Page 1 of 1
KEITH REASER
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:28 am
by 49er4life1979
I know Reaser wasnt one of the inactives, but did he play much last night? I dont recall seeing him. Was he in?
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:13 pm
by CalamityX12
Sometimes when you don't hear the secondary's name that's a good thing.
lol... I believe he was in, how active, i'm not sure.
I know Acker and DJ were in.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:51 pm
by Bald Bull
It was hard to see player numbers with red letters on black, but i don't remember his name called and he recorded no stats.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:32 pm
by I_am_1z
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Eric_Branch/status/643802247772573696[/tweet]
In another tweet he mentions Jimmy Ward had 13.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 1:23 am
by Pattersonca65
Reaser has 4.3 speed and a lot of potential. Could be a big part of the future. I think Acker won the competition. Acker has been really good so far
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 1:37 am
by I_am_1z
Pattersonca65 wrote:Reaser has 4.3 speed and a lot of potential. Could be a big part of the future. I think Acker won the competition. Acker has been really good so far
I'm really surprised that Acker won. I thought he would surely start against Minnesota since they're loaded with 4.3 and low 4.4 personnel. To not get a single snap on defense is baffling.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 1:46 am
by NinerSickness
How many snaps did Ward play?
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:56 am
by Ease_Ur_Storm
Think it was 13
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:56 am
by Ease_Ur_Storm
He actually started per maiocco
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:23 am
by ChrisPozz
NinerSickness wrote:How many snaps did Ward play?
13 out of 56. 9 in coverage, 3 vs. run, 1 rushing the passer. Thrown at once, not completed. And yes, technically he did receive a start as he was on the field for the first play.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:43 pm
by Pattersonca65
I_am_1z wrote:Pattersonca65 wrote:Reaser has 4.3 speed and a lot of potential. Could be a big part of the future. I think Acker won the competition. Acker has been really good so far
I'm really surprised that Acker won. I thought he would surely start against Minnesota since they're loaded with 4.3 and low 4.4 personnel. To not get a single snap on defense is baffling.
I am not that surprised about Acker winning. He looked really good all through training camp and made some big plays.
Re: KEITH REASER
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:53 pm
by Jikkle
Acker did get some training camp and preseason action last year not to mention his injury wasn't as serious as Reaser's so I just think he's ahead in terms of health and experience.
Like Brandon Thomas I expect Reaser to be a big part of the team but this season is basically a rookie year for them and they need to knock off some rust and get some reps in and build their bodies back up.