Jikkle wrote:https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2024/opp.htm
A lot has been made about the defensive line getting pressure and going through the numbers they aren't as bad as a lot of people think they are.
I'd say given the fact that we blitz a league-low 6.5% of the time being 11th in pressure percentage at 21.7% is pretty solid. Teams that are barely ahead of us are blitzing 20+% of the time
That's why I still contend the backend is a way bigger problem than the defensive line getting pressure. The defensive line isn't going to instantly melt guys in front of them all the time so you do have to force the QB to hold onto the ball a little bit for guys to win and get home. Coverage has gotta make the QB work a little bit to find an open man instead of dropping back and letting it rip as soon as the dropback is complete.
How many resources have been invested into the DL's of those other teams? I gotta believe that SF is near the top of that list.
Also, some of those teams utilize "Edge" position players as their primary pass rushers, but are basically outside linebackers. That being the case, I'm not sure we can use raw pressure % team stats as a gauge to blanketly evaluate DL's.
To me, if we can take anything substantial from those stats its that the 49ers need to blitz more. They are too predictable, and are getting routinely beaten with these basic schemes. What they are doing is not working, so they need to make adjustments to schemes and play calling. Of course more blitzes probably isn't the answer, at least not by itself. However dropping 7,8 into coverage is not working. If there is a chance that sending an extra defender or 2 after the QB will allow somebody to get home more often then they should dial up a few more blitzes.