RealGM

Ray_Dogg wrote:

CalamityX12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:
http://www.fieldgulls.com/football-breakdowns/2013/5/31/4382318/the-seahawks-and-the-4-3-under-front-winds-of-change
http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2013/1/19/3890928/gus-bradley-defense-leo-position

very good read Ray, thanks for that.

At first I was thinking we could have our Leo/Elephant in Armstead as a free lance linemen but regress that we would need more of a speedy guy.

Is that Lynch perhaps? Between Lynch or Brooks almost.

We need that NT... Poe or Hankins, some are calling for Brandon Williams..... sh*t, maybe a healthy Iwill could make a return?

Still like Allen in that "assumed" defense, if not Thomas....

Yep we need a LEO. More undersized versatile pass rusher. Lynch would need to be the Lynch of two years ago. Ideally we get an upgrade here.

We need a NT.

We need a Will or Mike. Bowman can play one.

We need a large run stuffing 5 Tech DE like Red Bryant.

So that is two dline spots where I don't see Buckner or Armstead as good fits. NT (1 Tech) and DE (5 Tech)

Basically we have two 3 Techs and only need one. Ugh.

CalamityX12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

CalamityX12 wrote:OK i'll need some football 101 refresh in regards to the supposed new 43 defense....

I thought someone like Allen could play in it... but Thomas would be a great addition IMO.

http://www.fieldgulls.com/football-breakdowns/2013/5/31/4382318/the-seahawks-and-the-4-3-under-front-winds-of-change
http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2013/1/19/3890928/gus-bradley-defense-leo-position

very good read Ray, thanks for that.

At first I was thinking we could have our Leo/Elephant in Armstead as a free lance linemen but regress that we would need more of a speedy guy.

Is that Lynch perhaps? Between Lynch or Brooks almost.

We need that NT... Poe or Hankins, some are calling for Brandon Williams..... sh*t, maybe a healthy Iwill could make a return?

Still like Allen in that "assumed" defense, if not Thomas....

Dodub wrote:

CalamityX12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:
http://www.fieldgulls.com/football-breakdowns/2013/5/31/4382318/the-seahawks-and-the-4-3-under-front-winds-of-change
http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2013/1/19/3890928/gus-bradley-defense-leo-position

very good read Ray, thanks for that.

At first I was thinking we could have our Leo/Elephant in Armstead as a free lance linemen but regress that we would need more of a speedy guy.

Is that Lynch perhaps? Between Lynch or Brooks almost.

We need that NT... Poe or Hankins, some are calling for Brandon Williams..... sh*t, maybe a healthy Iwill could make a return?

Still like Allen in that "assumed" defense, if not Thomas....

Basically we need a NT (hopefully Williams) and a LEO which is basically a speedy edge rusher. There are some available like Chandler Jones and Melvin Ingram but Tim Williams would also be great in that role

Ray_Dogg wrote:

Read on Twitter

ChrisPozz wrote:Barrows speculates on Robert Saleh's future with the 49ers

http://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/103661-barrows-speculates-robert-salehs-future-49ers/

Consider me highly skeptical of the idea that Saleh comes in with the understanding he's better than 50/50 going to be a placeholder for the job. I'm not saying he won't quickly be replaced but I'm skeptical there's an understanding that there's a strong possibility he'll be replaced if Fangio, for example, is freed.

Dodub wrote:This info extends Brooks' career with us. He's perfect for that role and will be hard to replace.

Read on Twitter

ChrisPozz wrote:If there was ever any doubt, and there shouldn't have been, Louis Riddick said tonight on SportsCenter that he was basically a package deal with Josh McDaniels. If McDaniels wasn't going to be the HC, then Riddick wasn't going to get/take that job.

ChrisPozz wrote:If there was ever any doubt, and there shouldn't have been, Louis Riddick said tonight on SportsCenter that he was basically a package deal with Josh McDaniels. If McDaniels wasn't going to be the HC, then Riddick wasn't going to get/take that job.