1. ATL
2. CAR
3. CLE
4. DAL
5. OAK
6. CIN
7. NE
8. NO
9. BUF
10. KC
Hmmmmmmm....

Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82
NinerSickness wrote:Through week 5, PFF ranked these as the top O-lines in the league:
1. ATL
2. CAR
3. CLE
4. DAL
5. OAK
6. CIN
7. NE
8. NO
9. BUF
10. KC
Hmmmmmmm....
Pattersonca65 wrote:Well? Aren't you gonna share your opinion on this?
NinerSickness wrote:Pattersonca65 wrote:Well? Aren't you gonna share your opinion on this?
Nope!
DoobieKeebler wrote:Kind of surprised KC is in the top 10. Wasn't Dodub saying KC's line was historically awful this year?
Pattersonca65 wrote:DoobieKeebler wrote:Kind of surprised KC is in the top 10. Wasn't Dodub saying KC's line was historically awful this year?
That is what I heard also. I haven't paid that much attention to some of the listed teams except for the Raiders and from what I have seen of them, they pass block well.
Pattersonca65 wrote:NinerSickness wrote:Through week 5, PFF ranked these as the top O-lines in the league:
1. ATL
2. CAR
3. CLE
4. DAL
5. OAK
6. CIN
7. NE
8. NO
9. BUF
10. KC
Hmmmmmmm....
Well? Aren't you gonna share your opinion on this?
MHSL82 wrote:Pattersonca65 wrote:NinerSickness wrote:Through week 5, PFF ranked these as the top O-lines in the league:
1. ATL
2. CAR
3. CLE
4. DAL
5. OAK
6. CIN
7. NE
8. NO
9. BUF
10. KC
Hmmmmmmm....
Well? Aren't you gonna share your opinion on this?
I think he is referring to Atlanta having a great oline and Matt Ryan not succeeding. There was also that article about how the receivers were letting him down when the receivers really were the main reason why he was doing as well as he was before.
Hangman_52 wrote:That was through week 5. ATL was 5 and 0 with that offensive line. What were the line rankings post week 5? Does that show a decrease in line play to go along with all their losing?