ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 OFFSEASON

Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82

User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,053
And1: 70,237
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#561 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:17 pm

arich35 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
arich35 wrote:
What is the upside to cutting him now? Bring in another kicker to compete in training camp and let it play out.


because we've seen enough


Again, there is literally no upside to do it right now. I would rather wait and see, not sure if there are great alternatives out there or not. I still think that high ankle sprain he got last year messed with him quite a bit and I thought I saw some talk they brought him back probably a week or two early


upside? Who cares lol. the guy sucks and shouldn't be on the roster, and he'll just take a spot from someone else who should be competing for kicker. There is no scenario in which Moody should be on this team this season.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,939
And1: 6,395
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#562 » by Harry Palmer » Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:27 pm

Big J wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:Re: Brock, he has very little incentive to play this year without a new contract. It wouldn't be worth the injury risk. You can bake that threat of no extension and two years of the franchise tag into the negotiations, but at the end of the day, the Niners don't have much power to force his hand. If he sits out five games, he doesn't take much of a hit in earnings, but he could completely derail the Niners' season. And they're still in win-now mode to a degree.


If Purdy is the team first guy that he claims to be then he won't derail the Niners season.


Don’t be ridiculous.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,939
And1: 6,395
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#563 » by Harry Palmer » Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:39 pm

Hargrave never really worked out for us, but that doesn’t mean we won’t notice a pretty significant fall-off from him and w/e journeyman or rookie we slot in there. Ironically I think part of the reason he didn’t work out was Greenlaw not playing, I think it was envisioned at putting the OL in a pick your poison spot where the need to put more than one helmet on more than one guy or see Hargrave or Bosa beating single man or the LBs cut loose to fly at the ball. I kinda thought he’d be an obvious cut or renegotiation, but I was still thinking if they’re all healthy that’s gonna give teams problems.

But now they’re both gone so…but yeah, agree that Greenlaw is the biggest loss, both just in terms of his impact and the fact that we have no plan B that a contender with multiple other holes can rely on.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#564 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:56 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:
Big J wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:Re: Brock, he has very little incentive to play this year without a new contract. It wouldn't be worth the injury risk. You can bake that threat of no extension and two years of the franchise tag into the negotiations, but at the end of the day, the Niners don't have much power to force his hand. If he sits out five games, he doesn't take much of a hit in earnings, but he could completely derail the Niners' season. And they're still in win-now mode to a degree.


If Purdy is the team first guy that he claims to be then he won't derail the Niners season.


Don’t be ridiculous.


All he does is post ridiculous things
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#565 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:59 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:Hargrave never really worked out for us, but that doesn’t mean we won’t notice a pretty significant fall-off from him and w/e journeyman or rookie we slot in there. Ironically I think part of the reason he didn’t work out was Greenlaw not playing, I think it was envisioned at putting the OL in a pick your poison spot where the need to put more than one helmet on more than one guy or see Hargrave or Bosa beating single man or the LBs cut loose to fly at the ball. I kinda thought he’d be an obvious cut or renegotiation, but I was still thinking if they’re all healthy that’s gonna give teams problems.

But now they’re both gone so…but yeah, agree that Greenlaw is the biggest loss, both just in terms of his impact and the fact that we have no plan B that a contender with multiple other holes can rely on.


Hargrave was a poor run defender. I am not sure it will get much worse. We were hoping Greenlaw would come back but that was based on no teams taking a risk on signing Greenlaw to a multi year deal which Denver did.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#566 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:03 pm

49ers sign from Seahawks corner, Tre Brown. Not expecting much as a corner but could add to special teams.
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 32,928
And1: 16,515
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: The Last of Us Part II
       

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#567 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:19 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:49ers sign from Seahawks corner, Tre Brown. Not expecting much as a corner but could add to special teams.

Tre is depth. Not much more. Guy had a pretty rough year for them. Got benched.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#568 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:28 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:49ers sign from Seahawks corner, Tre Brown. Not expecting much as a corner but could add to special teams.

Tre is depth. Not much more. Guy had a pretty rough year for them. Got benched.


I read that. Not expecting much. Cornerback like OL is a premium position in the NFL, If he was even average he would have been signed long ago. They are looking for special teams players too.
CrimsonCrew
RealGM
Posts: 13,649
And1: 1,310
Joined: Aug 21, 2014
 

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#569 » by CrimsonCrew » Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:51 pm

I'm kind of baffled by the Floyd cut. We only save $1.5 million. It will cost more than that to replace him. He wasn't great, but he is a solid player who doesn't miss time to injury, and can be a valuable contributor and a part-time role. Given that we are so thin on the inside, and the fact that Gross-Matos could take some snaps inside on passing downs, it seems like this team would have been better in every case with Floyd on it.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,053
And1: 70,237
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#570 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:00 pm

