2014 Rookies Thread
Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 231
- And1: 6
- Joined: Sep 02, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Tre Mason is killing it today. Granted it's against the Raiders, but he's bern picking up steam lately.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Johnny Rookie B***h (as Andre Reed called him):
6/13
4.6 YPA
0 TDs
2 Picks.

6/13
4.6 YPA
0 TDs
2 Picks.

Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 15,818
- And1: 2,535
- Joined: Mar 15, 2012
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Odb is great
The ModFather
My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 68
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Justin Gilbert fans, where are you on his progress? He's being benched for Pierre Desir/Buster Skrine. Whitner called his rookie season wasted. The guy IMO needs to play safety, just like Ward
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
- clyde21
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,579
- And1: 70,006
- Joined: Aug 20, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
I_am_1z wrote:Justin Gilbert fans, where are you on his progress? He's being benched for Pierre Desir/Buster Skrine. Whitner called his rookie season wasted. The guy IMO needs to play safety, just like Ward
He got called out on his work ethic. Didn't put in enough time in the film room and on the practice field. That's not gonna cut it in the NFL, and I was a huge fan of his.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12087 ... osh-gordon
Both of these knuckleheads (Gordon & Manziel) were absent for the walk through yesterday; led to Gordon's suspension. The team had trouble locating them.
QBs deserve a few years before they're labelled a bust (even the ones who suck as badly as Manziel), but this guy is going full steam ahead towards bustville.
Both of these knuckleheads (Gordon & Manziel) were absent for the walk through yesterday; led to Gordon's suspension. The team had trouble locating them.
QBs deserve a few years before they're labelled a bust (even the ones who suck as badly as Manziel), but this guy is going full steam ahead towards bustville.

Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,513
- And1: 77
- Joined: Aug 21, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Manziel is Ryan Leaf part duex
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
My guy Connor Shaw isn't having a bad first game. Especially against the Ravens.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 68
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
If Martavis Bryant can play with this kind of confidence all the time, he's going to be unstoppable.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
49er4life1979 wrote:NinerSickness wrote:clyde21 wrote:Brandin Cooks like good but let's keep things in perspective - Drew Brees and that offense also have something to do with that. If he was on, say, the Raiders, he wouldn't have half the production.
If he were on the Raiders, he'd be the #1 receiver; so I think he' might have more production.
Cooks is in the perfect offense for him, but he's also perfect for that offense.
I disagree. Drew Brees has a lot to do with his success. Why is Cooks any different than Tavon Austin? He is couple inches taller and thats it. Both are explosive. But one BIG difference. One has Drew Brees, the other has Austin Davis. End of discussion.
Bump for the Sith lord agreeing with me on this one. Belichick on Brandin Cooks:
"I'm glad we don't have to play him twice a year and he's not in our division," Belichick said, via The Times-Picayune. "He's a really good player."
It's going to be interesting to see Tavon Austin's production this year compared to Brandin Cooks'...
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 68
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
NinerSickness wrote:49er4life1979 wrote:NinerSickness wrote:
If he were on the Raiders, he'd be the #1 receiver; so I think he' might have more production.
Cooks is in the perfect offense for him, but he's also perfect for that offense.
I disagree. Drew Brees has a lot to do with his success. Why is Cooks any different than Tavon Austin? He is couple inches taller and thats it. Both are explosive. But one BIG difference. One has Drew Brees, the other has Austin Davis. End of discussion.
Bump for the Sith lord agreeing with me on this one. Belichick on Brandin Cooks:
"I'm glad we don't have to play him twice a year and he's not in our division," Belichick said, via The Times-Picayune. "He's a really good player."
It's going to be interesting to see Tavon Austin's production this year compared to Brandin Cooks'...
The Pats have the worst secondary I've ever seen on paper this year.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
I_am_1z wrote:NinerSickness wrote:49er4life1979 wrote:
I disagree. Drew Brees has a lot to do with his success. Why is Cooks any different than Tavon Austin? He is couple inches taller and thats it. Both are explosive. But one BIG difference. One has Drew Brees, the other has Austin Davis. End of discussion.
Bump for the Sith lord agreeing with me on this one. Belichick on Brandin Cooks:
"I'm glad we don't have to play him twice a year and he's not in our division," Belichick said, via The Times-Picayune. "He's a really good player."
It's going to be interesting to see Tavon Austin's production this year compared to Brandin Cooks'...
The Pats have the worst secondary I've ever seen on paper this year.
Man Brandin Cooks must have a Fico score of like 305 because he simply can't get any credit.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
- clyde21
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,579
- And1: 70,006
- Joined: Aug 20, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
I don't get what point of your bump was. No one said Cooks isn't any good.
That said, Tavon Austin has definitely disappointed. Thought he'd make a much bigger impact in the NFL.
That said, Tavon Austin has definitely disappointed. Thought he'd make a much bigger impact in the NFL.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 68
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
NinerSickness wrote:I_am_1z wrote:NinerSickness wrote:
Bump for the Sith lord agreeing with me on this one. Belichick on Brandin Cooks:
"I'm glad we don't have to play him twice a year and he's not in our division," Belichick said, via The Times-Picayune. "He's a really good player."
It's going to be interesting to see Tavon Austin's production this year compared to Brandin Cooks'...
The Pats have the worst secondary I've ever seen on paper this year.
Man Brandin Cooks must have a Fico score of like 305 because he simply can't get any credit.
I'm going to take that back. I'm preparing for the fantasy football season and I'm realizing the Raiders will be the worst secondary defending the pass this year. The Raiders at least have Khalil Mack coming off the edge though.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Kind of weird to bump this old thread, but something's been bugging me for 2 years...
Remember Tennessee Vols' OL James Stone? He went undrafted last year. Literally nobody else on planet earth was talking about this guy, and I started to think he was a figment of my imagination. He's now the #1 backup interiour OL for the Falcons.
Not exactly the next Larry Allen, but that's pretty great for an UDFA in year 2. If memory serves, I think he even got some significant playing time last year.
I get really frustrated when I think about this guy. He was there for the taking!
Not as frustrated as I get when I think about La'El Collins, but I still get really frustrated.
Remember Tennessee Vols' OL James Stone? He went undrafted last year. Literally nobody else on planet earth was talking about this guy, and I started to think he was a figment of my imagination. He's now the #1 backup interiour OL for the Falcons.
Not exactly the next Larry Allen, but that's pretty great for an UDFA in year 2. If memory serves, I think he even got some significant playing time last year.
I get really frustrated when I think about this guy. He was there for the taking!

Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 68
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
Allen Robinson and Martavis Bryant.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
So what do people think about Jadaveon Clowney at this point? Is he getting back to his old self after his nasty injury?
He has 4.5 sacks this year, but I keep reading about what a terror he's been on defense this season. Is that legit?
He has 4.5 sacks this year, but I keep reading about what a terror he's been on defense this season. Is that legit?
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,832
- And1: 229
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
NinerSickness wrote:So what do people think about Jadaveon Clowney at this point? Is he getting back to his old self after his nasty injury?
He has 4.5 sacks this year, but I keep reading about what a terror he's been on defense this season. Is that legit?
He's had a string of bad luck. Has yet to be 100% healthy as a pro. They should have put him on IR last year much earlier. He missed the majority of training camp and has been playing at 90% all year. No, he's no terror as of yet. But this offseason could prove why he was so coveted as a pass rusher. If / when he gets fully healthy that Texans defense will be scary good.
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
-
Re: 2014 Rookies Thread
I've highlighted where I was right in this thread, but it's time to eat some crow where I was wrong.
I said Mike Mayock was trying to get too cute when he said Mack was better than Clowney (which is weird because I thought he was really good the last few years). We haven't really seen Clowney at full strength yet, but it looks like Mayock was right.
Well done Mikey.
I said Mike Mayock was trying to get too cute when he said Mack was better than Clowney (which is weird because I thought he was really good the last few years). We haven't really seen Clowney at full strength yet, but it looks like Mayock was right.
Well done Mikey.