Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82
Bingo_AlphaMan wrote:NFL Scouts' Takes: Biggest Risers in the 2019 Draft Class
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2816710-nfl-scouts-takes-biggest-risers-in-the-2019-draft-class?share=other#slide8
CrimsonCrew wrote:Bingo_AlphaMan wrote:CrimsonCrew wrote:
Not sure I'm prepared to label that as "highly possible".... A trade with the Raiders alone seems quite unlikely, and it's hard to see them giving up #4 and a pick in the mid-20s to move up two spots. They have tons of needs, and are in a good position to land an impact player at #4. Who do you envision them moving up for? And if they do move up, it would probably be for a pass-rusher, diluting the pool of guys that we would be looking at at #4.
And if we did trade back to #4, we'd better then aggressively shop that pick to any team that might want a QB.
I can see Cardinals trading out of the #1 pick with either the Jags or the Giants so that they can get their QB. Which would then leave Bosa for us! At which point if they’re so in love and desperate enough to get Khalil Mack’s replacement in Bosa, then I see a scenario in which would cause them to give us their #4 and their 24th pick to get our #2 overall pick. It’s not a far fetched situation because this is a familiar territory for us— we traded out of the #2 pick a couple years ago with the Bears to move back one spot. So moving back 2 spots might require a 1st round pick.
1.) Haskins - Jags
2.) Bosa - Raiders
3.) Allen - Jets
4.) Williams - 49ers
And you’re right. At #4 I can see us trading back once more with the Giants or Broncos both of which would be targeting Kyler Murray.
If Bosa is there, though, I think that's actually a steal for the Raiders. If he falls, we probably need more than that to move off the pick. And it's optimistic to see Williams falling to #4. It's certainly possible, but I wouldn't count on it when contemplating that move. We also couldn't count on trading #4 if Haskins is already off the board. In your scenario, what do you do if it's Haskins, Bosa, Williams, and there's no market for the pick?
CrimsonCrew wrote:Word is that today's practices moved indoors due to weather, and media was not allowed. Sucks.
CrimsonCrew wrote:He's an interesting player who would probably be a nice complement to Pettis, but I'm not sure he'll be there in the 2nd, and I don't really want to use our 2nd on a WR for the second year in a row. If he's there, we probably have to consider him, but if the value is comparable I'd rather look at DE (depending upon our first round pick, of course), CB, S, or LB. OG is in the mix, too, but I'd like to think we could add a guy for the ZBS in the 3rd, 4th, or even 5th.
Bingo_AlphaMan wrote:CrimsonCrew wrote:He's an interesting player who would probably be a nice complement to Pettis, but I'm not sure he'll be there in the 2nd, and I don't really want to use our 2nd on a WR for the second year in a row. If he's there, we probably have to consider him, but if the value is comparable I'd rather look at DE (depending upon our first round pick, of course), CB, S, or LB. OG is in the mix, too, but I'd like to think we could add a guy for the ZBS in the 3rd, 4th, or even 5th.
We need depth behind George Kittle. I’d much rather draft his clone in T.J. Hockenson. We would destroy teams in 2 TE sets.
