ImageImageImageImageImage

The Brock Purdy Thread

Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82

Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2301 » by Pattersonca65 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 5:05 pm

CrimsonCrew wrote:I should add that Cousins doesn't really move the needle for me, though if he's super cheap, I guess I'd kick the tires.

Kirk Cousins is 36 and could not crack top ten in his prime. to begin If Kirk Cousins is the starter just blow it up now and start over.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2302 » by thesack12 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:22 pm

Read on Twitter


But, Purdy can't run though
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2303 » by thesack12 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:23 pm

Read on Twitter
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2304 » by thesack12 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:26 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:I should add that Cousins doesn't really move the needle for me, though if he's super cheap, I guess I'd kick the tires.

Kirk Cousins is 36 and could not crack top ten in his prime. to begin If Kirk Cousins is the starter just blow it up now and start over.


Cousins' raw stats would lead you to believe that me might be in the top 10 discussion. However, in practicality hes certainly not.

Cousins is a proven failure in prime time/big game situations. Kirk has never been a guy that you want to hang your team's hat on, especially if you have intentions on being a contender.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2305 » by thesack12 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:32 pm

Read on Twitter
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2306 » by Pattersonca65 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:38 pm

thesack12 wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:I should add that Cousins doesn't really move the needle for me, though if he's super cheap, I guess I'd kick the tires.

Kirk Cousins is 36 and could not crack top ten in his prime. to begin If Kirk Cousins is the starter just blow it up now and start over.


Cousins' raw stats would lead you to believe that me might be in the top 10 discussion. However, in practicality hes certainly not.

Cousins is a proven failure in prime time/big game situations. Kirk has never been a guy that you want to hang your team's hat on, especially if you have intentions on being a contender.


And he is 36 years old and looked awful before being benched. He was replaced by a rookie who played better. He only has value as an experienced backup. If the team wants to save money using Cousins just blow it up.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 93,241
And1: 37,137
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2307 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Feb 19, 2025 4:43 am

There's no doubt Purdy is better than Cousins, but this scenario is if he wants 55 to 60M per with a high guaranteed, and the Raiders will give you their 1st and future 1st. Who else would you want to be a QB for cheap? Cousins would be best on the market
Image
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2308 » by thesack12 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:12 pm

Read on Twitter
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2309 » by Big J » Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:53 pm

Cousins or Rodgers could easily give us similar production to Purdy at a way lower salary. It’s basically a no brainer.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2310 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 4:11 pm

RIPskaterdude wrote:There's no doubt Purdy is better than Cousins, but this scenario is if he wants 55 to 60M per with a high guaranteed, and the Raiders will give you their 1st and future 1st. Who else would you want to be a QB for cheap? Cousins would be best on the market

Cousins is shot. If you take cousins, just blow the team up. He was so bad they had to be benched and he is turning 37. You want cheap, you will get cheap. Forget Cousins and forget Rodgers
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2311 » by Big J » Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:51 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:There's no doubt Purdy is better than Cousins, but this scenario is if he wants 55 to 60M per with a high guaranteed, and the Raiders will give you their 1st and future 1st. Who else would you want to be a QB for cheap? Cousins would be best on the market

Cousins is shot. If you take cousins, just blow the team up. He was so bad they had to be benched and he is turning 37. You want cheap, you will get cheap. Forget Cousins and forget Rodgers


If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2312 » by thesack12 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:31 pm

Big J wrote:Cousins or Rodgers could easily give us similar production to Purdy at a way lower salary. It’s basically a no brainer.


Yeah, those guys' production has been so good the last couple years that each of them have had 2 separate teams move on from them.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2313 » by thesack12 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:31 pm

Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:There's no doubt Purdy is better than Cousins, but this scenario is if he wants 55 to 60M per with a high guaranteed, and the Raiders will give you their 1st and future 1st. Who else would you want to be a QB for cheap? Cousins would be best on the market

Cousins is shot. If you take cousins, just blow the team up. He was so bad they had to be benched and he is turning 37. You want cheap, you will get cheap. Forget Cousins and forget Rodgers


If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.


You are forgetting the part where Denver had a historically good defense.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2314 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:56 pm

thesack12 wrote:
Read on Twitter


But, Purdy can't run though


But misses a QB who can't read defenses or run a pro-style offense.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2315 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:59 pm

Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:There's no doubt Purdy is better than Cousins, but this scenario is if he wants 55 to 60M per with a high guaranteed, and the Raiders will give you their 1st and future 1st. Who else would you want to be a QB for cheap? Cousins would be best on the market

Cousins is shot. If you take cousins, just blow the team up. He was so bad they had to be benched and he is turning 37. You want cheap, you will get cheap. Forget Cousins and forget Rodgers


If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.


Cousins was so bad, so inaccurate last year they had to bench him for a someone who had not thrown a pass. Who gives a sh-t about a rebuilding the lines. Just blow everything up if you are going with a washed up soon to be 37 year old QB who was never top ten to begin with.
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2316 » by Big J » Wed Feb 19, 2025 10:08 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:Cousins is shot. If you take cousins, just blow the team up. He was so bad they had to be benched and he is turning 37. You want cheap, you will get cheap. Forget Cousins and forget Rodgers


If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.


Cousins was so bad, so inaccurate last year they had to bench him for a someone who had not thrown a pass. Who gives a sh-t about a rebuilding the lines. Just blow everything up if you are going with a washed up soon to be 37 year old QB who was never top ten to begin with.


Better than having a QB that was never top ten and also not being able to build our lines.
arich35
General Manager
Posts: 9,344
And1: 992
Joined: Mar 04, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2317 » by arich35 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 10:49 pm

Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Big J wrote:
If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.


Cousins was so bad, so inaccurate last year they had to bench him for a someone who had not thrown a pass. Who gives a sh-t about a rebuilding the lines. Just blow everything up if you are going with a washed up soon to be 37 year old QB who was never top ten to begin with.


Better than having a QB that was never top ten and also not being able to build our lines.


:crazy: :crazy:
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2318 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:42 pm

Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Big J wrote:
If we sign cousins or Rodgers we can afford to rebuild the lines around them. Peyton Manning won a ring when his body was shot.


Cousins was so bad, so inaccurate last year they had to bench him for a someone who had not thrown a pass. Who gives a sh-t about a rebuilding the lines. Just blow everything up if you are going with a washed up soon to be 37 year old QB who was never top ten to begin with.


Better than having a QB that was never top ten and also not being able to build our lines.


The lines are not going to get built through free agency. They get built though the draft. The process will be the same regardless of who the QB is.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 311
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2319 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:43 pm

arich35 wrote:
Big J wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Cousins was so bad, so inaccurate last year they had to bench him for a someone who had not thrown a pass. Who gives a sh-t about a rebuilding the lines. Just blow everything up if you are going with a washed up soon to be 37 year old QB who was never top ten to begin with.


Better than having a QB that was never top ten and also not being able to build our lines.


:crazy: :crazy:


LOL, except he already has been top ten. LOL, this guy suggested the 49ers bring in Deshaun Watson. Genius
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: The Brock Purdy Thread 

Post#2320 » by Big J » Thu Feb 20, 2025 12:13 am

Pattersonca65 wrote:
arich35 wrote:
Big J wrote:
Better than having a QB that was never top ten and also not being able to build our lines.


:crazy: :crazy:


LOL, except he already has been top ten. LOL, this guy suggested the 49ers bring in Deshaun Watson. Genius


Most rankings have him outside of the top 10.

Return to San Francisco 49ers