Cactus Jack wrote:CrimsonCrew wrote:Big J wrote:
Same could be said about Purdy also. We saw how he looked under pressure during the Browns, Vikings, and Ravens games.
Purdy has already done more in the clutch than Geno has over his entire career.
I don't want to make this into a Purdy vs. Geno debate. Because Purdy has played very well.
But Geno actually led the league in come from behind, game winning drives last season (5). He was very clutch in that sense. Look, I get it. There's still a stigma around him. But the guy has been very good at times. Especially when he has time to throw.
It's true that Geno plays better when he has a clean pocket. It's why the Goff comparison I think is a fair one. He's still one of the more underrated QB's imo. He should also thrive in this new offense. If anyone here has watched UW the last couple of years, you'll know what I mean.
You also have to understand that he was one of the most pressured QB's last season (47%). The OL was one of the worst pass blocking units last year, according to most metrics. Both starting Tackles missed significant time & they we're basically rotating guys in & out each week. It's why his stats took a dip last season.
Geno has had a real career resurgence. And I'm not going to pretend that I have watched all of his games - though I probably watch the Seahawks more than any team other than the Niners. He was stellar for the first half of 2022, but he's been pretty shaky since then. And sure, OL issues are likely part of that, but he has some pretty significant limitations.
In terms of his comeback wins, there's something to be said for that, but the context matters. Purdy could have had a comeback win in the SB, but he didn't because the defense didn't get it done on three consecutive drives to put the game away.
Geno beat AZ (4-13) by one in a comeback effort, but they missed two FGs on their final two drives, including a longer one (51 yards) as time expired.
He knocked off the Titans (6-11) with two late TDs, and the D sacked Tannehill twice on the ensuing drive.
He drove the length of the field against Washington (4-13) for a late FG to win it. Nice drive with two good passes to Metcalf (curiously, the game log refers to them as short passes despite both going for 10+ yards in the air).
He had a nice drive to beat the Browns (11-6) with a TD late, though he was set up on the 50 by an INT and had the advantage of being able to play for the tie in a three-point game while also going for the win. Still, this was probably his most impressive comeback given the circumstances.
And he beat the Lions (12-5) with a TD drive in OT (thanks for that, BTW). That said, a pick-six gave him a 10-point lead in the 4th quarter. After the Lions responded with a TD, he had the chance to put the game away with a drive in regulation. Instead, on third down (3rd and 18 due to penalty, to be fair), he took one of the dumbest sacks I have ever seen. Right at the two-minute warning - so the Lions wouldn't have had to use a TO either way - he ran all over the field like a chicken with his head cut off despite multiple opportunities to get rid of the ball, and ultimately got sacked at the three for a loss of 17 yards. That play arguably single-handedly allowed the Lions to tie the game with a FG, and was about as unclutch as you can get. That said, he had a nice drive in OT.
I don't give him too much credit for beating three bottom-dwelling teams at the buzzer. The Cleveland and Detroit games were big wins in big situations, but the Lions game in particular was kind of a **** show (Myers missed two FGs, though one was a 56-yarder; Seahawks' first TD came in a sequence where they ran four consecutive 1st and Goal plays due to penalties).
I know you don't want to make this a Purdy-Smith discussion, and I don't either, but I will point out that Purdy just wasn't in position to have many comeback wins. Literally none of his regulation wins were single-score games (they beat the Rams 30-23, but that included a Rams' FG as time expired). That said, in the five games one-score games he played last year, he generally played well down the stretch. He drove the length of the field to set up a 40-yard FG against Cleveland, but Moody missed. I detailed Minnesota game above. He easily played well enough to win until he was probably concussed. But he led 4th quarter comebacks in the first two playoff games, and ended the SB with three drives to put his team in the lead. Those are clutch performances in big situations, and Geno hasn't necessarily shown that - granted he hasn't necessarily had the chance.
Anyway, Hawks are improved, young, and I'm terrified of them in two or three years if they can find a QB or Geno takes the next step. This year, I think we'll still have their number, but I agree that this offense should suit Geno and his skill players. Should be interesting to see how it shakes out.
And caveat to everything is that I think the new KO rules could be a real wild card for us this year. KO coverage has been our Achilles heel the past several years, and the new rules seem likely to only make that worse.
Okay, really got to get back to work now....