CalamityX12 wrote:Bingo_AlphaMan wrote:clyde21 wrote:
Peterson still the best RB prospect I ever watched, but Barkley's up there. Might be second for me.
He’s going as far back as 25 years. If I were to go back that far for me I would rank them like this:
1.) Adrian Peterson
2.) Ricky Williams
3.) Garrison Hearst
4.) Leonard Fournette
5.) Todd Gurley
6.) Kijana Carter
7.) Saquon Barkley / Ezekiel Elliot
9.) Reggie Bush
10.) Dalvin Cook
**Willis McGahee could have been in the top 3 hadn’t it been for the devastating knee injury he sustained. I’m no doctor but I still don’t think he was ever the same after that injury. He lost some explosiveness.
McGahee was an unreal animal back in the Hurricane days... that guy, if the head was right, could've been so much more in the NFL if it weren't for the injury. IMO
I usually cringe when I hear people say, "(So and so) is the best (position) prospect I've seen in (X) years."
The ONE guy I know FOR SURE is that FOR ME is Adrian Peterson. Best RB prospect I've seen in at least the past 20 years and I have a hard time putting anybody above him if I go back the past 30. Twenty years is my range for STUDYING these guys but I have somewhat of a good handle on guys who go back 30. I didn't have an issue with him fitting into any offense. I didn't have an issue fitting in with any coaching staff. I didn't have an issue with him fitting around any different sorts of players. I didn't have an issue with him as a student of the game. He was as close to a "you can not screw this guy's future up" guy as I think I had ever seen. His body failing him was far and away his biggest challenge from the day he stepped on a field.
I always had some feelings and emotions that Calvin Johnson could have been the best WR I ever saw, even as a college project going in, but it's a push-and-pull thing for me where I can't say definitively that there was no doubt in my mind before he got to the NFL and that no argument could be made against him as he played in the NFL. Part of it is not something he could control and that's the position he played and the offense he came from. That's why there's that disclaimer.
Choosing guys from different eras is also another thing in all this and it's a reason why I don't have more of these conversations with people because I'm not real comfortable with understanding every little difference and putting everything in a place where I feel like it's a fair argument. I just don't feel good when I do it.
-------------
Going back to the RB list. I've had Steven Jackson on mine. Hearst and Fournette wouldn't appear on mine and I had more uneasy feelings/questions on Gurley than most people did. Bush isn't on my list either. Maybe I'm just a goofy dude with RBs to some people.
Barkley is on there but of all the guys that would be on the top list to me he might have the lowest floor/highest bust chance. For the love of God I hope there isn't any sensitive Barkley people out there that read that who think that I'm saying he'll hit that floor. I'm not saying that. For the love of God I just said he's on my all-time list of guys coming into the NFL (going back 20-30 years).
I just think his floor is lower than other guys
on that list. There's some guys in the league that I think could take him and because of their scheme and what they ask of their backs take away from the Saquon Barkley experience. And obviously a lot will fall on Barkley where his ceiling and floor will be set at, too. That's another push-pull thing. As I've said the improvisational/freelancing things are a big reason why he's great but there's some running systems where that won't work on an all-time level. And if his PT is dependent on him sticking to script all the time then his floor lowers and he could end up coming in at closer to where his floor is at than where his ceiling could be.