#1
#1
#2
#4
I would do it... reminds me of the 49ers' in 85 or 86
Draft would look like this
# 28 IN THE FIRST
# 31 IN THE FIRST
# 37 IN THE 2ND
# 63 IN THE 2ND
# 68 IN THE 3RD
But eales are not this dumb are they
Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
Moderator: Cactus Jack
Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,290
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 08, 2005
- Location: in the clouds
Re: Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
- HeavyP
- Starter
- Posts: 2,072
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 22, 2003
- Location: Bonney Lake, Washington
- Contact:
-
Re: Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
I don't think they're that dumb, unless for some reason they believe that they are one Michael Crabtree away from a championship.
Larry Fitzgerald did show them what an elite play maker can do.
So you know you have your #'s wrong, Philly has #21 (800 points there own), #28 (660 Carolina's), #53 (370)) #117 (60)
= 1890 points, which our pick is worth 1800 points. If they add their 3rd rounder and we add our third rounder we get #85 (165 points) but we lose #68 (250 points)
Eagles would be giving up #21, 28, 53, 85, 117 for #4, 68
that's 2055 for 2050 pretty fair. According to the chart, however usually people trading down have to give up more. So since we don't have a 5th round pick, I think we'd be better off just swapping their 4th for a 5th .
21 28 53 85 149 for 4 and 68.
I'd do it.
Larry Fitzgerald did show them what an elite play maker can do.
So you know you have your #'s wrong, Philly has #21 (800 points there own), #28 (660 Carolina's), #53 (370)) #117 (60)
= 1890 points, which our pick is worth 1800 points. If they add their 3rd rounder and we add our third rounder we get #85 (165 points) but we lose #68 (250 points)
Eagles would be giving up #21, 28, 53, 85, 117 for #4, 68
that's 2055 for 2050 pretty fair. According to the chart, however usually people trading down have to give up more. So since we don't have a 5th round pick, I think we'd be better off just swapping their 4th for a 5th .
21 28 53 85 149 for 4 and 68.
I'd do it.
Re: Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,213
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 17, 2003
Re: Topic.. Seahawk.net.. Eagles trade for #4
HeavyP wrote:I don't think they're that dumb, unless for some reason they believe that they are one Michael Crabtree away from a championship.
... or something. There would have to be a particular player they're targeting. At WR they have Jackson and Curtis and pretty good depth with Baskett/Avant/Lewis; at CB they have Samuel and Brown; they're not drafting a QB or a RB. They could probably use a good linebacker or two, and maybe a second defensive end to play opposite Trent Cole, but you don't trade up to #4 for those needs in this draft. Maybe they look for a long-term replacement for Tra Thoams? But I can't see why they'd take this kind of extreme measure as long as Thomas is healthy and productive. The Iggles seem like a good bet to stay where they are and go BPA with their picks.