ImageImageImageImageImage

The Brock Purdy Thread

Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82

Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2061 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:06 am

Y’all coming around to my line of thinking yet?
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,376
And1: 2,717
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2062 » by thesack12 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:10 am

Big J wrote:Y’all coming around to my line of thinking yet?


No, you are the dodgiest poster I've ever seen in the 16 years I've been on this site.

You were completely MIA last week when Brock had a helluva game, and are barking loudly after tonight.

You'd get a lot more respect, if you stood up in all situations.
Pattersonca65
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,519
And1: 313
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2063 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:12 am

Big J wrote:Y’all coming around to my line of thinking yet?

You are a clown and your posts are old and tired.
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2064 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:29 am

thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:Y’all coming around to my line of thinking yet?


No, you are the dodgiest poster I've ever seen in the 16 years I've been on this site.

You were completely MIA last week when Brock had a helluva game, and are barking loudly after tonight.

You'd get a lot more respect, if you stood up in all situations.


I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,376
And1: 2,717
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2065 » by thesack12 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:32 am

Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:Y’all coming around to my line of thinking yet?


No, you are the dodgiest poster I've ever seen in the 16 years I've been on this site.

You were completely MIA last week when Brock had a helluva game, and are barking loudly after tonight.

You'd get a lot more respect, if you stood up in all situations.


I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,132
And1: 70,279
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2066 » by clyde21 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:33 am

don't want to sound like a broken record but 4/140 is plenty fair for Brock, instant security heading into next season. if again he says no, by all means go out next season and prove it.

still want us to try and trade for McCarthy tho, if possible
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Pattersonca65
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,519
And1: 313
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2067 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:37 am

thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
No, you are the dodgiest poster I've ever seen in the 16 years I've been on this site.

You were completely MIA last week when Brock had a helluva game, and are barking loudly after tonight.

You'd get a lot more respect, if you stood up in all situations.


I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Unfortunate all it takes is one board cancer to take a board down
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2068 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:41 am

thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
No, you are the dodgiest poster I've ever seen in the 16 years I've been on this site.

You were completely MIA last week when Brock had a helluva game, and are barking loudly after tonight.

You'd get a lot more respect, if you stood up in all situations.


I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,376
And1: 2,717
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2069 » by thesack12 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:43 am

Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:
I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.


This is not relevant to what was being discussed.

Way to move the goal posts... yet again
Pattersonca65
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,519
And1: 313
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2070 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:43 am

Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:
I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.

No you wouldnt. You are full of it. Go kiss your Lance poster
arich35
General Manager
Posts: 9,370
And1: 994
Joined: Mar 04, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2071 » by arich35 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:48 am

Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:
I’ve been consistent in thinking the exact same things about him that I’ve always said for the last 2 years. Who cares if he had a good game last week. Jimmy had great games also.


You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.


I think you are just oblivious. There will never be "the guy" in Kyle Shanahan run team, that isn't the type of QB he likes and he will be even more scared of trying to find a Mahomes, Allen, Jackson type QB because they aren't what he wants after Lance. Purdy is the exact type of QB he loves for what he wants to run
Pattersonca65
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,519
And1: 313
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2072 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:59 am

arich35 wrote:
Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
You obviously care if he has great games, because you are nowhere to be found then.


Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.


I think you are just oblivious. There will never be "the guy" in Kyle Shanahan run team, that isn't the type of QB he likes and he will be even more scared of trying to find a Mahomes, Allen, Jackson type QB because they aren't what he wants after Lance. Purdy is the exact type of QB he loves for what he wants to run


Right now i almost want the 49ers to pay Purdy $60 million so this dimwit wont have anything to talk about and maybe go.pollute some other board
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 9,042
And1: 3,144
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2073 » by Samurai » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:42 am

Pattersonca65 wrote:
arich35 wrote:
Big J wrote:
Look man, I’d love for Purdy to be “the guy”. He just isn’t, and it’s pretty painfully obvious that he’s a mid tier starter with a low ceiling. If he was elite no one here would have a problem paying him top dollar, but it’s obvious that he’s not that guy.


I think you are just oblivious. There will never be "the guy" in Kyle Shanahan run team, that isn't the type of QB he likes and he will be even more scared of trying to find a Mahomes, Allen, Jackson type QB because they aren't what he wants after Lance. Purdy is the exact type of QB he loves for what he wants to run


Right now i almost want the 49ers to pay Purdy $60 million so this dimwit wont have anything to talk about and maybe go.pollute some other board

Having nothing (intelligent) to talk about hasn't stopped him so far, thus the odds of that succeeding are about as high as the Niners playoff chances right now. He's probably already on the Cowboys' board boasting at how great Lance has done since he got his chance to shine with Dak hurt so.....never mind.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,132
And1: 70,279
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2074 » by clyde21 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 am

arich35 wrote:
I think you are just oblivious. There will never be "the guy" in Kyle Shanahan run team, that isn't the type of QB he likes and he will be even more scared of trying to find a Mahomes, Allen, Jackson type QB because they aren't what he wants after Lance. Purdy is the exact type of QB he loves for what he wants to run


that's probably true but it's all the more reason why the 60m a yr should be off the table. not saying you're pushing for that but I hope that narrative dies down.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2075 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 9:33 am

