Page 1 of 6

GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:12 pm
by I_am_1z
Offense looks good/better with this backup RB in :)

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:15 pm
by CrimsonCrew
This is by far the worst D we've faced to date.

Man, our run D is appallingly bad. Why ever throw the ball?

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:18 pm
by ChrisPozz
CrimsonCrew wrote:This is by far the worst D we've faced to date.

Man, our run D is appallingly bad. Why ever throw the ball?


There's nothing in football that hurts worse than this. Nothing on the field is close IMO.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:20 pm
by CrimsonCrew
But hey, we got a stop!

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:20 pm
by I_am_1z
Any chance Mike Davis gets 150 yards from scrimmage today? That would be nice

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:21 pm
by CrimsonCrew
Kelly has fielded some criticism, and maybe justifiably, but if we had a QB who could reliably make accurate throws, this offense would be okay. Even with almost no talent at the receiving positions.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:22 pm
by Bald Bull
Can't blame Tory smith for that drop, he was probably in shock that a ball came his way

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:26 pm
by CrimsonCrew
Wow. How does their only viable receiver get that open???

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:26 pm
by Bald Bull
CrimsonCrew wrote:Wow. How does their only viable receiver get that open???

covered by brooks with no safety help? :crazy:

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:26 pm
by ChrisPozz
I have ZERO idea what that was.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:29 pm
by CrimsonCrew
They line up for 3rd and 13 with just two WRs. How do we not account for the two RBs? This D has problems....

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:31 pm
by ChrisPozz
CrimsonCrew wrote:They line up for 3rd and 13 with just two WRs. How do we not account for the two RBs? This D has problems....


Heavy DB personnel there. Has got to be partially on at least one of those.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:33 pm
by CrimsonCrew
I_am_1z wrote:Offense looks good/better with this backup RB in :)


You mean Dujuan Harris?

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:35 pm
by CrimsonCrew
That happened last week when we tried to hit that quick-hitter.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:35 pm
by ChrisPozz
CrimsonCrew wrote:
I_am_1z wrote:Offense looks good/better with this backup RB in :)


You mean Dujuan Harris?


Glen Coffee may be able to do this to them today. Maybe.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:39 pm
by dr3am
This team sucks. But the Bills was right about Kaep. He can't throw. Still a better QB then Gabbert with an athletic arm but no accuracy on his throws

Sent from my HTC One M9 using RealGM mobile app

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:42 pm
by ChrisPozz
A Niner near the QB side absolutely just annihilated Mike Evans following that interception. Just tattooed him. Couldn't see who it was he was moving so quickly. Brutal.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:42 pm
by ChrisPozz
ChrisPozz wrote:A Niner near the QB side absolutely just annihilated Mike Evans following that interception. Just tattooed him. Couldn't see who it was he was moving so quickly. Brutal.


And Evans is down writhing because of it. What a hit!

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:43 pm
by CrimsonCrew
Wow. That was impressive for both players. Didn't think that had a chance when he threw it.

Re: GDT: Mike Davis vs Bucs

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:43 pm
by ChrisPozz
ChrisPozz wrote:
ChrisPozz wrote:A Niner near the QB side absolutely just annihilated Mike Evans following that interception. Just tattooed him. Couldn't see who it was he was moving so quickly. Brutal.


And Evans is down writhing because of it. What a hit!


I should've known. It was Jimmie Ward that did it.