what they'd have done with a more in-demand candidate like Quinn or Ryan.

Most coordinators earn their position because of the body of work, not because the ownership demands that the HC hire the coordinator they want.


Stop guessing, it's meaningless.

How hasn't Tomsula's body of work earneda DC spot?
generaldreedle
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 46
Joined: Sep 04, 2014
       

Re: Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#982 » by generaldreedle » Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:17 pm

The Gase issue is like Patterson said, it's the process that's concerning. It's like the firing of Harbaugh; I can understand Harbaugh has a shelf life, and that his offense had problems that maybe he was too stubborn to address, but the whisper campaign, the bs press conference, etc., was not good , Kawakami even republished an old column he wrote about Singletary, that he deserved to be fired but that the whisper campaign, again by the Yorks, was unfair.
I_am_1z
Starter
Posts: 2,172
And1: 68
Joined: Aug 22, 2014
     

Re: Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#983 » by I_am_1z » Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:14 pm

generaldreedle wrote:The Gase issue is like Patterson said, it's the process that's concerning. It's like the firing of Harbaugh; I can understand Harbaugh has a shelf life, and that his offense had problems that maybe he was too stubborn to address, but the whisper campaign, the bs press conference, etc., was not good , Kawakami even republished an old column he wrote about Singletary, that he deserved to be fired but that the whisper campaign, again by the Yorks, was unfair.


But they were right in firing Sing and they were right in hiring Harbaugh. I'm thankful they didn't wait another year to fire Harbaugh just because they felt they owed it to him.
generaldreedle
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 46
Joined: Sep 04, 2014
       

Re: Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#984 » by generaldreedle » Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:24 pm

I_am_1z wrote:But they were right in firing Sing and they were right in hiring Harbaugh. I'm thankful they didn't wait another year to fire Harbaugh just because they felt they owed it to him.


If at the end of this year, York and Baalke had met with Harbaugh and basically said, "Look, the offense is a mess, Kaepernick has not developed the way we had all envisioned, you have a ton of offensive coaches each calling plays, what is your plan for moving forward and improving?" and Harbaugh had no new ideas beyond sticking loyally with his guys, then letting him go would be reasonable, but these things started this time last year, when Kaepernick and co came within a Richard Sherman fingertip of going to their 2nd Super Bowl, so it was obviously personality driven, and they knew Harbaugh was going to be difficult when they hired him. Also their fascination with Tomsula was interesting, if they were so intent on having continuity in the defense, they probably could have hired Gase and maybe kept Fangio, Gase MIGHT have been more willing to accept Fangio as his DC and Fangio might have been more willing to stay if he wasn't passed over for someone below him.
Ray_Dogg
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,908
And1: 269
Joined: May 09, 2014
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#985 » by Ray_Dogg » Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:30 pm

@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.
I_am_1z
Starter
Posts: 2,172
And1: 68
Joined: Aug 22, 2014
     

Re: Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#986 » by I_am_1z » Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:42 pm

generaldreedle wrote:
I_am_1z wrote:But they were right in firing Sing and they were right in hiring Harbaugh. I'm thankful they didn't wait another year to fire Harbaugh just because they felt they owed it to him.


If at the end of this year, York and Baalke had met with Harbaugh and basically said, "Look, the offense is a mess, Kaepernick has not developed the way we had all envisioned, you have a ton of offensive coaches each calling plays, what is your plan for moving forward and improving?" and Harbaugh had no new ideas beyond sticking loyally with his guys, then letting him go would be reasonable, but these things started this time last year, when Kaepernick and co came within a Richard Sherman fingertip of going to their 2nd Super Bowl, so it was obviously personality driven, and they knew Harbaugh was going to be difficult when they hired him. Also their fascination with Tomsula was interesting, if they were so intent on having continuity in the defense, they probably could have hired Gase and maybe kept Fangio, Gase MIGHT have been more willing to accept Fangio as his DC and Fangio might have been more willing to stay if he wasn't passed over for someone below him.


I think this whole thing started in the SB vs the Ravens. How Gore wasn't able to run it, when we had the ball on their GL. The next year we lost some silly games because of playcalling and it allowed the Seahawks to take home field advantage throughout the playoffs. Then there were reports of wanting to trade Harbaugh. Despite the reports we kept the gun aimed at our foot, consistently losing games due to bad playcalling. I think he was deservingly fired
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,291
And1: 291
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#987 » by Pattersonca65 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:51 pm

Ray_Dogg wrote:@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.


If that was Jed who was insisting on Tomsula, that is truly ridiculous. Jed doesn't have a football background. This is what Al Davis did. It doesn't work and top head coaching prospects will not go to a team where the owner dictates who the assistants are going to be
generaldreedle
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 46
Joined: Sep 04, 2014
       

Re: Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#988 » by generaldreedle » Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:03 pm

Ray_Dogg wrote:@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.


Ughh, that type of meddling is a recipe for a bad franchise, I can't imagine Baalke would have insisted on tomsula over fangio.
-AC-
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 7
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#989 » by -AC- » Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:12 pm

Ray_Dogg wrote:@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.


Wasn't it Baalke who met with Gase for seven hours in Denver... Was York in Denver as well?
User avatar
DoobieKeebler
Senior
Posts: 693
And1: 34
Joined: Aug 18, 2014
Location: Northern Califas
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#990 » by DoobieKeebler » Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:18 pm

"Sources: If 49ers hired Gase, Fangio would have stayed"

http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/sources-if-49ers-hired-gase-fangio-would-have-stayed
generaldreedle
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 46
Joined: Sep 04, 2014
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#991 » by generaldreedle » Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:26 pm

DoobieKeebler wrote:"Sources: If 49ers hired Gase, Fangio would have stayed"

http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/sources-if-49ers-hired-gase-fangio-would-have-stayed



So their options were: 1) Gase running the team as HC and offensive mind, turning the defensive side of the ball over to Fangio, whom the players respected; or 2) Make Tomsula HC, and then _____ as OC?
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,291
And1: 291
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#992 » by Pattersonca65 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:10 pm

-AC- wrote:
Ray_Dogg wrote:@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.


