RealGM

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:
Yayyyyy Frisco is signing replacement caliber players across the board and not improving the talent base. Everybody rejoice!!!!!

Armed with a mountain of money, Excuse me for having a little higher hopes than this group of unwantedness being brought in.

Also, as I mentioned earlier you make these kind of fringe roster worthy player signings who may or may not be familiar with the system several weeks into free agency. If you can't see the significance in the timing of the signings, I can't help you.

Also, you bring in "bodies" in the form of UDFA's and veterans who are on the street in August.

Are we really going to be surprised if all 4 of those guys mentioned aren't on the 53?

This is incoherent. Clearly some of these signings are improving the talent base.
They aren't just signing guys who aren't familiar with the system. Lots of the guys are. I count three out of 9 that aren't. Bark, Juice and Goodwin.

Exactly wtf difference does waiting weeks make on signing these guys? Are you crying over the cost?
The significance in signing them now means you have them. You know all these guys are available weeks from now? GTFO

Training camp starts in July. But lets wait until August to sign guys. LOL. Wouldn't be nice to have your QBs working on their own with WRs beforehand either.

Again, Who cares how many guys make the 53. What exactly were we prevented from doing by signing them?

Seriously find something else to complain about.

We still have roughly $50M+ in salary cap space. Lets wait folks so we have money to spend on nothing. OK.

All your sopohomoric sensitivity to someone not agreeing with your views aside,

I need to hear an argument that Aldrick Robinson and his 52 catches in 50 games, Marquise Goodwin and his 49 catches in 39 games, Logan Paulsen a 30 year old blocking specialist TE are talent upgrades. I can't even say for without a shadow of a doubt that Barkley is better than Gabbert.

Make your case, I'm listening...

CalamityX12 wrote:As for WR, i'm ok holding off the spend there....

next year, Allen Robinson ALL DAY!

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

This is incoherent. Clearly some of these signings are improving the talent base.
They aren't just signing guys who aren't familiar with the system. Lots of the guys are. I count three out of 9 that aren't. Bark, Juice and Goodwin.

Exactly wtf difference does waiting weeks make on signing these guys? Are you crying over the cost?
The significance in signing them now means you have them. You know all these guys are available weeks from now? GTFO

Training camp starts in July. But lets wait until August to sign guys. LOL. Wouldn't be nice to have your QBs working on their own with WRs beforehand either.

Again, Who cares how many guys make the 53. What exactly were we prevented from doing by signing them?

Seriously find something else to complain about.

We still have roughly $50M+ in salary cap space. Lets wait folks so we have money to spend on nothing. OK.

All your sopohomoric sensitivity to someone not agreeing with your views aside,

I need to hear an argument that Aldrick Robinson and his 52 catches in 50 games, Marquise Goodwin and his 49 catches in 39 games, Logan Paulsen a 30 year old blocking specialist TE are talent upgrades. I can't even say for without a shadow of a doubt that Barkley is better than Gabbert.

Make your case, I'm listening...

The sensitive one is yourself. You need a box of **** tissues. You are complaining just to complain. It's sad.

Name me two WRs on the roster other than Kerley before we signed Aldrick and Goodwin who had better numbers?

Anyone that complains about overpaying is really flat out wasting their time and just trying to again, complain for the sake of complaining. THERE IS LITERALLY NOTHING WE ARE PREVENTING OURSELVES FROM DOING BUY PAYING THESE GUYS! We still have $50M plus this year alone.

We aren't strapped up to the cap limit needing to extend guys like Malcom Butler and Kirk Cousins for crying out loud. Seriously find something else to complain about. Something that actually makes sense like the fact that Malcolm Smith was horrible last season. That I can understand.

There were at least two other teams in the bidding for Juice. Guess what? We beat them. Guess what else? He's not going to play as just a blocking FB. So don't look at the numbers and winge about that.

CrimsonCrew wrote:More like $6 million for this year for Pryor, with $2 million in unlikely to be reached incentives. Damn. Wonder what we could have gotten him for on a longterm deal. I'm really surprised there wasn't more of a market for him.

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:
All your sopohomoric sensitivity to someone not agreeing with your views aside,

I need to hear an argument that Aldrick Robinson and his 52 catches in 50 games, Marquise Goodwin and his 49 catches in 39 games, Logan Paulsen a 30 year old blocking specialist TE are talent upgrades. I can't even say for without a shadow of a doubt that Barkley is better than Gabbert.

Make your case, I'm listening...

The sensitive one is yourself. You need a box of **** tissues. You are complaining just to complain. It's sad.

Name me two WRs on the roster other than Kerley before we signed Aldrick and Goodwin who had better numbers?

Anyone that complains about overpaying is really flat out wasting their time and just trying to again, complain for the sake of complaining. THERE IS LITERALLY NOTHING WE ARE PREVENTING OURSELVES FROM DOING BUY PAYING THESE GUYS! We still have $50M plus this year alone.

We aren't strapped up to the cap limit needing to extend guys like Malcom Butler and Kirk Cousins for crying out loud. Seriously find something else to complain about. Something that actually makes sense like the fact that Malcolm Smith was horrible last season. That I can understand.

There were at least two other teams in the bidding for Juice. Guess what? We beat them. Guess what else? He's not going to play as just a blocking FB. So don't look at the numbers and winge about that.

Lol, its looking like you aren't even reading the posts your are responding to.

Never once have I said that my disapproval with the signings I have talked about had to do with any financial related reasoning whatsoever.

Have fun arguing with the strawman you created.

