ImageImageImageImageImage

Pacman in SF?

Moderators: MHSL82, CalamityX12

Commodor
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 959
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
     

Pacman in SF? 

Post#1 » by Commodor » Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:50 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5008445

Looks like we are willing to take a risk on possibly the most troubled athlete in professional sports. Could be a huge upgrade if he is able to turn his life around. Adam "Pacman" Jones with Shantae Spencer? Possibly Thomas or Mays coming in the draft? Our secondary could be very impressive.
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#2 » by ahonui06 » Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:07 pm

Pacman isn't that good. Too busy making it rain.
Commodor
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 959
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
     

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#3 » by Commodor » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:54 am

Wouldn't mind him for the right price
User avatar
Hotstove907
Rookie
Posts: 1,121
And1: 13
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: Alaska-Chicago

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#4 » by Hotstove907 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:53 am

Exactly if he's cheap, u can never have to many CB's. Plus returner maybe.
To quote GetSeven
With Jimmy at the 2 spot this lineup (along with depth) has the potential to be the best since the Jordan/Pippen days easy.
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#5 » by ahonui06 » Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:40 am

Pacman is a cancer. Get him away from SF. Go sign with Detroit where he can be a loser and blend in perfectly.
Commodor
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 959
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
     

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#6 » by Commodor » Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:17 am

How is he a cancer? He hasnt ruined any teams. He's a dumb as a brick off the field but I've never heard of him hurting team moral for the titans or cowboys.
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#7 » by ahonui06 » Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:09 pm

ivang101 wrote:How is he a cancer? He hasnt ruined any teams. He's a dumb as a brick off the field but I've never heard of him hurting team moral for the titans or cowboys.


He's a cancer because he's a moron and does stupid off-field activities that become a distraction to the rest of the team. Media would focus more on Pacman making it rain or beating some random guy than on the 49ers. I rather have a mediocre Tarell Brown than a mediocre Pacman. Pacman isn't even a good CB.
User avatar
and1GS
RealGM
Posts: 25,386
And1: 2,728
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
   

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#8 » by and1GS » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:39 pm

Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you" :lol: :lol:

KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#9 » by ahonui06 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:23 am

and1GS wrote:Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.


Rossum was OK but it seemed like he always wanted to run around east-west on punt returns before finally making a decision. Was frustrating at times.
Commodor
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 959
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
     

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#10 » by Commodor » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:56 am

Unless we get a solid player in the draft, Pacman can be solid depth at the CB position, and maybe after a solid year of work he can return to his Tennessee days. He's better than Roman and you all know it.
User avatar
and1GS
RealGM
Posts: 25,386
And1: 2,728
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
   

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#11 » by and1GS » Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:40 pm

ahonui06 wrote:
and1GS wrote:Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.


Rossum was OK but it seemed like he always wanted to run around east-west on punt returns before finally making a decision. Was frustrating at times.


Ya I moreso meant guys LIKE that, KR specialists through FA. And that was very weird with Rossum, he was fantastic in Atlanta.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you" :lol: :lol:

KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#12 » by ahonui06 » Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:18 am

Im sure SF could get Arenas in the 3rd or 4th round. Not only can he return but also play some secondary every once in awhile. Never hurts to have DB depth.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#13 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:21 pm

Pacman is still living off his name. He isn't that good anymore and he doesn't fit in with our culture we are building.
User avatar
and1GS
RealGM
Posts: 25,386
And1: 2,728
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
   

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#14 » by and1GS » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:40 am

Pretty sure the only reason he has notoriety and rapport within the league is because his official NFL name is so odd.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you" :lol: :lol:

KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
ahonui06
Banned User
Posts: 19,926
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Pacman in SF? 

Post#15 » by ahonui06 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:31 pm

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Pacman is still living off his name. He isn't that good anymore and he doesn't fit in with our culture we are building.


I am sure ivang would disagree. He seems enamored with players that have "names".

Return to San Francisco 49ers