Memphis was 20-5 without Morant, including two 5 game win streaks and a 7 game win streak, yea, younger and more athletic helps, but the superstar part wasn't why they ended up with 56.MartinToVaught wrote:og15 wrote:The Bucks last season were 4-6 after 10 games and 6-8 after 14 games including a 42 points loss to Miami. This was partly due to Jrue Holiday missing 6 of the first 8 games and Middleton missing games 7-14. The Grizzlies started off 10-10 and won 56 games. It's too tough to gauge a whole season at this point in time, especially since teams of course make adjustments to counteract why they are losing.
There's a glaring problem with this analysis.
The Bucks had Giannis, a young star in his prime. Memphis had Ja, a young star in his prime, surrounded by other young athletic players.
I'd say we have Kawhi, but he never actually plays anymore. PG has been one of the worst players on the team this season and has never been the most reliable star. Most of the remaining roster is either old and slow or Lue is too blinded by favoritism to play them. This team isn't just struggling, they look hopeless, like one of the worst teams in the league.
We have a retirement home roster in a league full of youth and athleticism. I hope there's a magical turnaround, but there is nothing at all that's pointing to it. The roster is just the worst possible fit for the modern NBA, and it's compounded by the fact that Lue has no system and no clue.
No coach has no system, and Lue can't go from getting the team to the WCF to having no clue. Of course it is always easier for us to coach from the sidelines and yell everything a coach should have done.
Of course there's going to be some reason that every team that starts slow turns it around, that's how it works. We can't simply say, "well that team had a reason, so it can't work here because the reason isn't exactly the same". Talent is always the reason, if you have talent, you can figure it out. The Celtics were 19-21 after 40 games and won 51 games and went to the finals.
It doesn't matter how unreliable, trash, whatever else PG can be called, he isn't going to shoot 36% FG or less in 80% of his games this season and he isn't going to shoot 26% or lower from 3PT range this season. So that normalizing is basically going to add around 2 ppg to the offense on it's own. Norman Powell is not going to shoot <40% FG and <25% 3PT for the season, that normalizing will add another 2 ppg to the offense. He's a career 1.2 tpg player in 22 mpg averaging 3 tpg without any increased playmaking role causing it.
There are just a lot of things going on that simply don't last for a whole season, so when we have enough games for those things to correct, then at least we can make bigger picture claims. After 6 games, sure, we can say they aren't the most athletic, but the most athletic isn't who ends up winning. We can also say they have started slow, disorganized, whatever else, but it doesn't project anything concrete 6 games in.
Also in the end, if Kawhi isn't playing, this team is not any sort of contender, so I'm certainly not going to be concerned about any great team or contending expectations if he isn't expected to be part of the solution.