San Francisco @ Buffalo
Moderators: MHSL82, CalamityX12
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Now wasting 3rd down stops
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Dodub wrote:Imagine if Juice doesn’t fumble and Moody makes his field goals lol
Butteryfly effect would come into play, but having those 10 points (not counting the 55 yarder) would make this a completely different game right now
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,812
- And1: 618
- Joined: Aug 19, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
The fact that we keep going downfield is mind blowing
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Dodub wrote:The fact that we keep going downfield is mind blowing
Its a 3 possession game, and the D is shaky at best
Not saying they should completely abandon the run game, but they have to lean on the pass now
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Doesn't really matter if its a fumble or not
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,812
- And1: 618
- Joined: Aug 19, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Why aren’t we running the ball lol
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,964
- And1: 418
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
12 men on defense again..
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,812
- And1: 618
- Joined: Aug 19, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
thesack12 wrote:Dodub wrote:The fact that we keep going downfield is mind blowing
Its a 3 possession game, and the D is shaky at best
Not saying they should completely abandon the run game, but they have to lean on the pass now
I don’t agree. They are much more consistent and much more likely to break a big play on the ground in these conditions.
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
12 man penalty coming in a dead ball situation off a turnover
Brilliant, just brilliant
Brilliant, just brilliant
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,812
- And1: 618
- Joined: Aug 19, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Jikkle wrote:12 men on defense again..
Fire the entire coaching staff
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,826
- And1: 924
- Joined: Mar 04, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
2nd week in a row with 12 men
Fire the whole defensive staff
Fire the whole defensive staff
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Dodub wrote:thesack12 wrote:Dodub wrote:The fact that we keep going downfield is mind blowing
Its a 3 possession game, and the D is shaky at best
Not saying they should completely abandon the run game, but they have to lean on the pass now
I don’t agree. They are much more consistent and much more likely to break a big play on the ground in these conditions.
I agree with that, however the clock is also a factor
But the turnover made it all moot anyways
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Pretty much untouched, nice
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,789
- And1: 37,007
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Watching the replay on that TD, the entire team other than Warner just sat there and watched

Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,297
- And1: 2,621
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
- Location: N DA NAP
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
And there's the special team's gaffe
Not that it matters
Not that it matters
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,895
- And1: 3,112
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Little late but there is the ST miscue that we were waiting for.
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,964
- And1: 418
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Bills ball
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,964
- And1: 418
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
This team needs massive changes so I'm all in for losing out in embarrassing fashion.
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,964
- And1: 418
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
They are already putting backups in.
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,895
- And1: 3,112
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: San Francisco @ Buffalo
Jikkle wrote:They are already putting backups in.
Could have done that in the first quarter; can't imagine the score could be much worse.