Pacman in SF?
Moderators: MHSL82, CalamityX12
Pacman in SF?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 959
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Pacman in SF?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5008445
Looks like we are willing to take a risk on possibly the most troubled athlete in professional sports. Could be a huge upgrade if he is able to turn his life around. Adam "Pacman" Jones with Shantae Spencer? Possibly Thomas or Mays coming in the draft? Our secondary could be very impressive.
Looks like we are willing to take a risk on possibly the most troubled athlete in professional sports. Could be a huge upgrade if he is able to turn his life around. Adam "Pacman" Jones with Shantae Spencer? Possibly Thomas or Mays coming in the draft? Our secondary could be very impressive.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
Pacman isn't that good. Too busy making it rain.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 959
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
Wouldn't mind him for the right price
Re: Pacman in SF?
- Hotstove907
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,121
- And1: 13
- Joined: May 24, 2007
- Location: Alaska-Chicago
Re: Pacman in SF?
Exactly if he's cheap, u can never have to many CB's. Plus returner maybe.
To quote GetSeven
With Jimmy at the 2 spot this lineup (along with depth) has the potential to be the best since the Jordan/Pippen days easy.
With Jimmy at the 2 spot this lineup (along with depth) has the potential to be the best since the Jordan/Pippen days easy.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
Pacman is a cancer. Get him away from SF. Go sign with Detroit where he can be a loser and blend in perfectly.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 959
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
How is he a cancer? He hasnt ruined any teams. He's a dumb as a brick off the field but I've never heard of him hurting team moral for the titans or cowboys.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
ivang101 wrote:How is he a cancer? He hasnt ruined any teams. He's a dumb as a brick off the field but I've never heard of him hurting team moral for the titans or cowboys.
He's a cancer because he's a moron and does stupid off-field activities that become a distraction to the rest of the team. Media would focus more on Pacman making it rain or beating some random guy than on the 49ers. I rather have a mediocre Tarell Brown than a mediocre Pacman. Pacman isn't even a good CB.
Re: Pacman in SF?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you"


KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
and1GS wrote:Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.
Rossum was OK but it seemed like he always wanted to run around east-west on punt returns before finally making a decision. Was frustrating at times.
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 959
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
Unless we get a solid player in the draft, Pacman can be solid depth at the CB position, and maybe after a solid year of work he can return to his Tennessee days. He's better than Roman and you all know it.
Re: Pacman in SF?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
ahonui06 wrote:and1GS wrote:Bingo. Pacman is a sucky CB and a decent kick returner. We can find the latter late in the draft or through guys like Allen Rossum in FA. We don't need Pacman.
Rossum was OK but it seemed like he always wanted to run around east-west on punt returns before finally making a decision. Was frustrating at times.
Ya I moreso meant guys LIKE that, KR specialists through FA. And that was very weird with Rossum, he was fantastic in Atlanta.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you"


KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
Im sure SF could get Arenas in the 3rd or 4th round. Not only can he return but also play some secondary every once in awhile. Never hurts to have DB depth.
Re: Pacman in SF?
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
Pacman is still living off his name. He isn't that good anymore and he doesn't fit in with our culture we are building.
Re: Pacman in SF?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: Pacman in SF?
Pretty sure the only reason he has notoriety and rapport within the league is because his official NFL name is so odd.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you"


KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Re: Pacman in SF?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Pacman in SF?
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Pacman is still living off his name. He isn't that good anymore and he doesn't fit in with our culture we are building.
I am sure ivang would disagree. He seems enamored with players that have "names".