CrimsonCrew wrote:thesack12 wrote:I_am_1z wrote:Does anyone have proof of Trey Lances powerful arm? I still think Justin Fields had the best arm strength, so I'm wondering why Zach Wilson and Trey Lance are regarded as stronger...
Depends on what qualifies as "proof" for you
https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-superlatives-quarterbacks-trevor-lawrence-justin-fields-trey-lance-mac-jonesThe 2021 quarterback class is hands down the single best PFF has ever scouted in its seven years of grading college football. That means these superlatives are quite literally the best of the best.
Strongest Arm: Trey Lance
Not only does Lance have easy juice on the ball already, but there’s also reason to think he could get even stronger because he is the youngest quarterback in the draft. Even in only one season of play, Lance still has throws all over his tape that make you say “wow” with the velocity he puts on them.
Yeah, that's not proof. There isn't necessarily a clear way to quantify arm strength. Is it the velocity with which the ball leaves the hand? Is it the distance it travels? If the former, I'd agree that Lance probably has the advantage. He can really drive the ball. His outs - when he hits them the way he wants - barely elevate above his hand. And on his deep balls, the ball explodes off his hand. Fields has more of an effortless quality to his throws, perhaps due in part to his more elongated throwing motion. In terms of distance they can throw it, I think it's a really close call. But Fields has way more control.
PFF also rates Lance as the better runner, and I'd take Fields over him pretty easily. They have a pretty similar running style. They can make guys miss, but they more often rely on their speed and power to make plays. Oddly, in citing a reason for that, Mike Renner (PFF's draft guy) mentioned Lance's yards after contact. Frankly, that's a dumb metric to use in this area. I've said this before, but any one of the guys Fields was playing against would have been the best defender on the field in Lance's games. And Fields made some of them look downright silly. Lance got a lot of yards running through LBs who weighed less than he did. Hell, he played in a game at one point in which the NT weighed something crazy, like 240. They're close, but I think Fields is a tick faster, stronger, and more elusive. And he's nails at sneaking the ball. Lance ran more, especially on called plays (oddly a ton of draws), but that doesn't make him the better runner.
Physically, these guys are really close, but Fields is more accurate. It's not even close. If we're rating on an NFL scale, I'd say Fields is an 8 or 9 out of 10 in accuracy. Lance is more like a 4 out of 10, if that. It's almost certainly the thing that's most likely to cause him to fail, if he does. He'll have to make big improvement to become an elite QB, or maybe even a good one.
This is what's had me scratching my head. Fields is clearly the better runner than Wilson and Lance, but he's being put in the same tier as them. Analytically, people say Fields is the most accurate passer of the draft. Then comes arm strength, and it seems comparable to the consensus top guy, Lance.
I'm really not understanding how Lance AND Wilson moved ahead of him.