Week 5: Cardinals @ 49ers

Post #481 » by **Harry Palmer** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:15 pm

Big J wrote:GOD DAMMIT PURDY!

Purdy don’t be a franchise quarterback until he improves his pass blocking.

zman1 · Post #482 » by **zman1** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:16 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:
Big J wrote:GOD DAMMIT PURDY!

Purdy don’t be a franchise quarterback until he improves his pass blocking.

Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

CrimsonCrew · Post #483 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:17 pm

Jikkle wrote:Mason needed to pick up that man.

Mason had to get the inside guy. I think that was probably on McKivitz.

TheMonarch · Post #484 » by **TheMonarch** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:17 pm

zman1 wrote:
Big J wrote:GOD DAMMIT PURDY!
Purdy? Yeah, he should have blocked that guy and thrown it. That was on the line.
Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

Purdy had a bad game. I love him, but today he didn't have it.

thesack12 · Post #485 » by **thesack12** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:18 pm

Dodub wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Big J wrote:Our D is massively underrated by fans.

You were saying...

Our offense was as bad or worse than our defense today.

Offense wasn't great by any means, but they moved the ball well all day. If they had kicker, they had a red zone trip end in a turnover on downs so the likely would of score 3 more points which would have been enough to win.

But Gotta figure out the red zone issues for sure.

thesack12 · Post #486 » by **thesack12** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:22 pm

Also, special shout out to the roughing the passer penalty on Zona's last TD.

That let them go for 2, and SF loses by 1. Wihtout it, That late FG would've just made it a tie game.

But if you are gonna allow unblocked rushers a free and clear line to the QB, it wouldn't have mattered anyways.

Big J · Post #487 » by **Big J** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:25 pm

thesack12 wrote:
Dodub wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
You were saying...

Our offense was as bad or worse than our defense today.

Offense wasn't great by any means, but they moved the ball well all day. If they had kicker, they had a red zone trip end in a turnover on downs so the likely would of score 3 more points which would have been enough to win.

But Gotta figure out the red zone issues for sure.

Offense had the ball with a chance to win the game, that's all you should need as a good offense.

thesack12 · Post #488 » by **thesack12** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:25 pm

Big J wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Dodub wrote:
Our offense was as bad or worse than our defense today.

Offense wasn't great by any means, but they moved the ball well all day. If they had kicker, they had a red zone trip end in a turnover on downs so the likely would of score 3 more points which would have been enough to win.

But Gotta figure out the red zone issues for sure.

Offense had the ball with a chance to win the game, that's all you should need as a good offense.

Or a functional kicker

RIPskaterdude · Post #489 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:27 pm

Seattle lost at least

Jikkle · Post #490 » by **Jikkle** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:30 pm

What an embarrassing loss. This game should've been a complete blowout but yet all we had failures once again in all 3 phases.

Was not a great day for Purdy and while I don't blame him for the INTs his lack of sharpness cost us a couple of TDs.

Gotta blame Shanahan because this team has proven to be nonfunctional without CMC in the red zone. The offense struggled with Jimmy G in the red zone before CMC, get CMC redzone is great, and now under Purdy without CMC the offense is back to struggling in the red zone. So gotta pin that on Shanahan because it's up to him to design plays that work in the redzone not just between the 20s.

I've been preaching from the rooftops and I'll keep preaching that the defense needs a reboot this offseason. Whatever we're doing isn't work like it should and they have too much talent to play this mediocre.

I can forgive giving up 24 points but what I can't forgive is how they got those points.

The last two drives by the Cardinals were 12 plays 73 yards for a TD and 14 plays 75 yards for a FG. That's just completely unacceptable for what's supposed to be a top-tier defense. This defense routinely chokes when we absolutely need just one stop.

I'm still not counting them out since this team has had years when they suck early and put it together at the end but if Shanahan stays next season I do believe he does need some massive remodeling and we need fresh faces in all 3 phases.

arich35 · Post #491 » by **arich35** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:30 pm

somehow if we win on Thursday we are tied for 1st

zman1 · Post #492 » by **zman1** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:34 pm

arich35 wrote:somehow if we win on Thursday we are tied for 1st

Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

zman1 · Post #493 » by **zman1** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:35 pm

That last play kittle was wide open likely for 20 yards.

Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

Big J · Post #494 » by **Big J** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:43 pm

[x]

Read on Twitter

[/x]

Pattersonca65 · Post #495 » by **Pattersonca65** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:45 pm

Look it is Grant Clown

clyde21 · Post #496 » by **clyde21** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:45 pm

well, I guess silver lining is that Seattle lost, and this looks like a down year for the whole division

bad news is we look terrible

zman1 · Post #497 » by **zman1** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:47 pm

clyde21 wrote:well, I guess silver lining is that Seattle lost, and this looks like a down year for the whole division

bad news is we look terrible

I would say we are a good team that doesn't know how to win. We make mistakes instead of key plays.

Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

Big J · Post #498 » by **Big J** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:53 pm

zman1 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:well, I guess silver lining is that Seattle lost, and this looks like a down year for the whole division

bad news is we look terrible
I would say we are a good team that doesn't know how to win. We make mistakes instead of key plays.

Sent from my SM-X610 using Tapatalk

We need CMC back.

Pattersonca65 · Post #499 » by **Pattersonca65** » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:54 pm

CrimsonCrew wrote:
Jikkle wrote:Mason needed to pick up that man.

Mason had to get the inside guy. I think that was probably on McKivitz.

McKivitz has too many of these whiffs this year

wco81 · Post #500 » by **wco81** » Mon Oct 7, 2024 12:36 am

Fumble by Mason was the killer.

He's not bad for where he was drafted but the draft picks on RBs that they squandered sure hurts now.