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

The sensitive one is yourself. You need a box of **** tissues. You are complaining just to complain. It's sad.

Name me two WRs on the roster other than Kerley before we signed Aldrick and Goodwin who had better numbers?

Anyone that complains about overpaying is really flat out wasting their time and just trying to again, complain for the sake of complaining. THERE IS LITERALLY NOTHING WE ARE PREVENTING OURSELVES FROM DOING BUY PAYING THESE GUYS! We still have $50M plus this year alone.

We aren't strapped up to the cap limit needing to extend guys like Malcom Butler and Kirk Cousins for crying out loud. Seriously find something else to complain about. Something that actually makes sense like the fact that Malcolm Smith was horrible last season. That I can understand.

There were at least two other teams in the bidding for Juice. Guess what? We beat them. Guess what else? He's not going to play as just a blocking FB. So don't look at the numbers and winge about that.

Lol, its looking like you aren't even reading the posts your are responding to.

Never once have I said that my disapproval with the signings I have talked about had to do with any financial related reasoning whatsoever.

Have fun arguing with the strawman you created.

So you couldn't come up with guys on the roster that were better?
And they can still add scrubs and UDFA.

Kyle very clearly said that Garcon was the priority not Jeffery or Pryor.

Also, "Anyone" is not in reference to you. It's to stuff like this:
The Ringer guys said that they were intrigued with the 49ers signing that FB but that they don't see why the team gave him that much, as other teams weren't probably going to pay that kind of money for a FB.

Again, anyone complaining about what we have paid for guys is just looking for something to complain about.

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:
Lol, its looking like you aren't even reading the posts your are responding to.

Never once have I said that my disapproval with the signings I have talked about had to do with any financial related reasoning whatsoever.

Have fun arguing with the strawman you created.

So you couldn't come up with guys on the roster that were better?
And they can still add scrubs and UDFA.

Kyle very clearly said that Garcon was the priority not Jeffery or Pryor.

Also, "Anyone" is not in reference to you. It's to stuff like this:
The Ringer guys said that they were intrigued with the 49ers signing that FB but that they don't see why the team gave him that much, as other teams weren't probably going to pay that kind of money for a FB.

Again, anyone complaining about what we have paid for guys is just looking for something to complain about.

Still throwing out money related arguments when I clearly pointed out to you I haven't mentioned any financial related reasoning that influenced my opinion on the signings. You're precious, bro.

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:
So you couldn't come up with guys on the roster that were better?
And they can still add scrubs and UDFA.

Kyle very clearly said that Garcon was the priority not Jeffery or Pryor.

Also, "Anyone" is not in reference to you. It's to stuff like this:
The Ringer guys said that they were intrigued with the 49ers signing that FB but that they don't see why the team gave him that much, as other teams weren't probably going to pay that kind of money for a FB.

Again, anyone complaining about what we have paid for guys is just looking for something to complain about.

Still throwing out money related arguments when I clearly pointed out to you I haven't mentioned any financial related reasoning that influenced my opinion on the signings. You're precious, bro.

You must be dense.
I'm allowed to respond to multiple things mentioned in the thread in one post, it ain't all about you precious. I just pointed this out. You know the part where I said I'm talking about money because someone mentioned the talk of people complaining about it. Duh.
Did I say you, nope.

I did ask for you to name the WRs on the roster other than Kerley that are better than Goodwin and Robinson. So far, crickets.

thesack12 wrote:

Ray_Dogg wrote:

thesack12 wrote:
Still throwing out money related arguments when I clearly pointed out to you I haven't mentioned any financial related reasoning that influenced my opinion on the signings. You're precious, bro.

You must be dense.
I'm allowed to respond to multiple things mentioned in the thread in one post, it ain't all about you precious. I just pointed this out. You know the part where I said I'm talking about money because someone mentioned the talk of people complaining about it. Duh.
Did I say you, nope.

I did ask for you to name the WRs on the roster other than Kerley that are better than Goodwin and Robinson. So far, crickets.

You also know that the forum format allows you to make multiple posts in a thread, thus allowing you to not having to write every thought you have inside a post where you have quoted a particular post/person even, right?

I can do whatever I like. It's not my fault you didn't understand. "Anyone" is not "you" in my book. Especially when there are posts in the thread pertaining to money that I'm entitled to respond to. Did you post that? No, so stfu about it already.

Patton and Streater have had better production in their careers than Robinson/Goodwin. Since the idea is to upgrade the talent base from what you had on the field last season not whats currently on the roster prior to free agency/the draft, I'd say they are at best lateral moves.
I asked you to name me guys on the roster that are better. Patton and Streater aren't on the roster.

I mean lets be frank here, we are talking about guys who very well may be legitimately on the roster bubble yet I'm outlandish and "complaining just to be complaining" by questioning those being good signings?
I'm pretty confident Aldrick and Goodwin will be on the roster.

As for prioritizing Garcon over the other WR's, great they got their guy. Its the one signing I'm actually happy with. However, I think everybody is in agreement that WR needs a massive boost, so why not go after the other big fish as well? Its not like Garcon is a similar player to Jeffrey/Pryor.

You'd have to ask Kyle. Maybe he doesn't like their mental side of things. Maybe he doesn't like their fit. Maybe he wants Garcon playing the X.

CalamityX12 wrote:

Bingo_AlphaMan wrote:

Dodub wrote:Who was that on here that loved Barkley?

Read on Twitter

That would be me sir! On the other hand, Sick hates him with a passion. Just as much as he hated Vince Young.

Drew Stanton 2.0????

ChrisPozz wrote:

Read on Twitter