CrimsonCrew wrote:I'm kind of baffled by the Floyd cut. We only save $1.5 million. It will cost more than that to replace him. He wasn't great, but he is a solid player who doesn't miss time to injury, and can be a valuable contributor and a part-time role. Given that we are so thin on the inside, and the fact that Gross-Matos could take some snaps inside on passing downs, it seems like this team would have been better in every case with Floyd on it.


yea i don't understand it, kinda assumed it's to make room for Joey but that didn't materialize at all, so not sure what their thought process here was tbh.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#571 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:02 pm

CrimsonCrew wrote:I'm kind of baffled by the Floyd cut. We only save $1.5 million. It will cost more than that to replace him. He wasn't great, but he is a solid player who doesn't miss time to injury, and can be a valuable contributor and a part-time role. Given that we are so thin on the inside, and the fact that Gross-Matos could take some snaps inside on passing downs, it seems like this team would have been better in every case with Floyd on it.


I think you are right. He did have eight sacks last year. It seems like the season isn't just about the money, Lynch really meant it when he said this team is old and needs to get younger. Seems like they are all in on a reboot this year and going to take all their lumps this year. The team certainly doesn't appear to be in trying to compete this year and are banking on the draft to become competitive after this year.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#572 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:05 pm

clyde21 wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:I'm kind of baffled by the Floyd cut. We only save $1.5 million. It will cost more than that to replace him. He wasn't great, but he is a solid player who doesn't miss time to injury, and can be a valuable contributor and a part-time role. Given that we are so thin on the inside, and the fact that Gross-Matos could take some snaps inside on passing downs, it seems like this team would have been better in every case with Floyd on it.


yea i don't understand it, kinda assumed it's to make room for Joey but that didn't materialize at all, so not sure what their thought process here was tbh.


I almost think they want to purge the roster of older and expensive players and it feels while they always want to win are basically taking their lumps this season with an eye for the future.
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,939
And1: 6,395
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#573 » by Harry Palmer » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:09 pm

Going to be interesting to see how the Kittle’s, CMCs and others who can least afford the wasted seasons react, but I guess they have largely chosen to do that with really high-character self-motivated guys.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,939
And1: 6,395
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#575 » by Harry Palmer » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:21 pm

Trent might be the biggest shoe to drop. Not sure he’s going to be too enthused about spending his last year or two retooling.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#576 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:24 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:Trent might be the biggest shoe to drop. Not sure he’s going to be too enthused about spending his last year or two retooling.

Maybe but he held out last year and got his money. I might have a bit more feeling for Kittle, a true team guy
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,939
And1: 6,395
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#577 » by Harry Palmer » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:30 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:Trent might be the biggest shoe to drop. Not sure he’s going to be too enthused about spending his last year or two retooling.

Maybe but he held out last year and got his money. I might have a bit more feeling for Kittle, a true team guy



Yeah, I think there a lot of realistic possibilities. Like I could see him deciding to take an off-year while the Niners contention does likewise, but coming back the year afterwards if we’re back. He’s such a unique guy it’s really hard to know what to expect. But quietly asking for a trade is imo definitely a possibility.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
arich35
General Manager
Posts: 9,170
And1: 955
Joined: Mar 04, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#578 » by arich35 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:54 pm

I don't think we are not going to be competitive. We haven't lost a ton from contributors last year, we need to hit on 3 or 4 draft picks that will be able to start like last year and last year's guys have to progress.
Pattersonca65
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,395
And1: 300
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
     

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#579 » by Pattersonca65 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:00 pm

arich35 wrote:I don't think we are not going to be competitive. We haven't lost a ton from contributors last year, we need to hit on 3 or 4 draft picks that will be able to start like last year and last year's guys have to progress.

True but last season the 49ers were 6-11 so I am not sure last season is a good baseline
CrimsonCrew
RealGM
Posts: 13,649
And1: 1,310
Joined: Aug 21, 2014
 

Re: 2025 OFFSEASON 

Post#580 » by CrimsonCrew » Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:03 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
CrimsonCrew wrote:I'm kind of baffled by the Floyd cut. We only save $1.5 million. It will cost more than that to replace him. He wasn't great, but he is a solid player who doesn't miss time to injury, and can be a valuable contributor and a part-time role. Given that we are so thin on the inside, and the fact that Gross-Matos could take some snaps inside on passing downs, it seems like this team would have been better in every case with Floyd on it.


I think you are right. He did have eight sacks last year. It seems like the season isn't just about the money, Lynch really meant it when he said this team is old and needs to get younger. Seems like they are all in on a reboot this year and going to take all their lumps this year. The team certainly doesn't appear to be in trying to compete this year and are banking on the draft to become competitive after this year.


The eight sacks probably don't accurately reflect his contribution. They were mostly of the clean-up variety. But there's still something to be said for playing hard through the whistle and being in the right place. He's not an impact player at this point, and he was probably overpaid (certainly $12 million for last season seems like an overpay), but there just isn't an appreciable benefit to cutting him. The savings were minimal, and he's off the books next year anyway. At least wait until we've added a replacement.

Return to San Francisco 49ers