San Francisco @ Buffalo

arich35 · Post #201 » by **arich35** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:00 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:WHY TAKE OUT MASON

Seemed like the play called worked, LB punched it out I think

Jikkle · Post #202 » by **Jikkle** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:00 am

Wow we forced a punt

RIPskaterdude · Post #203 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:01 am

arich35 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:WHY TAKE OUT MASON

Seemed like the play called worked, LB punched it out I think

Mason has a 7.6 average right now and Kyle decides to give it to the FB. Disgusting

Dodub · Post #204 » by **Dodub** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:02 am

arich35 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:WHY TAKE OUT MASON

Seemed like the play called worked, LB punched it out I think

The playcall didn’t work. He got stopped before the end zone and fumbled. Why give it to the fullback when Mason did most of the work?

Jikkle · Post #205 » by **Jikkle** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:02 am

Time to go empty sets and air it out.

Dodub · Post #206 » by **Dodub** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:02 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:
arich35 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:WHY TAKE OUT MASON

Seemed like the play called worked, LB punched it out I think
Mason has a 7.6 average right now and Kyle decides to give it to the FB. Disgusting

He needs to be relieved of his playcalling duties

thesack12 · Post #207 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:03 am

Also still missing a dumb penalty calling back a big play

Dodub · Post #208 » by **Dodub** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:03 am

Jikkle wrote:Time to go empty sets and air it out.

Running the ball downhill has worked, we just get stupid in the red zone

RIPskaterdude · Post #209 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:03 am

Purdy isn't the problem this season, but at the same time, this team has so much dead cap coming, it makes no sense to sign him to 60+ per

thesack12 · Post #210 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:04 am

Teetering on being a fumble there, Jennings was in the process of making a "football move"

Great play by the defender

CrimsonCrew · Post #211 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:04 am

No one can stop the run and we come out throwing.

RIPskaterdude · Post #212 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:05 am

Just fantastic play calling

thesack12 · Post #213 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:05 am

Nice drop George

3 & out baby

Dodub · Post #214 » by **Dodub** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:07 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:Purdy isn't the problem this season, but at the same time, this team has so much dead cap coming, it makes no sense to sign him to 60+ per

He also hasn’t been the solution. He’s been wildly mediocre and underwhelming this season. Paying him top QB money doesn’t make sense. Firstly, he still has another year on his contract. Secondly, no one else would pay him that money.

arich35 · Post #215 » by **arich35** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:07 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:Purdy isn't the problem this season, but at the same time, this team has so much dead cap coming, it makes no sense to sign him to 60+ per

I think we have all come to the conclusion we don't want to give him 60M. Very few QBs deserve that much

thesack12 · Post #216 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:09 am

CrimsonCrew wrote:No one can stop the run and we come out throwing.

I hear you, but they had 2 decent pass plays. Took a great play by the defender to knock the ball out of Jennings' hands on 1st down, and Kittle had blockers in front of him on 3rd down but he dropped it

thesack12 · Post #217 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:10 am

Dodub wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:Purdy isn't the problem this season, but at the same time, this team has so much dead cap coming, it makes no sense to sign him to 60+ per

He also hasn’t been the solution. He’s been wildly mediocre and underwhelming this season. Paying him top QB money doesn’t make sense. Firstly, he still has another year on his contract. Secondly, no one else would pay him that money.

You are really underestimating the desperation and stupidity of NFL GM's, here

Jikkle · Post #218 » by **Jikkle** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:12 am

Why not go for it since it's not like our offense is going to score points.

thesack12 · Post #219 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:12 am

Why the eff would you go for it McDermott?

You have FIRM control of this game, no reason to risk SF getting some momentum

thesack12 · Post #220 » by **thesack12** » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:13 am

thesack12 wrote:Why the eff would you go for it McDermott?

You have FIRM control of this game, no reason to risk SF getting some momentum

LOL, shows what I know

I forgot this was the SF defense we are talking about