One thing that no one here can deny is that Purdy is straight up bad in poor weather. That’s become quite obvious at this point.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,690
And1: 6,510
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2076 » by CharityStripe34 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:47 pm

Big J wrote:One thing that no one here can deny is that Purdy is straight up bad in poor weather. That’s become quite obvious at this point.
I don't think he had that much trouble throwing the ball yesterday. The pick when he threw to Jennings was just a poor decision.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2077 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:19 pm

CharityStripe34 wrote:
Big J wrote:One thing that no one here can deny is that Purdy is straight up bad in poor weather. That’s become quite obvious at this point.
I don't think he had that much trouble throwing the ball yesterday. The pick when he threw to Jennings was just a poor decision.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app


Maybe the weather has a mental effect on him.
CrimsonCrew
RealGM
Posts: 13,720
And1: 1,315
Joined: Aug 21, 2014
 

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2078 » by CrimsonCrew » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:28 pm

CharityStripe34 wrote:
Big J wrote:One thing that no one here can deny is that Purdy is straight up bad in poor weather. That’s become quite obvious at this point.
I don't think he had that much trouble throwing the ball yesterday. The pick when he threw to Jennings was just a poor decision.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app


Until the INT, I would have said Purdy was having a better game than Stafford, who should have had at least two easy INTs. But neithr QB was good, and Purdy repeatedly missed open guys deep. Nothing on offense was working. The OL came crashing back to earth after a good game last week. Guerendo missed a couple holes and didn't have a lot of room. I won't even start in on Deebo, who had maybe his worst game ever, but even Jennings had a couple flat-out drops. We were constantly in third-and-longs. Once again, only Kittle really showed up at all.

The INT just cant' happen, though. I didn't see it myself, but apparently we had two or three open guys (which makes sense, as Jennings was triple covered). We were in FG range. It was second down. You just can't force that ball in that game with the season literally on the line. If Brock is both physically limited and makes awful decisions, you almost have to walk away. I'm not saying they should do that, but that was a really discouraging decision, and my cap for him at this point is probably $40 million.
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2079 » by Big J » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:36 pm

CrimsonCrew wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:
Big J wrote:One thing that no one here can deny is that Purdy is straight up bad in poor weather. That’s become quite obvious at this point.
I don't think he had that much trouble throwing the ball yesterday. The pick when he threw to Jennings was just a poor decision.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app


Until the INT, I would have said Purdy was having a better game than Stafford, who should have had at least two easy INTs. But neithr QB was good, and Purdy repeatedly missed open guys deep. Nothing on offense was working. The OL came crashing back to earth after a good game last week. Guerendo missed a couple holes and didn't have a lot of room. I won't even start in on Deebo, who had maybe his worst game ever, but even Jennings had a couple flat-out drops. We were constantly in third-and-longs. Once again, only Kittle really showed up at all.

The INT just cant' happen, though. I didn't see it myself, but apparently we had two or three open guys (which makes sense, as Jennings was triple covered). We were in FG range. It was second down. You just can't force that ball in that game with the season literally on the line. If Brock is both physically limited and makes awful decisions, you almost have to walk away. I'm not saying they should do that, but that was a really discouraging decision, and my cap for him at this point is probably $40 million.


Glad to hear you are coming around to my side of the fence. Takes guts man.
Pattersonca65
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,519
And1: 313
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2080 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:52 pm

Big J wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:I don't think he had that much trouble throwing the ball yesterday. The pick when he threw to Jennings was just a poor decision.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app


Until the INT, I would have said Purdy was having a better game than Stafford, who should have had at least two easy INTs. But neithr QB was good, and Purdy repeatedly missed open guys deep. Nothing on offense was working. The OL came crashing back to earth after a good game last week. Guerendo missed a couple holes and didn't have a lot of room. I won't even start in on Deebo, who had maybe his worst game ever, but even Jennings had a couple flat-out drops. We were constantly in third-and-longs. Once again, only Kittle really showed up at all.

The INT just cant' happen, though. I didn't see it myself, but apparently we had two or three open guys (which makes sense, as Jennings was triple covered). We were in FG range. It was second down. You just can't force that ball in that game with the season literally on the line. If Brock is both physically limited and makes awful decisions, you almost have to walk away. I'm not saying they should do that, but that was a really discouraging decision, and my cap for him at this point is probably $40 million.


Glad to hear you are coming around to my side of the fence. Takes guts man.

No one is coming around to your opinion. No one is that clueless on this board.

Return to San Francisco 49ers