Wasn't it Baalke who met with Gase for seven hours in Denver... Was York in Denver as well?

Not sure, I am sure Jed would have told Baalke what the conditions were including retaining Tomsula as DC. They could have even done a phone conference. I just find it hard to believe Baalke, who is pretty bright football guy, would insist on retaining Tomsula this way. This just appears Jed has a thing for Tomsula.
Ray_Dogg
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,908
And1: 269
Joined: May 09, 2014
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#993 » by Ray_Dogg » Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:11 pm

-AC- wrote:
Ray_Dogg wrote:@AlbertBreer: Source said Adam Gase's pitch to the Niners was to a) keep Vic Fangio as DC if he was willing or b) hire Vance Joseph from Cincinnati. ...
@AlbertBreer: ... There was the chance Fangio would've left any way, and the Bengals did block Joseph. But interesting Gase wanted to keep Fangio.

Then Jed insisted on Tomsula as the DC and eventually HC.


Wasn't it Baalke who met with Gase for seven hours in Denver... Was York in Denver as well?


Baalke flew back and talked to York. That is when the decision changed. It's pretty obvious Jed want d to keep Tomsula. Baalke is paid by Jed so he isn't gonna draw a line in the sand on that.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,291
And1: 291
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#994 » by Pattersonca65 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:42 pm

generaldreedle wrote:
DoobieKeebler wrote:"Sources: If 49ers hired Gase, Fangio would have stayed"

http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/sources-if-49ers-hired-gase-fangio-would-have-stayed



So their options were: 1) Gase running the team as HC and offensive mind, turning the defensive side of the ball over to Fangio, whom the players respected; or 2) Make Tomsula HC, and then _____ as OC?


I would have taken option 1. I was not thrilled with Gase, but if it meant keeping the defensive coaching staff intact, at least we retained one of the top DCs and there was continuity. Add to that, Gase doesn't have to get that much out of the offense when comparing it to Harbaugh/Roman's tenure.
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#995 » by CalamityX12 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:09 pm

I hate York n baalke more than ever
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
Jikkle
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,054
And1: 428
Joined: Aug 24, 2014
         

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#996 » by Jikkle » Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:13 am

I don't have a problem with Tomsula getting a shot as a DC but the issue is that being made a condition for Gase and possibly other candidates as well.

It's just not a good way of doing business to force coaches especially coordinators on new head coaches. Of course guys are going to turn you down because they want to work with people they know and have a shared vision and comfort level with. I wouldn't want a guy that I didn't chose for the job to be a reason my career could be adversely affected if he isn't up to snuff.

And to top it all off the front office has the audacity to offer him the OC position to work under the guy he wouldn't take as DC. So the only reason he doesn't get the HC gig is because he wouldn't take Tomsula as DC but now for some reason completely beyond my comprehension they think he would work UNDER Tomsula as OC?

If all this is true then I'm deeply concerned as a fan.

Instead of bringing in an offensive minded guy that potentially could've brought a system and life to the offense while keeping the defensive staff that had the defense playing at an elite level Jed just decided to completely blow the whole thing up for one guy that is unproven whose coaching chops mainly come from NFL Europe.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,291
And1: 291
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#997 » by Pattersonca65 » Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:12 pm

Jikkle wrote:I don't have a problem with Tomsula getting a shot as a DC but the issue is that being made a condition for Gase and possibly other candidates as well.

It's just not a good way of doing business to force coaches especially coordinators on new head coaches. Of course guys are going to turn you down because they want to work with people they know and have a shared vision and comfort level with. I wouldn't want a guy that I didn't chose for the job to be a reason my career could be adversely affected if he isn't up to snuff.

And to top it all off the front office has the audacity to offer him the OC position to work under the guy he wouldn't take as DC. So the only reason he doesn't get the HC gig is because he wouldn't take Tomsula as DC but now for some reason completely beyond my comprehension they think he would work UNDER Tomsula as OC?

If all this is true then I'm deeply concerned as a fan.

Instead of bringing in an offensive minded guy that potentially could've brought a system and life to the offense while keeping the defensive staff that had the defense playing at an elite level Jed just decided to completely blow the whole thing up for one guy that is unproven line coach whose coaching chops mainly come from NFL Europe.


I added line coach to your statement. That is it in a nutshell. I think if Fangio was HC, he would have been able to attract a good OC here.
zman1
Rookie
Posts: 1,171
And1: 170
Joined: Sep 15, 2014
   

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#998 » by zman1 » Fri Feb 27, 2015 5:50 pm

I was told by a family member last night that he had seen an SI article on the Niners coaching hiring. It said that they had Gase set to hire as HC, and at the last minute told him he had to hire Tomsula for OC. He said no and walked. Anyone else seen that article?
-AC-
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 7
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
       

Re: Jim Tomsula, the new Niners' head coach 

Post#999 » by -AC- » Fri Feb 27, 2015 7:28 pm

zman1 wrote:I was told by a family member last night that he had seen an SI article on the Niners coaching hiring. It said that they had Gase set to hire as HC, and at the last minute told him he had to hire Tomsula for OC. He said no and walked. Anyone else seen that article?


If you read the rest of this page from top to bottom you'll see it... Not much Niner news slips through the cracks with this group...

Return to San Francisco 49ers